PFD report

Mihangel ap Dafydd · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 3 May 2016•Carmarthenshire and Pembrokeshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to provide ligature-free windows in service user areas
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to control ligature risks in inpatient and custodial environments
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Submit prioritised recommendations for each unit to the 2016/17 Capital Programme for consideration.

    Stated by Hywel Dda University LHBStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 3 May 2016.
  2. Action

    Develop and prioritise a programme addressing window risks across inpatient units.

    Stated by Hywel Dda University LHBStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 3 May 2016.
  3. Action

    Secure windows in areas identified as presenting potential ligature risks.

    Stated by Hywel Dda University LHBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 May 2016.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Window replacement was not prioritised because identified ligature risks were mitigated by securing windows and considering competing Health Board priorities.

    Stated by Hywel Dda University LHBExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide ligature-free windows in service user areas

Wider context from the report

“The windows in service user areas at Morlais Ward are not ligature free and whilst it is intended to make them so following the death of Mr ap Dafydd this work has not yet been undertaken. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to control ligature risks in inpatient and custodial environments.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Submit prioritised recommendations for each unit to the 2016/17 Capital Programme for consideration.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The point of ligature audit programme plans to repeat the audit of all inpatient units across mental health and learning disabilities in May/June 2016. Following which a prioritised recommendations will be submitted for consideration by the 2016/17 Capital programme, for each unit considering”

Source location

2016-0169-Response-by-University-Health-Board
Page 1 · response
Published 3 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and prioritise a programme addressing window risks across inpatient units.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The point of ligature audit programme plans to repeat the audit of all inpatient units across mental health and learning disabilities in May/June 2016. Following which a prioritised recommendations will be submitted for consideration by the 2016/17 Capital programme, for each unit considering”

Source location

2016-0169-Response-by-University-Health-Board
Page 1 · response
Published 3 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Secure windows in areas identified as presenting potential ligature risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that the Health Board undertakes an annual point of ligature audit programme across all of its mental health and learning disability in-patient units, which includes an audit of Morlais Ward on the West Wales General Hospital site. The point of ligature audits undertaken following Mr. ap Dafydd's death identified potential point of ligature risks with windows on a number of the in-patient units, including Morlais Ward which were reported through the Health Board's Capital programme. The point of ligature programme is considered alongside all of the annual priorities across the Health Board, and the replacement of windows was not deemed to be the greatest priority, as following identification of the risk, steps were taken to mitigate the risk, including the securing of windows in some areas.”

Source location

2016-0169-Response-by-University-Health-Board
Page 1 · response
Published 3 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Repeat point-of-ligature audits across all mental health and learning disability inpatient units in May or June 2016.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The point of ligature audit programme plans to repeat the audit of all inpatient units across mental health and learning disabilities in May/June 2016. Following which a prioritised recommendations will be submitted for consideration by the 2016/17 Capital programme, for each unit considering”

Source location

2016-0169-Response-by-University-Health-Board
Page 1 · response
Published 3 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undertake a formal review of Health Building Note 35 to assess whether substantial amendment or replacement by a revised HBN 03-01 is needed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to the above, I have also requested that NHS Shared Services Partnership – Specialist Estate Services (NWSSP-SES) undertake a formal review of HBN 35. This will consider if the HBN needs more substantial amendment or if it should be superseded by a revised HBN 03-01, amended, where required, to reflect further developments in Welsh Government policy and any specific needs of NHS Wales.”

Source location

2016-0169-Response-by-Welsh-Government
Page 1 · response
Published 3 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue an addendum to Health Building Note 35 requiring ligature-free design in new and existing acute mental health facilities, including CAMHS.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I note your report and requested actions have been sent to the Chief Executive of Hywel Dda University Health Board. However, given that you have identified issues which are of relevance to all NHS organisations, I can confirm that we will be issuing an addendum to Health Building Note 35 – “Accommodation for People with Mental Illness Part 1: The Acute Unit Ligature Free Design”. This addendum will specifically highlight the requirement for ligature free design in both new and existing acute mental health unit facilities in Wales. The addendum to the Health Building Note will also widen the requirements to other facilities dealing with acute mental health in-patients including Children & Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS). This document is in the process of being finalised by Welsh Government officials and our NHS estates advisors and will issue by the end of this month.”

Source location

2016-0169-Response-by-Welsh-Government
Page 1 · response
Published 3 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Window replacement was not prioritised because identified ligature risks were mitigated by securing windows and considering competing Health Board priorities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that the Health Board undertakes an annual point of ligature audit programme across all of its mental health and learning disability in-patient units, which includes an audit of Morlais Ward on the West Wales General Hospital site. The point of ligature audits undertaken following Mr. ap Dafydd's death identified potential point of ligature risks with windows on a number of the in-patient units, including Morlais Ward which were reported through the Health Board's Capital programme. The point of ligature programme is considered alongside all of the annual priorities across the Health Board, and the replacement of windows was not deemed to be the greatest priority, as following identification of the risk, steps were taken to mitigate the risk, including the securing of windows in some areas.”

Source location

2016-0169-Response-by-University-Health-Board
Page 1 · response
Published 3 May 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026