PFD report

Gordon Arthur · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 2 Feb 2017•Manchester West

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of policies governing the process of investigative tests
  2. Lack of policies governing notification of investigative test results to responsible Consultants
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Complete a joint review of policies governing radiological investigation requests and communication of results to requesting clinicians.

    Stated by Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 February 2017.
  2. Action

    Disseminate radiology notification protocols by email and discuss them at the Orthopaedic clinical governance meeting.

    Stated by Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 February 2017.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Existing radiology notification protocols and communication arrangements are considered sufficient to support timely review and appropriate treatment.

    Stated by Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of policies governing the process of investigative tests

Wider context from the report

“i. The lack of policies dealing with the process of investigative tests and the notification of their results to Consultants in charge of a patient’s care could lead to patients not being given the treatment they require, which could result in a future death. I therefore request that you review the policies and procedures relating to investigative procedures and the reporting of their results to the Consultant in charge of the patient’s care in order to prevent a future death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of policies governing notification of investigative test results to responsible Consultants

Wider context from the report

“i. The lack of policies dealing with the process of investigative tests and the notification of their results to Consultants in charge of a patient’s care could lead to patients not being given the treatment they require, which could result in a future death. I therefore request that you review the policies and procedures relating to investigative procedures and the reporting of their results to the Consultant in charge of the patient’s care in order to prevent a future death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete a joint review of policies governing radiological investigation requests and communication of results to requesting clinicians.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following receipt of your letter the Clinical Director for Radiology and the Clinical Director for the Orthopaedic service carried out a joint review of the current trust policies in relation to the ordering of radiological investigations and how the results of such investigations are communicated to the requesting clinicians.”

Source location

2017-0009-Response-by-Salford-Royal-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 19 February 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate radiology notification protocols by email and discuss them at the Orthopaedic clinical governance meeting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is clear that channels of good communication are needed to ensure that this system is effective. The review confirmed that Salford Royal NHS Trust has the following protocols in place;”

Source location

2017-0009-Response-by-Salford-Royal-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 19 February 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing radiology notification protocols and communication arrangements are considered sufficient to support timely review and appropriate treatment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is clear that channels of good communication are needed to ensure that this system is effective. The review confirmed that Salford Royal NHS Trust has the following protocols in place;”

Source location

2017-0009-Response-by-Salford-Royal-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 19 February 2017

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    The clinician requesting an investigation is responsible for reviewing results and coordinating the patient’s care pathway.

    Stated by Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation TrustRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The clinician requesting an investigation is responsible for reviewing results and coordinating the patient’s care pathway.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The current process in the trust dictates that it is the responsibility of the Clinician requesting the investigation to”

Source location

2017-0009-Response-by-Salford-Royal-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 19 February 2017

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026