PFD report

Margaret Bailey · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 3 Sep 2025•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of ability and equipment for carers to carry out basic observations of unwell clients
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable measurement of vital signs during clinical assessmentsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable physiological observation and trend monitoring
  2. Lack of an algorithm for office call handlers to triage clients who appear unwell and determine a course of action
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable algorithmic triage of unwell patients
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.4

  1. Position

    Existing CQC regulation and reasonable initial guidance are considered sufficient; further action is not considered likely to prevent a similar incident.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of ability and equipment for carers to carry out basic observations of unwell clients

Wider context from the report

“2. There was no ability for the carer reporting that Margaret was unwell to carry out any basic observations, neither before the call to the office nor after it, in order that Margaret could be monitored as per the advice given or to at least provide a baseline for monitoring, not even a temperature reading. Most family homes, caring for children or physically vulnerable adults, would have at least a thermometer, and perhaps a pulse oximeter, maybe even a blood pressure machine. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable measurement of vital signs during clinical assessments; Unreliable physiological observation and trend monitoring.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of an algorithm for office call handlers to triage clients who appear unwell and determine a course of action

Wider context from the report

“1. On the ‘office’ receiving a call from a carer reporting, as here, that a client appears to be unwell there is no algorithm for the call handler (who tends to be an assistant manager/manager but with no medical background) to follow to triage the client, setting out why the client appears unwell and to then determine a course of action. The direction of the conversation is simply left to the ‘office’. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable algorithmic triage of unwell patients.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing CQC regulation and reasonable initial guidance are considered sufficient; further action is not considered likely to prevent a similar incident.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Care Quality Commission (CQC) requires all providers to have, at a minimum, baseline training and policies in place for staff to follow in the event a person in receipt of care experiences a deterioration in health or change in their condition or needs. This includes ensuring appropriate escalation channels are in place for staff to follow. Where a provider does use an algorithm to support the triage of phone calls, in instances such as these, CQC may review algorithms, alongside a provider’s general operating systems and day-to-day processes.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 5 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Department of Health and Social Care may be better placed to address concerns about call-handler triage algorithms.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have given careful consideration to this point and note that this report has also been sent to the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. The Department of Health and Social Care may be of greater assistance in addressing this aspect of your concerns because currently in line with CQC’s Scope of Registration the regulated activity of Personal care is defined as physical assistance given to a person in connection with:”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 2 · response
Published 5 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Amending regulations to permit homecare agencies to undertake medical or nursing observations is outside CQC’s scope and powers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In summary it is outside CQC scope and powers to amend the regulations in order that HCAs who are limited by the definition of Personal care would be allowed to take on medical or nursing observations and we have noted that you have also sent this report to The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care who may be better placed to address this issue if they believe a change in the Regulations is required.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 4 · response
Published 5 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care may be better placed to consider whether regulatory changes are required.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In summary it is outside CQC scope and powers to amend the regulations in order that HCAs who are limited by the definition of Personal care would be allowed to take on medical or nursing observations and we have noted that you have also sent this report to The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care who may be better placed to address this issue if they believe a change in the Regulations is required.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 4 · response
Published 5 September 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Ask NICE to consider developing a national standard on preventing and managing choking hazards in domiciliary and residential care settings.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 5 September 2025.
  2. 2

    Continue working closely with local commissioning teams regarding the service.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 5 September 2025.
  3. 3

    Continue monitoring Right at Home Stockport and Didsbury through provider engagement processes.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 5 September 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ask NICE to consider developing a national standard on preventing and managing choking hazards in domiciliary and residential care settings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“by choking hazards for individuals with complex care needs. To address this, we will ask NICE to consider, through its established topic selection process, the development of a national standard on the prevention and management of choking hazards in domiciliary and residential care settings. Clear guidance would help ensure carers are better equipped to identify and respond to choking risks, ultimately improving safety for vulnerable adults.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 3 · response
Published 5 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue working closely with local commissioning teams regarding the service.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Regulatory History Right at Home was registered by CQC on 02 November 2017 to provide the regulated activity of ‘personal care’ which includes physical assistance with tasks such as personal hygiene, continence care and eating. Right at Home Stockport and Didsbury was last inspected on 6 December 2022 where it was rated good in all five key questions. We subsequently carried out a review of the data available to us about Right at Home Stockport & Didsbury on 6 July 2023. We did not find evidence that we needed to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at that time. We continue to monitor this service through our provider engagement processes and work closely with the local commissioning teams.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 2 · response
Published 5 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue monitoring Right at Home Stockport and Didsbury through provider engagement processes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Regulatory History Right at Home was registered by CQC on 02 November 2017 to provide the regulated activity of ‘personal care’ which includes physical assistance with tasks such as personal hygiene, continence care and eating. Right at Home Stockport and Didsbury was last inspected on 6 December 2022 where it was rated good in all five key questions. We subsequently carried out a review of the data available to us about Right at Home Stockport & Didsbury on 6 July 2023. We did not find evidence that we needed to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at that time. We continue to monitor this service through our provider engagement processes and work closely with the local commissioning teams.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 2 · response
Published 5 September 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026