PFD report

Matthew Gayle · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 27 Mar 2018•Staffordshire South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to undertake histology when toxicology is not expected to establish the cause of death
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable determination and recording of causes of death
  2. Insufficient availability and capacity of consultant histopathologists to carry out coroners’ autopsies
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient consultant histopathologist workforce capacity
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to undertake histology when toxicology is not expected to establish the cause of death

Wider context from the report

“Histopathology is very important for determining causes of deaths and it can play a significant role in preventing deaths in the future. When Matthew was found dead he had some illicit drug paraphernalia in one of his hands. He was a young man and the immediate suspicion was that this was a drug related death. The pathologist who conducted the autopsy examined Matthew’s body and took samples for toxicology. Toxicology was carefully carried out (including checking for new psychoactive substances) and the result was that there was nothing in Matthew’s system likely to have caused his death. No histology had been carried out because it was anticipated that toxicology would provide answers. Possibly if histology had been carried out it may have produced a more accurate cause of death for Matthew. I would make it clear that I do not seek to criticise the pathologist in this respect. You will be aware that there are a declining number of consultant histopathologists who are prepared to carry out autopsies for Coroners and many of those who still perform that function are working under substantial pressure. It is important for the proper investigation of death and the prevention of future deaths that there are sufficient histopathologists to carry out autopsies for Coroner when these are required. I would greatly appreciate your assistance with the following: 1. Are active steps being taken to increase the number of consultant histopathologists who will carry out autopsies for Coroners? 2. Will it be a compulsory part of training of doctors who wish to become histopathologists that they do have experience in Coroners’ autopsies? 3. When engaging consultant histopathologists will NHS Trusts appoint doctors who are both competent and willing to carry out autopsies for Coroners? 4. When appointing consultant histopathologists will NHS Trusts ensure that their contractual arrangements enable them to have time to carry out Coroners’ autopsies? 5. Is there any move to increase the fees payable to consultant histopathologists for carrying out Coroners’ autopsies? 6. Are any steps being taken to progress the Hutton report in establishing specialist centres for histopathology? 7. Are you able to provide me with details of any consultant histopathologists who are prepared to carry out autopsies in the large geographical area that I cover? ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable determination and recording of causes of death.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient availability and capacity of consultant histopathologists to carry out coroners’ autopsies

Wider context from the report

“Histopathology is very important for determining causes of deaths and it can play a significant role in preventing deaths in the future. When Matthew was found dead he had some illicit drug paraphernalia in one of his hands. He was a young man and the immediate suspicion was that this was a drug related death. The pathologist who conducted the autopsy examined Matthew’s body and took samples for toxicology. Toxicology was carefully carried out (including checking for new psychoactive substances) and the result was that there was nothing in Matthew’s system likely to have caused his death. No histology had been carried out because it was anticipated that toxicology would provide answers. Possibly if histology had been carried out it may have produced a more accurate cause of death for Matthew. I would make it clear that I do not seek to criticise the pathologist in this respect. You will be aware that there are a declining number of consultant histopathologists who are prepared to carry out autopsies for Coroners and many of those who still perform that function are working under substantial pressure. It is important for the proper investigation of death and the prevention of future deaths that there are sufficient histopathologists to carry out autopsies for Coroner when these are required. I would greatly appreciate your assistance with the following: 1. Are active steps being taken to increase the number of consultant histopathologists who will carry out autopsies for Coroners? 2. Will it be a compulsory part of training of doctors who wish to become histopathologists that they do have experience in Coroners’ autopsies? 3. When engaging consultant histopathologists will NHS Trusts appoint doctors who are both competent and willing to carry out autopsies for Coroners? 4. When appointing consultant histopathologists will NHS Trusts ensure that their contractual arrangements enable them to have time to carry out Coroners’ autopsies? 5. Is there any move to increase the fees payable to consultant histopathologists for carrying out Coroners’ autopsies? 6. Are any steps being taken to progress the Hutton report in establishing specialist centres for histopathology? 7. Are you able to provide me with details of any consultant histopathologists who are prepared to carry out autopsies in the large geographical area that I cover? ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient consultant histopathologist workforce capacity.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.