PFD report

Elizabeth Grace Holder · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 25 Jul 2024•East London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to prevent predictable and avoidable falls
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risks
  2. Failure of governance systems to identify and reflect upon failings in care
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to identify and address recurring safety issues through organisational learning
  3. Failure to remediate factors contributing to death
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    The Trust is responsible for responding to concerns about its failures and explaining what went wrong.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to prevent predictable and avoidable falls

Wider context from the report

“1. The Trust’s failure to prevent a predictable and therefore avoidable fall which resulted in death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of governance systems to identify and reflect upon failings in care

Wider context from the report

“2. Despite this incident activating the PSIRF process which resulted in the completion of an After Action Review (“AAR”), the Trust did not identify any sub-optimal aspects to Mrs Holder’s care. Accordingly, I have a concern regarding the failure of the Trust’s governance systems to; a. Identify and reflect upon failings in care, b. Consequently, the failure of the trust to act in a way to remediate the factors that contributed to Mrs Holder’s death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to identify and address recurring safety issues through organisational learning.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to remediate factors contributing to death

Wider context from the report

“2. Despite this incident activating the PSIRF process which resulted in the completion of an After Action Review (“AAR”), the Trust did not identify any sub-optimal aspects to Mrs Holder’s care. Accordingly, I have a concern regarding the failure of the Trust’s governance systems to; a. Identify and reflect upon failings in care, b. Consequently, the failure of the trust to act in a way to remediate the factors that contributed to Mrs Holder’s death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Trust is responsible for responding to concerns about its failures and explaining what went wrong.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The report raises concerns over the Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust’s failure to prevent a predictable and therefore avoidable fall which resulted in death. Despite this incident activating the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) at the Trust, no sub-optimal aspects to Mrs Holder’s care were identified. Thus, there are concerns around the failure of the Trust’s governance systems to:”

Source location

Response from DHSC
Page 1 · response
Published 1 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The CQC will determine whether further regulatory action concerning the Trust’s PSIRF and governance is appropriate or necessary.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I have been informed that the CQC will be discussing the PSIRF in upcoming meetings with the Trust. The CQC also continue to monitor the Trust and will consider whether further action is appropriate or necessary. I look forward to any developments which could provide a deeper understanding of the underlying issues at the Trust and help preventing future deaths such as Mrs Holder’s.”

Source location

Response from DHSC
Page 2 · response
Published 1 August 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026