Diana Ruth Hughes · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 18 May 2015•Gloucestershire

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
0

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 0 recipients

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Unclear communication of specific surgical procedure instructions via the WHO / Surgical checklist
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable use of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

    Amend the WHO/Surgical checklist to direct staff to verify that special post-operative instructions are written on the operation note.

  2. Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

    Review the documentation policy regarding use of a dedicated operation note for recording surgical procedure information.

  3. Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

    Include a heading identifying special post-operative care instructions in any new operation note document.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

    Recording surgical procedures on medical continuation sheets remains acceptable under current Trust documentation policy.

    Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unclear communication of specific surgical procedure instructions via the WHO / Surgical checklist

Wider context from the report

“(1) How specific instructions for a surgical procedure are communicated to other medical personnel via the WHO / Surgical checklist. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable use of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Amend the WHO/Surgical checklist to direct staff to verify that special post-operative instructions are written on the operation note.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. Consideration is being given to amending the WHO/Surgical checklist document to include an additional instruction to direct staff at the end of the procedure to check whether ‘special instructions’ for post-operative care have been physically written on the operation note.”

Source location

2015-0195-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 18 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the documentation policy regarding use of a dedicated operation note for recording surgical procedure information.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Consideration is being given to a review of the Trust documentation policy to establish that the record of the surgical/operative procedure should be completed on a new operation note document specifically designed to record that clinical information. In Mrs Hughes’ case, the operation notes were written onto a medical continuation sheet, in red pen. This is currently acceptable Trust policy.”

Source location

2015-0195-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 18 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include a heading identifying special post-operative care instructions in any new operation note document.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. It is also intended that any new operation note document incorporates a heading to specifically identify ‘Special Instructions’ for post-operative care”

Source location

2015-0195-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 18 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Recording surgical procedures on medical continuation sheets remains acceptable under current Trust documentation policy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Consideration is being given to a review of the Trust documentation policy to establish that the record of the surgical/operative procedure should be completed on a new operation note document specifically designed to record that clinical information. In Mrs Hughes’ case, the operation notes were written onto a medical continuation sheet, in red pen. This is currently acceptable Trust policy.”

Source location

2015-0195-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 18 May 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/0

Data last updated 7 September 2026