PFD report

Gavin James WHEALE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 10 Jul 2025•Birmingham and Solihull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to provide equivalent monitoring for prisoners after handover from constant supervision
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate supervision and monitoring of prisoners
  2. Lack of clear staff guidance for managing internally secreted items that are removed and ingested without their previous packaging
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Issue staff guidance requiring fully documented risk assessments and recorded risk-management actions for prisoners entering HMP Birmingham under constant supervision.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 July 2025.
  2. Action

    Update HMP Birmingham’s Secreted Items Policy with staff guidance for suspected prisoner ingestion, including healthcare notification, observations and consideration of suicide and self-harm procedures.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 July 2025.
  3. Action

    Implement consistent suspected-ingestion guidance across establishments in the West Midlands region.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 July 2025.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide equivalent monitoring for prisoners after handover from constant supervision

Wider context from the report

“2. Evidence was heard from WMP and GEOAmey staff dealing with their required procedures where a person in their custody, in this instance Mr Wheale, was known or suspected of concealing items; both organisations required constant supervision and handcuffing. My concern is that upon handover to HMP Birmingham prisoners who have previously been under constant supervision, with their movement restricted, enter a regime with no equivalent levels of monitoring rendering HMP Birmingham unable to fully discharge their duty of care to that prisoner. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate supervision and monitoring of prisoners.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clear staff guidance for managing internally secreted items that are removed and ingested without their previous packaging

Wider context from the report

“1. At the time Mr Wheale resided in HMP Birmingham, HMP Birmingham Secreted Item Policy (January 2020) was in force. An updated policy was issued after Mr Wheale’s death (dated Aug 2024). Both versions of the policy accept that ‘There is a clear risk to a prisoner’s health when an item is secreted internally’. My concern is that focus of the policy is the prevention of contraband entering the prison system and therefore it presupposes the outcome of the secreted item(s) being surrendered or disposed of by the prisoner. It does not provide clear guidance to staff on a situation, as with Mr Wheale, where an item previously concealed is then claimed to have been (or indeed a situation where it was witnessed to have been) removed and ingested without its previous packaging. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue staff guidance requiring fully documented risk assessments and recorded risk-management actions for prisoners entering HMP Birmingham under constant supervision.

Verbatim wording from the response

“You also raise a concern regarding the management of prisoners who enter the prison on high levels of monitoring. In response to this, HMP Birmingham will be issuing guidance to staff to ensure that a fully documented risk assessment is completed for any prisoner entering the establishment under constant supervision, whether due to secreted items or other reasons - to ensure that the individual is managed effectively and safely, clearly documenting the actions to be taken to manage any associated risks.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probabtion Service
Page 1 · response
Published 16 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update HMP Birmingham’s Secreted Items Policy with staff guidance for suspected prisoner ingestion, including healthcare notification, observations and consideration of suicide and self-harm procedures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The first concern you raise relates to HMP Birmingham’s Secreted Items Policy and its focus on preventing contraband from entering the prison system. I can confirm that following the inquest the prison has committed to updating the local policy to include clear guidance for staff on the action they need to take where it is suspected that a prisoner has ingested an item. The guidance will cover steps such as notifying healthcare, initiating appropriate observations, and considering whether suicide and self-harm procedures should be opened. Additionally, the West Midlands group Safety Lead will ensure that consistent guidance is implemented across all establishments within their regional area.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probabtion Service
Page 1 · response
Published 16 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement consistent suspected-ingestion guidance across establishments in the West Midlands region.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The first concern you raise relates to HMP Birmingham’s Secreted Items Policy and its focus on preventing contraband from entering the prison system. I can confirm that following the inquest the prison has committed to updating the local policy to include clear guidance for staff on the action they need to take where it is suspected that a prisoner has ingested an item. The guidance will cover steps such as notifying healthcare, initiating appropriate observations, and considering whether suicide and self-harm procedures should be opened. Additionally, the West Midlands group Safety Lead will ensure that consistent guidance is implemented across all establishments within their regional area.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probabtion Service
Page 1 · response
Published 16 July 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026