PFD report

Linda Rose Lloyd · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 29 Aug 2014•Blackpool and the Fylde

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Insufficient staffing resilience
  2. Insufficiently robust hospital procedures
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient staffing resilience

Wider context from the report

“However, having concluded this inquest, I now write to the Trust to confirm that in my view the Trust should take action because: Although encouraged by the steps being taken, I remain concerned that the procedures in place at the hospital are insufficiently robust, and that staffing levels do not provide the Trust with sufficient resilience, to enable the Trust to minimise the risks of further deaths in similar circumstances particularly given the criticisms made by the independent expert and the number of areas of concern he raises. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficiently robust hospital procedures

Wider context from the report

“However, having concluded this inquest, I now write to the Trust to confirm that in my view the Trust should take action because: Although encouraged by the steps being taken, I remain concerned that the procedures in place at the hospital are insufficiently robust, and that staffing levels do not provide the Trust with sufficient resilience, to enable the Trust to minimise the risks of further deaths in similar circumstances particularly given the criticisms made by the independent expert and the number of areas of concern he raises. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.