PFD report

Mrs Hurrun Maksur · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 13 Dec 2021•East London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
10

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Guidance failing to accurately specify point-of-care ultrasound scanning without requiring trauma
  2. Failure to perform a point-of-care ultrasound scan to exclude intra-abdominal bleeding when pulmonary embolism is suspected
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to recognise and respond to occult internal bleedingPart of recurring concern: Unreliable recognition and management of pulmonary embolism
  3. Failure to incorporate MBRRACE guidance into national obstetric cardiac arrest guidance
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.8

  1. Action

    Share the response with the Advanced Life Support Group overseeing the Managing Medical and Obstetric Emergencies and Trauma course.

    Stated by Resuscitation Council UKStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 December 2021.
  2. Action

    Include guidance on abdominal ultrasound and massive-haemorrhage protocols for suspected haemorrhage during pregnancy-related cardiac arrest.

    Stated by Resuscitation Council UKStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 December 2021.
  3. Action

    Further emphasise excluding major bleeding before administering thrombolytic drugs for suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy.

    Stated by Resuscitation Council UKStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 December 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    Universal ultrasound requirements are limited because skilled operators and equipment may be unavailable and ultrasound could delay time-critical treatment.

    Stated by Resuscitation Council UKUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Guidance failing to accurately specify point-of-care ultrasound scanning without requiring trauma

Wider context from the report

“The guidance from MBRRACE UK 2019, provides that: Women of reproductive age, presenting to the ED collapsed, in whom a pulmonary embolism is suspected, should have a Focussed Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) scan to exclude intra-abdominal bleeding from a ruptured ectopic pregnancy especially in the presence of anaemia. A FAST scan did not take place before the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism was confirmed. If the MBRRACE guidance had been followed in this case, it is likely to have prevented the administration of Alteplase in a lady who was suffering from intra-abdominal bleeding. The 2019 MBRRACE guidance has now been incorporated into the local Trust's resuscitation policy, but has not been incorporated into the National, Resuscitation Council UK, Obstetric Cardiac Arrest guidance. Concern was raised during the course of the inquest in relation to the reference to the “FAST” scan. It was considered that reference should be to a “Point-of-Care Ultrasound Scan”, as trauma is not a necessary pre-condition for the scan to take place. Finally, concern was raised during the course of the inquest, that obstetricians do not receive specific training to identify intra-abdominal bleeding. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to perform a point-of-care ultrasound scan to exclude intra-abdominal bleeding when pulmonary embolism is suspected

Wider context from the report

“The guidance from MBRRACE UK 2019, provides that: Women of reproductive age, presenting to the ED collapsed, in whom a pulmonary embolism is suspected, should have a Focussed Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) scan to exclude intra-abdominal bleeding from a ruptured ectopic pregnancy especially in the presence of anaemia. A FAST scan did not take place before the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism was confirmed. If the MBRRACE guidance had been followed in this case, it is likely to have prevented the administration of Alteplase in a lady who was suffering from intra-abdominal bleeding. The 2019 MBRRACE guidance has now been incorporated into the local Trust's resuscitation policy, but has not been incorporated into the National, Resuscitation Council UK, Obstetric Cardiac Arrest guidance. Concern was raised during the course of the inquest in relation to the reference to the “FAST” scan. It was considered that reference should be to a “Point-of-Care Ultrasound Scan”, as trauma is not a necessary pre-condition for the scan to take place. Finally, concern was raised during the course of the inquest, that obstetricians do not receive specific training to identify intra-abdominal bleeding. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to recognise and respond to occult internal bleeding; Unreliable recognition and management of pulmonary embolism.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to incorporate MBRRACE guidance into national obstetric cardiac arrest guidance

Wider context from the report

“The guidance from MBRRACE UK 2019, provides that: Women of reproductive age, presenting to the ED collapsed, in whom a pulmonary embolism is suspected, should have a Focussed Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) scan to exclude intra-abdominal bleeding from a ruptured ectopic pregnancy especially in the presence of anaemia. A FAST scan did not take place before the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism was confirmed. If the MBRRACE guidance had been followed in this case, it is likely to have prevented the administration of Alteplase in a lady who was suffering from intra-abdominal bleeding. The 2019 MBRRACE guidance has now been incorporated into the local Trust's resuscitation policy, but has not been incorporated into the National, Resuscitation Council UK, Obstetric Cardiac Arrest guidance. Concern was raised during the course of the inquest in relation to the reference to the “FAST” scan. It was considered that reference should be to a “Point-of-Care Ultrasound Scan”, as trauma is not a necessary pre-condition for the scan to take place. Finally, concern was raised during the course of the inquest, that obstetricians do not receive specific training to identify intra-abdominal bleeding. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of specific training for obstetricians to identify intra-abdominal bleeding

Wider context from the report

“The guidance from MBRRACE UK 2019, provides that: Women of reproductive age, presenting to the ED collapsed, in whom a pulmonary embolism is suspected, should have a Focussed Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) scan to exclude intra-abdominal bleeding from a ruptured ectopic pregnancy especially in the presence of anaemia. A FAST scan did not take place before the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism was confirmed. If the MBRRACE guidance had been followed in this case, it is likely to have prevented the administration of Alteplase in a lady who was suffering from intra-abdominal bleeding. The 2019 MBRRACE guidance has now been incorporated into the local Trust's resuscitation policy, but has not been incorporated into the National, Resuscitation Council UK, Obstetric Cardiac Arrest guidance. Concern was raised during the course of the inquest in relation to the reference to the “FAST” scan. It was considered that reference should be to a “Point-of-Care Ultrasound Scan”, as trauma is not a necessary pre-condition for the scan to take place. Finally, concern was raised during the course of the inquest, that obstetricians do not receive specific training to identify intra-abdominal bleeding. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to recognise and respond to occult internal bleeding.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the response with the Advanced Life Support Group overseeing the Managing Medical and Obstetric Emergencies and Trauma course.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5. To address the variance with the MBRRACE UK 2019 guidance, RCUK will further emphasise the need to exclude major bleeding as the cause of collapse before giving thrombolytic drugs for suspected PE in pregnancy. We will also consider other learning from this case. The following areas will be reviewed and updated as necessary:”

Source location

2021-0418-Response-from-Resuscitation-Council-UK_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include guidance on abdominal ultrasound and massive-haemorrhage protocols for suspected haemorrhage during pregnancy-related cardiac arrest.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. The RCUK Advanced Life Support Manual (8th Edition, May 2021) includes the following regarding haemorrhage:”

Source location

2021-0418-Response-from-Resuscitation-Council-UK_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Further emphasise excluding major bleeding before administering thrombolytic drugs for suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5. To address the variance with the MBRRACE UK 2019 guidance, RCUK will further emphasise the need to exclude major bleeding as the cause of collapse before giving thrombolytic drugs for suspected PE in pregnancy. We will also consider other learning from this case. The following areas will be reviewed and updated as necessary:”

Source location

2021-0418-Response-from-Resuscitation-Council-UK_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Emphasise ultrasound use during advanced life support to identify reversible causes, including haemorrhage, across cardiac-arrest guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. The RCUK updates its guidelines on a regular basis using a process that is accredited by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). The most recent update was in May 2021. With regards to the use of sonography (ultrasound is the more commonly used term), the latest 2021 RCUK guidelines include:”

Source location

2021-0418-Response-from-Resuscitation-Council-UK_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include pregnancy-specific guidance to identify and treat reversible causes, with focused ultrasound available for skilled operators.

Verbatim wording from the response

“b. Specific guidelines for cardiac arrest in the pregnant patient including 'Identify and treat reversible causes (e.g. haemorrhage). Focused ultrasound by a skilled operator can be used to identify reversible causes and may also be used to assess if a fetal heart rate is present.' See https://www.resus.org.uk/library/2021-resuscitation-guidelines/special-circumstances-guidelines”

Source location

2021-0418-Response-from-Resuscitation-Council-UK_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider additional learning from the case and review relevant guidance and teaching materials for necessary updates.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5. To address the variance with the MBRRACE UK 2019 guidance, RCUK will further emphasise the need to exclude major bleeding as the cause of collapse before giving thrombolytic drugs for suspected PE in pregnancy. We will also consider other learning from this case. The following areas will be reviewed and updated as necessary:”

Source location

2021-0418-Response-from-Resuscitation-Council-UK_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss with emergency-medicine and radiology educators the need to check for intra-abdominal bleeding before anticoagulating a collapsed patient.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is our intention to engage in discussions with educators from the Faculty of Emergency Medicine and the Royal College of Radiologists to reinforce the need to check for intra-abdominal bleeding before anticoagulating a collapsed patient.”

Source location

2021-0418-Response-from-RCOG_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require early-pregnancy ultrasound practitioners to screen for ectopic pregnancy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Screening for ectopic pregnancy is a mandatory part of the ultrasound assessment in early pregnancy. Anyone undertaking a scan in early pregnancy must check for a potential ectopic pregnancy. This is specifically stated in our advice regarding ultrasound training: ultrasound-scan-guidance-vfinal.pdf (rcog.org.uk)”

Source location

2021-0418-Response-from-RCOG_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Universal ultrasound requirements are limited because skilled operators and equipment may be unavailable and ultrasound could delay time-critical treatment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“a. Firstly, RCUK is mindful that its guidelines address all cardiac arrests and that maternal cardiac arrests make up a very small proportion of these arrests. In addition the specialist skills and equipment required for ultrasound during resuscitation are not always immediately available in all settings. Any changes therefore need to be proportionate and recognise the risks of delaying time critical treatments such as fibrinolysis in patients with a suspected PE.”

Source location

2021-0418-Response-from-Resuscitation-Council-UK_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing RCUK guidance and teaching materials already address ultrasound use and reversible causes, including haemorrhage, during cardiac arrest in pregnancy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4. The RCUK ALS subcommittee's opinion is that the issues raised by the MBRRACE report and the Inquest are addressed in the most recent RCUK guidance and teaching materials. Specifically:”

Source location

2021-0418-Response-from-Resuscitation-Council-UK_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

It is not feasible to train all obstetric doctors to reliably perform FAST scans because routine opportunities and opportunities to maintain competence are insufficient.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In A&E, abdominal scanning is usually performed by doctors working within the A&E department who are trained to look for intra-abdominal bleeding; for example in cases of abdominal trauma, ruptured arterial aneurysms etc. It is very rare indeed for an obstetric doctor to be carrying out such a scan within an A&E department and most obstetric doctors would go through their whole hospital career without being asked to perform an ultrasound in these circumstances. Because of the lack of opportunities within routine O&G clinical practice, it would not be feasible to train all our doctors to be able to do this reliably even using simulation. Not only would it be difficult to organise training, they would not be able to retain their skills by regular practice - unlike doctors working in A&E.”

Source location

2021-0418-Response-from-RCOG_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Share the response with the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and liaise about whether further updates are required.

    Stated by Resuscitation Council UKStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 December 2021.
  2. 2

    Embed early-pregnancy ultrasound competencies and limits on unsupervised independent practice in the O&G core curriculum.

    Stated by Royal College of Obstetricians and GynaecologistsStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 December 2021.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Transvaginal scanning is not included as a core trainee skill because most ultrasound examinations are performed by trained ultrasonographers.

    Stated by Royal College of Obstetricians and GynaecologistsExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the response with the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and liaise about whether further updates are required.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5. To address the variance with the MBRRACE UK 2019 guidance, RCUK will further emphasise the need to exclude major bleeding as the cause of collapse before giving thrombolytic drugs for suspected PE in pregnancy. We will also consider other learning from this case. The following areas will be reviewed and updated as necessary:”

Source location

2021-0418-Response-from-Resuscitation-Council-UK_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Embed early-pregnancy ultrasound competencies and limits on unsupervised independent practice in the O&G core curriculum.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The assessments required of trainees within our core curriculum involve transabdominal scanning in early pregnancy. The College has had much discussion about transvaginal scanning as part of the core and basic curriculum, but because most ultrasound examinations are carried out by ultrasonographers we subsequently did not put this into the curriculum as a specialist skill. If a woman presents with a ruptured ectopic pregnancy, the expectation would be that the woman would be seen as an emergency, a clinical assessment made and a decision about urgency taken. The woman can be taken to theatre without a scan if urgent surgery is thought to be life-saving. This is outlined in our Capability in Practice (CiP) 9 where we state that trainees should “formulate an appropriate and individualised management plan taking into account a person’s preferences and the urgency required.””

Source location

2021-0418-Response-from-RCOG_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Transvaginal scanning is not included as a core trainee skill because most ultrasound examinations are performed by trained ultrasonographers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Within gynaecology emergency services, scanning is undertaken by a mixture of ultrasonographers trained by and working within radiology departments and O&G doctors; in any case they are all trained to check that the pregnancy they are observing is intrauterine. However, there are very few, if any, Trusts in the UK with emergency gynaecology service provision which relies on ultrasonography being carried out solely by O&G doctors.”

Source location

2021-0418-Response-from-RCOG_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026