PFD report

Rebecca Marshall · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 Sep 2019•Inner South London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to obtain and share information with other trusts for patients moving to or from the area
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated care
  2. Failure to review patients as required
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Implement Trust-wide reminders and policy-sharing that disseminate learning from gaps in Rebecca’s care.

    Stated by Kent and Medway Mental Health NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 November 2019.
  2. Action

    Incorporate South London and the Maudsley’s Transient People policy into the overarching policy document.

    Stated by Kent and Medway Mental Health NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 5 November 2019.
  3. Action

    Review the Transfer and Discharge of Care policy to cover transfers involving vulnerable populations, including students, travellers and refugees.

    Stated by Kent and Medway Mental Health NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 November 2019.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to obtain and share information with other trusts for patients moving to or from the area

Wider context from the report

“(1) At inquest I was told that both Trusts involved: SLaM and KMPT had investigated the circumstances of Miss Marshall's death independently. (2) At a pre-inquest review hearing on 18 October 2018 I suggested that in light of the circumstances of the case it would be preferable for a joint report to be produced focussing on the apparent lack of interagency communication which had apparently led to Miss Marshall not being reviewed as required. (3) At inquest I was told that following the pre-inquest review hearing there had been a meeting between the two Trust's and that the report from KMPT would be exhibited to and form part of the report of SLaM Trust. (4) Both reports identified a number of missed opportunities in Miss Marshall's care, including steps to ensure joint ownership of her care when she became a student in London. (5) I was told at inquest of the lessons learnt by both Trusts and the actions completed. (6) From what I was told at inquest however, it appeared that KMPT had not taken any steps to address the issues of obtaining collateral information from or sharing information with other Trusts involved in the care of one of their patients, particularly if they have moved, permanently or temporarily to / from KMPTs area. (7) Miss Marshall formed part of what could be considered to be a particularly vulnerable group of individuals, namely a member of the student population suffering from mental health challenges whose continuity of care could not be guaranteed by good inter Trust communication. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to review patients as required

Wider context from the report

“(1) At inquest I was told that both Trusts involved: SLaM and KMPT had investigated the circumstances of Miss Marshall's death independently. (2) At a pre-inquest review hearing on 18 October 2018 I suggested that in light of the circumstances of the case it would be preferable for a joint report to be produced focussing on the apparent lack of interagency communication which had apparently led to Miss Marshall not being reviewed as required. (3) At inquest I was told that following the pre-inquest review hearing there had been a meeting between the two Trust's and that the report from KMPT would be exhibited to and form part of the report of SLaM Trust. (4) Both reports identified a number of missed opportunities in Miss Marshall's care, including steps to ensure joint ownership of her care when she became a student in London. (5) I was told at inquest of the lessons learnt by both Trusts and the actions completed. (6) From what I was told at inquest however, it appeared that KMPT had not taken any steps to address the issues of obtaining collateral information from or sharing information with other Trusts involved in the care of one of their patients, particularly if they have moved, permanently or temporarily to / from KMPTs area. (7) Miss Marshall formed part of what could be considered to be a particularly vulnerable group of individuals, namely a member of the student population suffering from mental health challenges whose continuity of care could not be guaranteed by good inter Trust communication. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement Trust-wide reminders and policy-sharing that disseminate learning from gaps in Rebecca’s care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• A programme of reminders and sharing of the Transfer and Discharge of Care policy is in place across the Trust, underpinned by sharing the learning about the gaps in Rebecca’s care and what should have happened.”

Source location

2019-0313-Response-by-Kent-and-Medway-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 5 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Incorporate South London and the Maudsley’s Transient People policy into the overarching policy document.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• We have liaised with South London and the Maudsley and are incorporating their Transient People policy in to our overarching document”

Source location

2019-0313-Response-by-Kent-and-Medway-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 5 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the Transfer and Discharge of Care policy to cover transfers involving vulnerable populations, including students, travellers and refugees.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The Transfer and Discharge of Care policy has been reviewed to ensure that it properly addresses any and all instances of care transfer, including vulnerable populations. This includes students, travellers and refugees.”

Source location

2019-0313-Response-by-Kent-and-Medway-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 5 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue testing and refining care-transfer processes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“You have my personal assurance as Chief Executive, that we will continue to test and refine our processes, sharing our reflection and learning from Rebecca’s story with staff who deliver front line care every day.”

Source location

2019-0313-Response-by-Kent-and-Medway-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 5 November 2019

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Pilot a direct referral form from the University Health Centre.

    Stated by Kent and Medway Mental Health NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 5 November 2019.
  2. 2

    Develop a shared care protocol with local universities to strengthen two-way communication about students’ mental health.

    Stated by Kent and Medway Mental Health NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 5 November 2019.
  3. 3

    Strengthen consent-to-share processes so students can authorise information sharing with the University Health Centre.

    Stated by Kent and Medway Mental Health NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 November 2019.
  4. 4

    Seek university partners’ input on engagement and joint working when Kent residents attend university outside the county.

    Stated by Kent and Medway Mental Health NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 5 November 2019.
  5. 5

    Develop a fast-track referral route from universities to the Community Mental Health Team.

    Stated by Kent and Medway Mental Health NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 5 November 2019.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Pilot a direct referral form from the University Health Centre.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Piloting of a new, direct referral form from the University Health Centre.”

Source location

2019-0313-Response-by-Kent-and-Medway-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 5 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a shared care protocol with local universities to strengthen two-way communication about students’ mental health.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Development (in partnership with our local universities) of a shared care protocol between KMPT and Higher Education to ensure clear and easy two way communication to further strengthen the safeguards for students’ mental health.”

Source location

2019-0313-Response-by-Kent-and-Medway-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 5 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Strengthen consent-to-share processes so students can authorise information sharing with the University Health Centre.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Strengthening of our Consent to Share Information process which now ensures that we are given permission by students to share information with the University Health Centre.”

Source location

2019-0313-Response-by-Kent-and-Medway-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 5 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Seek university partners’ input on engagement and joint working when Kent residents attend university outside the county.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At the next meeting (22nd November 2019) with the Kent Universities as part of this review we will seek input from our University partners on the process of engagement and joint working when Kent residents attend university out of County.”

Source location

2019-0313-Response-by-Kent-and-Medway-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 5 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a fast-track referral route from universities to the Community Mental Health Team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Development of a fast track referral route from the Universities to our Community Mental Health Team.”

Source location

2019-0313-Response-by-Kent-and-Medway-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 5 November 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026