PFD report

Samuel Boon · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 Feb 2014•South London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
7

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised7

  1. Failure to proactively obtain up-to-date participant medical information before departure
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate individual risk assessment for activities
  2. Failure to include fitness, preparation, acclimatisation and medical-emergency evacuation risks in risk assessments
  3. Failure to fully assess, test and audit urgent evacuation procedures and facilities
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to proactively obtain up-to-date participant medical information before departure

Wider context from the report

“(1) Preparation • The school, parents and children were not given sufficient and accurate information to allow them to make informed choices about participation and preparation for the trip. Differences in ambulance and medical facilities in Morocco were not fully explained. • Risk assessments did not include the risks associated with insufficient fitness and preparation, acclimatisation, and evacuation in the event of a medical emergency. • Individual participants were not formally assessed as to their fitness for the activity. There was an apparent onus on the parents and participants to assess fitness, though they had no real knowledge or understanding of the environment in which the child would be staying or the activities involved. • Up to date medical information about the participants was not proactively obtained shortly before departure. Evacuation: • Exertional heatstroke and (dependent upon the cause) hyponatremia, are preventable but life-threatening conditions, requiring urgent and appropriate evacuation to advanced medical facilities. In an environment such as the foothills of the Atlas Mountains, the focus is likely be on prevention, because it is clear that urgent evacuation is not usually possible. • Expedition and school leaders were not given sufficient information and training as to the dangers of heatstroke and hyponatremia, how to recognise the risk of occurrence in a given individual, how to recognise the symptoms and how to manage them if they occurred. • Procedures and facilities for urgent evacuation were not fully and formally assessed, tested and audited. Arrangements were reliant upon local agencies and individuals and facilities which had not been subjected to adequate checking and scrutiny. NOTE: The expedition company has made a number of changes since Samuel’s death, but the purpose of this report is to raise concerns more widely. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate individual risk assessment for activities.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to include fitness, preparation, acclimatisation and medical-emergency evacuation risks in risk assessments

Wider context from the report

“(1) Preparation • The school, parents and children were not given sufficient and accurate information to allow them to make informed choices about participation and preparation for the trip. Differences in ambulance and medical facilities in Morocco were not fully explained. • Risk assessments did not include the risks associated with insufficient fitness and preparation, acclimatisation, and evacuation in the event of a medical emergency. • Individual participants were not formally assessed as to their fitness for the activity. There was an apparent onus on the parents and participants to assess fitness, though they had no real knowledge or understanding of the environment in which the child would be staying or the activities involved. • Up to date medical information about the participants was not proactively obtained shortly before departure. Evacuation: • Exertional heatstroke and (dependent upon the cause) hyponatremia, are preventable but life-threatening conditions, requiring urgent and appropriate evacuation to advanced medical facilities. In an environment such as the foothills of the Atlas Mountains, the focus is likely be on prevention, because it is clear that urgent evacuation is not usually possible. • Expedition and school leaders were not given sufficient information and training as to the dangers of heatstroke and hyponatremia, how to recognise the risk of occurrence in a given individual, how to recognise the symptoms and how to manage them if they occurred. • Procedures and facilities for urgent evacuation were not fully and formally assessed, tested and audited. Arrangements were reliant upon local agencies and individuals and facilities which had not been subjected to adequate checking and scrutiny. NOTE: The expedition company has made a number of changes since Samuel’s death, but the purpose of this report is to raise concerns more widely. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to fully assess, test and audit urgent evacuation procedures and facilities

Wider context from the report

“(1) Preparation • The school, parents and children were not given sufficient and accurate information to allow them to make informed choices about participation and preparation for the trip. Differences in ambulance and medical facilities in Morocco were not fully explained. • Risk assessments did not include the risks associated with insufficient fitness and preparation, acclimatisation, and evacuation in the event of a medical emergency. • Individual participants were not formally assessed as to their fitness for the activity. There was an apparent onus on the parents and participants to assess fitness, though they had no real knowledge or understanding of the environment in which the child would be staying or the activities involved. • Up to date medical information about the participants was not proactively obtained shortly before departure. Evacuation: • Exertional heatstroke and (dependent upon the cause) hyponatremia, are preventable but life-threatening conditions, requiring urgent and appropriate evacuation to advanced medical facilities. In an environment such as the foothills of the Atlas Mountains, the focus is likely be on prevention, because it is clear that urgent evacuation is not usually possible. • Expedition and school leaders were not given sufficient information and training as to the dangers of heatstroke and hyponatremia, how to recognise the risk of occurrence in a given individual, how to recognise the symptoms and how to manage them if they occurred. • Procedures and facilities for urgent evacuation were not fully and formally assessed, tested and audited. Arrangements were reliant upon local agencies and individuals and facilities which had not been subjected to adequate checking and scrutiny. NOTE: The expedition company has made a number of changes since Samuel’s death, but the purpose of this report is to raise concerns more widely. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Limited availability of urgent evacuation to advanced medical facilities in remote expedition environments

Wider context from the report

“(1) Preparation • The school, parents and children were not given sufficient and accurate information to allow them to make informed choices about participation and preparation for the trip. Differences in ambulance and medical facilities in Morocco were not fully explained. • Risk assessments did not include the risks associated with insufficient fitness and preparation, acclimatisation, and evacuation in the event of a medical emergency. • Individual participants were not formally assessed as to their fitness for the activity. There was an apparent onus on the parents and participants to assess fitness, though they had no real knowledge or understanding of the environment in which the child would be staying or the activities involved. • Up to date medical information about the participants was not proactively obtained shortly before departure. Evacuation: • Exertional heatstroke and (dependent upon the cause) hyponatremia, are preventable but life-threatening conditions, requiring urgent and appropriate evacuation to advanced medical facilities. In an environment such as the foothills of the Atlas Mountains, the focus is likely be on prevention, because it is clear that urgent evacuation is not usually possible. • Expedition and school leaders were not given sufficient information and training as to the dangers of heatstroke and hyponatremia, how to recognise the risk of occurrence in a given individual, how to recognise the symptoms and how to manage them if they occurred. • Procedures and facilities for urgent evacuation were not fully and formally assessed, tested and audited. Arrangements were reliant upon local agencies and individuals and facilities which had not been subjected to adequate checking and scrutiny. NOTE: The expedition company has made a number of changes since Samuel’s death, but the purpose of this report is to raise concerns more widely. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to formally assess individual participants’ fitness for the activity

Wider context from the report

“(1) Preparation • The school, parents and children were not given sufficient and accurate information to allow them to make informed choices about participation and preparation for the trip. Differences in ambulance and medical facilities in Morocco were not fully explained. • Risk assessments did not include the risks associated with insufficient fitness and preparation, acclimatisation, and evacuation in the event of a medical emergency. • Individual participants were not formally assessed as to their fitness for the activity. There was an apparent onus on the parents and participants to assess fitness, though they had no real knowledge or understanding of the environment in which the child would be staying or the activities involved. • Up to date medical information about the participants was not proactively obtained shortly before departure. Evacuation: • Exertional heatstroke and (dependent upon the cause) hyponatremia, are preventable but life-threatening conditions, requiring urgent and appropriate evacuation to advanced medical facilities. In an environment such as the foothills of the Atlas Mountains, the focus is likely be on prevention, because it is clear that urgent evacuation is not usually possible. • Expedition and school leaders were not given sufficient information and training as to the dangers of heatstroke and hyponatremia, how to recognise the risk of occurrence in a given individual, how to recognise the symptoms and how to manage them if they occurred. • Procedures and facilities for urgent evacuation were not fully and formally assessed, tested and audited. Arrangements were reliant upon local agencies and individuals and facilities which had not been subjected to adequate checking and scrutiny. NOTE: The expedition company has made a number of changes since Samuel’s death, but the purpose of this report is to raise concerns more widely. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate individual risk assessment for activities.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide sufficient and accurate trip participation and preparation information

Wider context from the report

“(1) Preparation • The school, parents and children were not given sufficient and accurate information to allow them to make informed choices about participation and preparation for the trip. Differences in ambulance and medical facilities in Morocco were not fully explained. • Risk assessments did not include the risks associated with insufficient fitness and preparation, acclimatisation, and evacuation in the event of a medical emergency. • Individual participants were not formally assessed as to their fitness for the activity. There was an apparent onus on the parents and participants to assess fitness, though they had no real knowledge or understanding of the environment in which the child would be staying or the activities involved. • Up to date medical information about the participants was not proactively obtained shortly before departure. Evacuation: • Exertional heatstroke and (dependent upon the cause) hyponatremia, are preventable but life-threatening conditions, requiring urgent and appropriate evacuation to advanced medical facilities. In an environment such as the foothills of the Atlas Mountains, the focus is likely be on prevention, because it is clear that urgent evacuation is not usually possible. • Expedition and school leaders were not given sufficient information and training as to the dangers of heatstroke and hyponatremia, how to recognise the risk of occurrence in a given individual, how to recognise the symptoms and how to manage them if they occurred. • Procedures and facilities for urgent evacuation were not fully and formally assessed, tested and audited. Arrangements were reliant upon local agencies and individuals and facilities which had not been subjected to adequate checking and scrutiny. NOTE: The expedition company has made a number of changes since Samuel’s death, but the purpose of this report is to raise concerns more widely. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe planning and safety management of organised youth trips.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide expedition and school leaders with sufficient heatstroke and hyponatremia information and training

Wider context from the report

“(1) Preparation • The school, parents and children were not given sufficient and accurate information to allow them to make informed choices about participation and preparation for the trip. Differences in ambulance and medical facilities in Morocco were not fully explained. • Risk assessments did not include the risks associated with insufficient fitness and preparation, acclimatisation, and evacuation in the event of a medical emergency. • Individual participants were not formally assessed as to their fitness for the activity. There was an apparent onus on the parents and participants to assess fitness, though they had no real knowledge or understanding of the environment in which the child would be staying or the activities involved. • Up to date medical information about the participants was not proactively obtained shortly before departure. Evacuation: • Exertional heatstroke and (dependent upon the cause) hyponatremia, are preventable but life-threatening conditions, requiring urgent and appropriate evacuation to advanced medical facilities. In an environment such as the foothills of the Atlas Mountains, the focus is likely be on prevention, because it is clear that urgent evacuation is not usually possible. • Expedition and school leaders were not given sufficient information and training as to the dangers of heatstroke and hyponatremia, how to recognise the risk of occurrence in a given individual, how to recognise the symptoms and how to manage them if they occurred. • Procedures and facilities for urgent evacuation were not fully and formally assessed, tested and audited. Arrangements were reliant upon local agencies and individuals and facilities which had not been subjected to adequate checking and scrutiny. NOTE: The expedition company has made a number of changes since Samuel’s death, but the purpose of this report is to raise concerns more widely. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe planning and safety management of organised youth trips.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.