PFD report

Michaela Marie Haines · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 23 Nov 2017•Carmarthenshire and Pembrokeshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to keep the STORM report updated with actions taken and changing developments
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable operation of the STORM emergency incident-management system
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Keep STORM logs open until investigations are complete or transfer enquiries to an alternative recording system.

    Stated by Dyfed-Powys PoliceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 27 February 2018.
  2. Action

    Record all raised actions numerically.

    Stated by Dyfed-Powys PoliceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 27 February 2018.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The review found no suspicious circumstances or evidence of third-party involvement despite shortcomings in recording and managing the investigation.

    Stated by Dyfed-Powys PoliceDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to keep the STORM report updated with actions taken and changing developments

Wider context from the report

“The STORM report had not been up-dated with actions taken. This caused uncertainty as to whether outstanding enquiries had been actioned or not. This may have resulted in evidence not being preserved. It could also result in work being duplicated with enquiries being made when they have already been undertaken. If the STORM report is to be used as an effective command and control document it is essential that it is updated in the light of changing developments. Training may be required to remind those using this vital work tool of the need to keep it up to date. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable operation of the STORM emergency incident-management system.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Keep STORM logs open until investigations are complete or transfer enquiries to an alternative recording system.

Verbatim wording from the response

“recommendations were identified which are currently subject to implementation and include:”

Source location

2017-0415-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 27 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Record all raised actions numerically.

Verbatim wording from the response

“recommendations were identified which are currently subject to implementation and include:”

Source location

2017-0415-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 27 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The review found no suspicious circumstances or evidence of third-party involvement despite shortcomings in recording and managing the investigation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the completion of the review I am firmly of the belief that there are no suspicious circumstances. The investigation concerning the events of the evening shows no evidence of third party involvement. However, it apparent that the recent separation from her boyfriend was causing Ms Haines some distress and I support your view that it was a cry for help which tragically resulted in her death.”

Source location

2017-0415-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 27 February 2018

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Review and amend the Sudden Death Policy to confirm the officer in command and how enquiries are recorded.

    Stated by Dyfed-Powys PoliceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 27 February 2018.
  2. 2

    Record a clear decision and rationale determining how each investigation proceeds.

    Stated by Dyfed-Powys PoliceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 27 February 2018.
  3. 3

    Conduct a Force Senior Investigating Officer review of the initial response and subsequent investigation.

    Stated by Dyfed-Powys PoliceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 27 February 2018.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and amend the Sudden Death Policy to confirm the officer in command and how enquiries are recorded.

Verbatim wording from the response

“recommendations were identified which are currently subject to implementation and include:”

Source location

2017-0415-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 27 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Record a clear decision and rationale determining how each investigation proceeds.

Verbatim wording from the response

“recommendations were identified which are currently subject to implementation and include:”

Source location

2017-0415-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 27 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct a Force Senior Investigating Officer review of the initial response and subsequent investigation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In my capacity as Head of CID for Dyfed Powys Police and on your instruction in accordance with Regulation 28, I caused a review to be conducted by a Force Senior Investigating Officer to explore the initial response and subsequent investigation. I am also aware of the Human Rights Article 2 Ruling On Engagement report, which I have read in pursuance of this review and letter.”

Source location

2017-0415-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 27 February 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026