PFD report

Christopher Talbot · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 29 Nov 2017•Preston and West Lancashire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Lack of formal training in reception duties
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate prison reception safeguards
  2. Failure to inform staff of the manner of unnatural prisoner deaths
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable sharing of safety-critical risk information within prisons
  3. Lack of written material informing reception officers of their duties
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate prison reception safeguards
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of formal training in reception duties

Wider context from the report

“(1) The Supervising Officer on duty at Reception when Mr Talbot arrived had never received training in her duties but merely gained experience by shadowing another officer. It did not appear that any written material was provided so as to inform her of her duties, including the PSI “Early Days In Custody, Reception In, First Night In Custody And Induction To Custody” or a guidance document summarising the main provisions of the PSI. Lack of such written material and reliance solely on shadowing as a means of training might bring about a position where bad habits are proliferated or important considerations missed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate prison reception safeguards.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to inform staff of the manner of unnatural prisoner deaths

Wider context from the report

“(3) It is understood that following the death of a prisoner a notice to this effect is issued to the prisoners and staff but that staff are not informed of the manner of an unnatural death. Thus, it appeared that staff attending to give evidence at the inquest were unaware of another recent previous death involving a plastic bag, knowledge of which might have led to extra vigilance in the case of Mr Talbot, when as a vulnerable prisoner, he was observed holding a plastic bag. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable sharing of safety-critical risk information within prisons.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of written material informing reception officers of their duties

Wider context from the report

“(1) The Supervising Officer on duty at Reception when Mr Talbot arrived had never received training in her duties but merely gained experience by shadowing another officer. It did not appear that any written material was provided so as to inform her of her duties, including the PSI “Early Days In Custody, Reception In, First Night In Custody And Induction To Custody” or a guidance document summarising the main provisions of the PSI. Lack of such written material and reliance solely on shadowing as a means of training might bring about a position where bad habits are proliferated or important considerations missed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate prison reception safeguards.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of breathing guards for senior officers during resuscitation

Wider context from the report

“(2) A Senior Officer gave mouth to mouth resuscitation to Mr Talbot without the use of a guard. It is understood that although mandatory for more junior officers at HMP Preston, carrying a breathing guard at all times is discretionary for certain senior grades. Lack of such a guard might put an officer in personal danger when attempting to revive a prisoner or dissuade that officer from intervening, with potential adverse consequences for the prisoner. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably respond to patient breathing emergencies; Unreliable access to barrier devices for emergency resuscitation; Unreliable resuscitation preparedness and response during cardiac arrest.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.