PFD report

Sandra Phillpott · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Jul 2024•Blackpool and the Fylde

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
11

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Delays in providing urgent treatment for suspected sepsis
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis
  2. Failure to recognize suspected sepsis
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Action

    Operate a trust-wide sepsis quality-improvement collaborative and disseminate its change package through clinical teams.

    Stated by Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 July 2024.
  2. Action

    Submit incidents for delayed sepsis identification, conduct rapid reviews where harm is suspected, and feed identified learning into the sepsis pathway group.

    Stated by Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 July 2024.
  3. Action

    Deliver sepsis briefings, safety-huddle and team-meeting teaching, mandated recognition-and-action training, induction training and ward-level knowledge audits.

    Stated by Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 July 2024.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in providing urgent treatment for suspected sepsis

Wider context from the report

“• The concern relates to the recognition of suspected sepsis, and the need for timely provision of treatment for suspected sepsis. • Notwithstanding that I determined that from the available evidence timely treatment would not have altered the fatal outcome, I remain firmly of the view this report is necessary. • I was informed at the inquest that there have been significant improvements in the management of sepsis within the Emergency Department. • This court has raised concerns with the hospital Trust about this issue previously, and I know it is an issue which the Trust is very aware of and I do not doubt that efforts have been made to make improvements, but having conducted this inquest into Sandra’s death, in my view there remains a risk that sepsis will go unrecognized, and urgent treatment will be delayed, putting patients attending Blackpool Victoria Hospital at risk. My duty to write this report is therefore met. It is not for me to be prescriptive about what action ought to be taken, but to raise this concern should I feel this is necessary. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to recognize suspected sepsis

Wider context from the report

“• The concern relates to the recognition of suspected sepsis, and the need for timely provision of treatment for suspected sepsis. • Notwithstanding that I determined that from the available evidence timely treatment would not have altered the fatal outcome, I remain firmly of the view this report is necessary. • I was informed at the inquest that there have been significant improvements in the management of sepsis within the Emergency Department. • This court has raised concerns with the hospital Trust about this issue previously, and I know it is an issue which the Trust is very aware of and I do not doubt that efforts have been made to make improvements, but having conducted this inquest into Sandra’s death, in my view there remains a risk that sepsis will go unrecognized, and urgent treatment will be delayed, putting patients attending Blackpool Victoria Hospital at risk. My duty to write this report is therefore met. It is not for me to be prescriptive about what action ought to be taken, but to raise this concern should I feel this is necessary. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate a trust-wide sepsis quality-improvement collaborative and disseminate its change package through clinical teams.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A new sepsis proforma was developed for clinical practice and the policy updated. Historically, the Trust had contributed to the AQUA audit for peer review and had a composite process score of around 30% and ranked below 12th position in the league tables within our area. The AQUA audit is of a small percentage of patients each quarter. This process was improved by increasing the number of audits to 40 patients per week, through the clinical audit team, with validated data. The Associate Directors. This more detailed audit provided the team with richer data which enabled the identification of learning themes and areas of targeted focus. The learning themes were used to design a quality improvement collaborative which began in May 22 for the management of patients with sepsis.”

Source location

Response from Blackpool Teaching Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 30 July 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Submit incidents for delayed sepsis identification, conduct rapid reviews where harm is suspected, and feed identified learning into the sepsis pathway group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would like to assure you that if our records show that a patient’s sepsis has not been identified within the appropriate timescale, incidents are submitted on the Trust’s incident management system. Where harm is suspected the Trust undertakes a Rapid Review which is presented to the twice weekly Rapid Review Panel. This process ensures that appropriate learning is identified and a proportionate learning response deployed. Where learning is identified, this is fed into the Trust’s sepsis pathway group to enable further improvements to be initiated.”

Source location

Response from Blackpool Teaching Hospitals
Page 3 · response
Published 30 July 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver sepsis briefings, safety-huddle and team-meeting teaching, mandated recognition-and-action training, induction training and ward-level knowledge audits.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To support staff knowledge, briefings for all staff were developed and shared through safety huddles, team meetings and training. This was supported by ward/ unit level ‘teach/learn’ audits whereby the ward managers/leaders ask staff questions related to sepsis each month and use the results to improve practice. For sustainability sepsis was included in the mandated recognition and act training for all clinical staff and inductions.”

Source location

Response from Blackpool Teaching Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 30 July 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Focus the next 12 months of quality-improvement work on escalation pathways through expert forums and trust-wide events.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust continues to keep sepsis in focus with monthly updates provided to the Trust’s Clinical Governance Committee, and Quality Assurance Committee regarding sepsis pathway compliance. The current area of focus for improvement are:”

Source location

Response from Blackpool Teaching Hospitals
Page 3 · response
Published 30 July 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement an updated sepsis policy and clinical sepsis proforma aligned with national guidance and the sepsis six.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A new sepsis proforma was developed for clinical practice and the policy updated. Historically, the Trust had contributed to the AQUA audit for peer review and had a composite process score of around 30% and ranked below 12th position in the league tables within our area. The AQUA audit is of a small percentage of patients each quarter. This process was improved by increasing the number of audits to 40 patients per week, through the clinical audit team, with validated data. The Associate Directors. This more detailed audit provided the team with richer data which enabled the identification of learning themes and areas of targeted focus. The learning themes were used to design a quality improvement collaborative which began in May 22 for the management of patients with sepsis.”

Source location

Response from Blackpool Teaching Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 30 July 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Hold weekly Emergency Department sepsis review meetings to examine data and drive improvement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“For areas with high numbers of sepsis patients, such as the Emergency Department (ED), a weekly review meeting was put in place and has continued to ensure focus on data and improvements. Overall compliance to the actions from the organisation are reviewed through a monthly subject matter expert group for sepsis, where the data, training, new ways of working are monitored.”

Source location

Response from Blackpool Teaching Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 30 July 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Increase validated sepsis pathway auditing to 40 patients weekly and use identified learning themes to target improvement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A new sepsis proforma was developed for clinical practice and the policy updated. Historically, the Trust had contributed to the AQUA audit for peer review and had a composite process score of around 30% and ranked below 12th position in the league tables within our area. The AQUA audit is of a small percentage of patients each quarter. This process was improved by increasing the number of audits to 40 patients per week, through the clinical audit team, with validated data. The Associate Directors. This more detailed audit provided the team with richer data which enabled the identification of learning themes and areas of targeted focus. The learning themes were used to design a quality improvement collaborative which began in May 22 for the management of patients with sepsis.”

Source location

Response from Blackpool Teaching Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 30 July 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Review sepsis data, training and new working arrangements through a monthly subject-matter expert group.

    Stated by Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 July 2024.
  2. 2

    Report sepsis compliance, training and concerns through divisional governance and Trust-level Clinical Governance and Quality Assurance Committees.

    Stated by Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 July 2024.
  3. 3

    Appoint two organisational sepsis leads to provide system-wide action, governance and oversight.

    Stated by Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 July 2024.
  4. 4

    Include sepsis compliance in integrated performance reporting and review it through performance forums and Trust Board oversight.

    Stated by Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 July 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review sepsis data, training and new working arrangements through a monthly subject-matter expert group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“For areas with high numbers of sepsis patients, such as the Emergency Department (ED), a weekly review meeting was put in place and has continued to ensure focus on data and improvements. Overall compliance to the actions from the organisation are reviewed through a monthly subject matter expert group for sepsis, where the data, training, new ways of working are monitored.”

Source location

Response from Blackpool Teaching Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 30 July 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Report sepsis compliance, training and concerns through divisional governance and Trust-level Clinical Governance and Quality Assurance Committees.

Verbatim wording from the response

“For transparency and oversight sepsis compliance is reported to the wider organisation through both Clinical Governance Committee and Quality Assurance Committee. Divisions include sepsis pathway compliance, training data and clinical concerns in divisional governance meetings. For sustainability, the sepsis CPS score is now included in the organisational integrated performance report which is overseen at the Quality Assurance Committee and is reviewed at the Trust’s performance forum, the Performance, Improvement, Delivery and Assurance (PIDA) Meeting and at Trust Board to ensure continuing compliance with the pathway.”

Source location

Response from Blackpool Teaching Hospitals
Page 3 · response
Published 30 July 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Appoint two organisational sepsis leads to provide system-wide action, governance and oversight.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Two sepsis leads were nominated for the organisation and put into place. The Associate Medical Director, and the Associate Director of Nursing/Harm Free Care led the response, ensuring system wide action, governance, and oversight.”

Source location

Response from Blackpool Teaching Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 30 July 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include sepsis compliance in integrated performance reporting and review it through performance forums and Trust Board oversight.

Verbatim wording from the response

“For transparency and oversight sepsis compliance is reported to the wider organisation through both Clinical Governance Committee and Quality Assurance Committee. Divisions include sepsis pathway compliance, training data and clinical concerns in divisional governance meetings. For sustainability, the sepsis CPS score is now included in the organisational integrated performance report which is overseen at the Quality Assurance Committee and is reviewed at the Trust’s performance forum, the Performance, Improvement, Delivery and Assurance (PIDA) Meeting and at Trust Board to ensure continuing compliance with the pathway.”

Source location

Response from Blackpool Teaching Hospitals
Page 3 · response
Published 30 July 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026