PFD report

Violet Leona Jackman · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 1 Dec 2020•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Insufficient Health Visitor capacity to support new parents and young children
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient health visitor capacity to support vulnerable families and young children
  2. Failure to elicit parents’ descriptions of sleeping arrangements
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure safe sleeping arrangements for infants and children
  3. Lack of national clarity about protecting Health Visitor services from redeployment
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Continue providing health visitors and their teams with evidence and advice to support both parents’ engagement in infant care.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 4 January 2021.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient Health Visitor capacity to support new parents and young children

Wider context from the report

“3. The inquest was told that during the first wave of Covid 19, Health Visitors nationally were redeployed into other services. In the area served by this team that meant a 20% reduction decrease in available Health Visitors and stretched services to support new parents significantly. In Trafford, a decision had since been taken that the situation should not continue even in a second wave, given the stretch this put on Health Visitor services and their ability to support parents and young children. However, it was unclear if nationally a similar approach was being taken, or if Health Visitor services were being reduced to support other front line services. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient health visitor capacity to support vulnerable families and young children.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to elicit parents’ descriptions of sleeping arrangements

Wider context from the report

“2. The guidance was given as a series of points. The inquest heard that as a general rule, health visitors do not ask parents to explain in a free text style the sleeping arrangements. It is likely if they had asked for such a description, then they would have been made aware of how the guidance had been interpreted and the sleeping arrangement in place. If they had then the inquest was told that her parents would have been told that the location of the basket was inconsistent with safe sleeping. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure safe sleeping arrangements for infants and children.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of national clarity about protecting Health Visitor services from redeployment

Wider context from the report

“3. The inquest was told that during the first wave of Covid 19, Health Visitors nationally were redeployed into other services. In the area served by this team that meant a 20% reduction decrease in available Health Visitors and stretched services to support new parents significantly. In Trafford, a decision had since been taken that the situation should not continue even in a second wave, given the stretch this put on Health Visitor services and their ability to support parents and young children. However, it was unclear if nationally a similar approach was being taken, or if Health Visitor services were being reduced to support other front line services. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure that shared-care parents understand safe sleeping guidance

Wider context from the report

“1. Safe sleeping advice was given to her mother, although it was clear that care would be shared. There was no clear way of ensuring that both parents understood the guidance given or following up that the advice had been shared in detail. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure safe sleeping arrangements for infants and children.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue providing health visitors and their teams with evidence and advice to support both parents’ engagement in infant care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Fathers have an equally vital role during pregnancy and throughout their child’s life and the first few weeks and months are critical. We will continue to provide health visitors and their teams with evidence and advice on how to ensure both fathers and mothers are supported to adapt to parenthood and engaged in the care of their child.”

Source location

2020-0263-Response-from-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 4 January 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Work with partner organisations to cross-check child death review data against serious incident notifications to support local and national learning.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 4 January 2021.
  2. 2

    Work with key stakeholders to develop shared tools and processes supporting frontline professionals to promote safer sleeping among families with children at risk.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 4 January 2021.
  3. 3

    Continue embedding learning from the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel report on sudden unexpected infant death.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 4 January 2021.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with partner organisations to cross-check child death review data against serious incident notifications to support local and national learning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The report highlights that despite broad success embedding safer sleeping messages with parents, there are still persistent issues for some families when it comes to acting on those lessons. The report is clear that this is a complex issue. We will implement the three national recommendations:”

Source location

2020-0263-Response-from-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 4 January 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with key stakeholders to develop shared tools and processes supporting frontline professionals to promote safer sleeping among families with children at risk.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The report highlights that despite broad success embedding safer sleeping messages with parents, there are still persistent issues for some families when it comes to acting on those lessons. The report is clear that this is a complex issue. We will implement the three national recommendations:”

Source location

2020-0263-Response-from-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 4 January 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue embedding learning from the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel report on sudden unexpected infant death.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will also continue to embed learning from the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel report on sudden unexpected death in infancy [2]. With Ministerial colleagues in the Department for Education (DfE) and Home Office, we have welcomed the report’s recommendations.”

Source location

2020-0263-Response-from-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 4 January 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026