PFD report

Charles Harper · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Jan 2024•Birmingham and Solihull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to secure the tail end of coiled pipe during dispensing
  2. Insufficiency of exclusion zones alone to protect workers from springing coiled pipe tails
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Remind members to follow documented Safe Systems of Work and manufacturer instructions when using work equipment.

    Stated by British Drilling AssociationStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 January 2024.
  2. Action

    Hold a webinar discussing lessons learned, trailer and site safety measures, and their impact.

    Stated by The Pipeline Industries GuildStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 January 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The association lacks relevant expertise and experience to provide specific guidance on the equipment, incident, or coroner’s concerns.

    Stated by British Drilling AssociationUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to secure the tail end of coiled pipe during dispensing

Wider context from the report

“1. A material number of drilling and pipe dispensing companies have in the past, and continue, to dispense coiled pipe without the use of any method of securing the tail end of the pipe coil, contrary to trailer operating manual instructions. 2. The use of exclusion zones may be insufficient alone, and provide a false sense of security, to guard against the risk of a worker being struck by the tail end of a coiled pipe springing in an unpredictable way when stored energy is released at the final stage of dispensing. The trailer manufacturer in this case indicated – although their instructions make it clear the tail end of coiled pipe should always be secured to the trailer, and that clamps/straps were effective in preventing springing of the tail end of coiled pipe - an intention to do further testing around the forces generated when stored energy is released, the effectiveness of clamps and straps to restrain the tail end of coiled pipe, and consideration of cages being installed around trailers; This will take some time and will require collaboration with pipe coil manufacturers and pipe coil dispensers. The HSE indicated the facts will be considered by the relevant sector division who will decide what if any pro-active health and safety action to take; This will also take some time. It appears to me that a number of drilling/pipe dispensing companies who do not always seek to secure the tail end of pipe coil during dispensing, are likely to be members of either The Pipeline Industries Guild and/or British Drilling Association. Both organisations explain on their respective websites an aim is to improve the health and safety of its members. Both organisations are likely to be in a position to take action to alert their members to the risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficiency of exclusion zones alone to protect workers from springing coiled pipe tails

Wider context from the report

“1. A material number of drilling and pipe dispensing companies have in the past, and continue, to dispense coiled pipe without the use of any method of securing the tail end of the pipe coil, contrary to trailer operating manual instructions. 2. The use of exclusion zones may be insufficient alone, and provide a false sense of security, to guard against the risk of a worker being struck by the tail end of a coiled pipe springing in an unpredictable way when stored energy is released at the final stage of dispensing. The trailer manufacturer in this case indicated – although their instructions make it clear the tail end of coiled pipe should always be secured to the trailer, and that clamps/straps were effective in preventing springing of the tail end of coiled pipe - an intention to do further testing around the forces generated when stored energy is released, the effectiveness of clamps and straps to restrain the tail end of coiled pipe, and consideration of cages being installed around trailers; This will take some time and will require collaboration with pipe coil manufacturers and pipe coil dispensers. The HSE indicated the facts will be considered by the relevant sector division who will decide what if any pro-active health and safety action to take; This will also take some time. It appears to me that a number of drilling/pipe dispensing companies who do not always seek to secure the tail end of pipe coil during dispensing, are likely to be members of either The Pipeline Industries Guild and/or British Drilling Association. Both organisations explain on their respective websites an aim is to improve the health and safety of its members. Both organisations are likely to be in a position to take action to alert their members to the risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remind members to follow documented Safe Systems of Work and manufacturer instructions when using work equipment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whilst not in a position to provide specific guidance to members on the matters concerning the Coroner, the BDA will notify its members of this incident and share any safety alerts it receives via our Newsletter and on our website, to highlight the findings of the investigations and make them aware of the published information. Furthermore, the BDA will remind its members of the need to follow documented Safe Systems of Work (RAMS) in accordance with the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 and CDM Regulations 2015, and obligation to adhere to manufacturer instructions when utilising any work equipment in accordance with the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998.”

Source location

Response from British Drilling Association
Page 1 · response
Published 19 January 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Hold a webinar discussing lessons learned, trailer and site safety measures, and their impact.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• April – a webinar to take place to discuss the lessons learned, safety measures to be implemented both with the trailers and on site and the impact this has had. For information all our webinars are recorded and promoted throughout the year via our YouTube channel. Webinar-HS2 Bickenhill-Coil Trailer Fatality-Lessons Learnt”

Source location

Response from The Pipeline Industries Guild
Page 1 · response
Published 19 January 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The association lacks relevant expertise and experience to provide specific guidance on the equipment, incident, or coroner’s concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“For clarity, the BDA currently does not have any members who undertake horizontal directional drilling which uses the equipment and pipework which appears to the subject of particular concern. The Association therefore lacks the expertise and experience needed to comment or provide specific guidance to members on either the events around Mr Harper's tragic death or the Coroner’s concerns as set out in Section 5 of his report.”

Source location

Response from British Drilling Association
Page 1 · response
Published 19 January 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. 1

    Notify members about the incident and share relevant investigation findings and safety alerts through the newsletter and website.

    Stated by British Drilling AssociationStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 January 2024.
  2. 2

    Support proposed industry safety-standard improvements with Balfour Beatty Vinci Joint Venture and the Pipeline Industries Guild.

    Stated by British Drilling AssociationStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 19 January 2024.
  3. 3

    Continue the awards programme with a health-and-safety commendation.

    Stated by The Pipeline Industries GuildStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 January 2024.
  4. 4

    Issue a lessons-learned note to all members following discussions with BBV.

    Stated by The Pipeline Industries GuildStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 January 2024.
  5. 5

    Include safety moments as standard agenda items for executive and board meetings.

    Stated by The Pipeline Industries GuildStatus unclearThe respondent did not make the status of this action clear when they made their response on 19 January 2024.
  6. 6

    Continue raising safety awareness through technical panels.

    Stated by The Pipeline Industries GuildStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 19 January 2024.
  7. 7

    Feature the lessons-learned message and webinar output in the quarterly online publication and associated member communications.

    Stated by The Pipeline Industries GuildStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 January 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Notify members about the incident and share relevant investigation findings and safety alerts through the newsletter and website.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whilst not in a position to provide specific guidance to members on the matters concerning the Coroner, the BDA will notify its members of this incident and share any safety alerts it receives via our Newsletter and on our website, to highlight the findings of the investigations and make them aware of the published information. Furthermore, the BDA will remind its members of the need to follow documented Safe Systems of Work (RAMS) in accordance with the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 and CDM Regulations 2015, and obligation to adhere to manufacturer instructions when utilising any work equipment in accordance with the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998.”

Source location

Response from British Drilling Association
Page 1 · response
Published 19 January 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Support proposed industry safety-standard improvements with Balfour Beatty Vinci Joint Venture and the Pipeline Industries Guild.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The BDA has however been working with Balfour Beatty Vinci Joint Venture and the Pipeline Industries Guild, to understand what action they have taken following the incident and to offer support to the proposed industry safety standard improvements.”

Source location

Response from British Drilling Association
Page 1 · response
Published 19 January 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue the awards programme with a health-and-safety commendation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Internal measures: ➢ by ensuring safety moments are part of our standard agendas for all exec and board meetings ➢ continuing to raise safety awareness through our technical panels ➢ our awards will continue with the H&S commendation (which was awarded to LaySAFE – SAFFE Coiled Pipe Installation in 2023)”

Source location

Response from The Pipeline Industries Guild
Page 1 · response
Published 19 January 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue a lessons-learned note to all members following discussions with BBV.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• March – following on from conversations with BBV and the sharing of lessons learned the attached note has been issued to all our members.”

Source location

Response from The Pipeline Industries Guild
Page 1 · response
Published 19 January 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include safety moments as standard agenda items for executive and board meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Internal measures: ➢ by ensuring safety moments are part of our standard agendas for all exec and board meetings ➢ continuing to raise safety awareness through our technical panels ➢ our awards will continue with the H&S commendation (which was awarded to LaySAFE – SAFFE Coiled Pipe Installation in 2023)”

Source location

Response from The Pipeline Industries Guild
Page 1 · response
Published 19 January 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue raising safety awareness through technical panels.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Internal measures: ➢ by ensuring safety moments are part of our standard agendas for all exec and board meetings ➢ continuing to raise safety awareness through our technical panels ➢ our awards will continue with the H&S commendation (which was awarded to LaySAFE – SAFFE Coiled Pipe Installation in 2023)”

Source location

Response from The Pipeline Industries Guild
Page 1 · response
Published 19 January 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Feature the lessons-learned message and webinar output in the quarterly online publication and associated member communications.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• September – our quarterly online publication “In the Pipeline” which is issued to members and available via our website and social media platform will feature the lessons learned message & output from the webinar Guild News.”

Source location

Response from The Pipeline Industries Guild
Page 1 · response
Published 19 January 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026