PFD report

Susan Sian JONES · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Oct 2016•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
7

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised7

  1. Lack of protocol and training for monitoring members of the public in police stations who are not in police custody
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable supervision of members of the public on station premises
  2. Failure to treat an unresponsive individual as a medical emergency
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable emergency response to patient collapse
  3. Failure to recognise snoring as a possible sign of life-threatening partial airway obstruction
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to recognise breathing emergencies during police encounters
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of protocol and training for monitoring members of the public in police stations who are not in police custody

Wider context from the report

“I heard evidence at inquest that there is no specific protocol or training regarding the monitoring of members of the public in police stations who are not in police custody. This was acknowledged by the Metropolitan Police Service to be a gap. In seeking to plug this gap by way of policy development, it may be helpful for you to consider the following. • Snoring is not always a reassuring sign and may indicate a partial airway obstruction. A partial airway obstruction can be life threatening. • In considering whether snoring is sign for concern, the fact of intoxication by alcohol or drugs or both – even if the individual is capable – is highly relevant. In addition, officers should bear in mind that members of the public sometimes lie about alcohol or drug taking, even when there seems no obvious reason to lie. • Any relevant information gleaned by officers, for example that an individual is a methadone user, should be passed on to colleagues with responsibility (and preferably recorded in some way or other). • The only way of determining whether snoring is benign is by rousing, most particularly by waking the individual and determining whether they are able to sit up and hold a conversation. • The rousing itself may have a therapeutic purpose even over and above its value as a tool of assessment. And an unresponsive individual must be treated as a medical emergency. • All police officers and staff should know the location of the nearest defibrillator. If they are attending a police station for the first time, they should make themselves aware of its location. In terms of feedback regarding officer training generally and for the officer who led this resuscitation attempt, I should also point out that after Ms Jones’s cardiorespiratory arrest, the cardiopulmonary resuscitation given was later noted by a paramedic to be extremely effective. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable supervision of members of the public on station premises.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to treat an unresponsive individual as a medical emergency

Wider context from the report

“I heard evidence at inquest that there is no specific protocol or training regarding the monitoring of members of the public in police stations who are not in police custody. This was acknowledged by the Metropolitan Police Service to be a gap. In seeking to plug this gap by way of policy development, it may be helpful for you to consider the following. • Snoring is not always a reassuring sign and may indicate a partial airway obstruction. A partial airway obstruction can be life threatening. • In considering whether snoring is sign for concern, the fact of intoxication by alcohol or drugs or both – even if the individual is capable – is highly relevant. In addition, officers should bear in mind that members of the public sometimes lie about alcohol or drug taking, even when there seems no obvious reason to lie. • Any relevant information gleaned by officers, for example that an individual is a methadone user, should be passed on to colleagues with responsibility (and preferably recorded in some way or other). • The only way of determining whether snoring is benign is by rousing, most particularly by waking the individual and determining whether they are able to sit up and hold a conversation. • The rousing itself may have a therapeutic purpose even over and above its value as a tool of assessment. And an unresponsive individual must be treated as a medical emergency. • All police officers and staff should know the location of the nearest defibrillator. If they are attending a police station for the first time, they should make themselves aware of its location. In terms of feedback regarding officer training generally and for the officer who led this resuscitation attempt, I should also point out that after Ms Jones’s cardiorespiratory arrest, the cardiopulmonary resuscitation given was later noted by a paramedic to be extremely effective. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable emergency response to patient collapse.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to recognise snoring as a possible sign of life-threatening partial airway obstruction

Wider context from the report

“I heard evidence at inquest that there is no specific protocol or training regarding the monitoring of members of the public in police stations who are not in police custody. This was acknowledged by the Metropolitan Police Service to be a gap. In seeking to plug this gap by way of policy development, it may be helpful for you to consider the following. • Snoring is not always a reassuring sign and may indicate a partial airway obstruction. A partial airway obstruction can be life threatening. • In considering whether snoring is sign for concern, the fact of intoxication by alcohol or drugs or both – even if the individual is capable – is highly relevant. In addition, officers should bear in mind that members of the public sometimes lie about alcohol or drug taking, even when there seems no obvious reason to lie. • Any relevant information gleaned by officers, for example that an individual is a methadone user, should be passed on to colleagues with responsibility (and preferably recorded in some way or other). • The only way of determining whether snoring is benign is by rousing, most particularly by waking the individual and determining whether they are able to sit up and hold a conversation. • The rousing itself may have a therapeutic purpose even over and above its value as a tool of assessment. And an unresponsive individual must be treated as a medical emergency. • All police officers and staff should know the location of the nearest defibrillator. If they are attending a police station for the first time, they should make themselves aware of its location. In terms of feedback regarding officer training generally and for the officer who led this resuscitation attempt, I should also point out that after Ms Jones’s cardiorespiratory arrest, the cardiopulmonary resuscitation given was later noted by a paramedic to be extremely effective. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to recognise breathing emergencies during police encounters.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of police officers and staff to know the location of the nearest defibrillator

Wider context from the report

“I heard evidence at inquest that there is no specific protocol or training regarding the monitoring of members of the public in police stations who are not in police custody. This was acknowledged by the Metropolitan Police Service to be a gap. In seeking to plug this gap by way of policy development, it may be helpful for you to consider the following. • Snoring is not always a reassuring sign and may indicate a partial airway obstruction. A partial airway obstruction can be life threatening. • In considering whether snoring is sign for concern, the fact of intoxication by alcohol or drugs or both – even if the individual is capable – is highly relevant. In addition, officers should bear in mind that members of the public sometimes lie about alcohol or drug taking, even when there seems no obvious reason to lie. • Any relevant information gleaned by officers, for example that an individual is a methadone user, should be passed on to colleagues with responsibility (and preferably recorded in some way or other). • The only way of determining whether snoring is benign is by rousing, most particularly by waking the individual and determining whether they are able to sit up and hold a conversation. • The rousing itself may have a therapeutic purpose even over and above its value as a tool of assessment. And an unresponsive individual must be treated as a medical emergency. • All police officers and staff should know the location of the nearest defibrillator. If they are attending a police station for the first time, they should make themselves aware of its location. In terms of feedback regarding officer training generally and for the officer who led this resuscitation attempt, I should also point out that after Ms Jones’s cardiorespiratory arrest, the cardiopulmonary resuscitation given was later noted by a paramedic to be extremely effective. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to pass on and record relevant information about members of the public

Wider context from the report

“I heard evidence at inquest that there is no specific protocol or training regarding the monitoring of members of the public in police stations who are not in police custody. This was acknowledged by the Metropolitan Police Service to be a gap. In seeking to plug this gap by way of policy development, it may be helpful for you to consider the following. • Snoring is not always a reassuring sign and may indicate a partial airway obstruction. A partial airway obstruction can be life threatening. • In considering whether snoring is sign for concern, the fact of intoxication by alcohol or drugs or both – even if the individual is capable – is highly relevant. In addition, officers should bear in mind that members of the public sometimes lie about alcohol or drug taking, even when there seems no obvious reason to lie. • Any relevant information gleaned by officers, for example that an individual is a methadone user, should be passed on to colleagues with responsibility (and preferably recorded in some way or other). • The only way of determining whether snoring is benign is by rousing, most particularly by waking the individual and determining whether they are able to sit up and hold a conversation. • The rousing itself may have a therapeutic purpose even over and above its value as a tool of assessment. And an unresponsive individual must be treated as a medical emergency. • All police officers and staff should know the location of the nearest defibrillator. If they are attending a police station for the first time, they should make themselves aware of its location. In terms of feedback regarding officer training generally and for the officer who led this resuscitation attempt, I should also point out that after Ms Jones’s cardiorespiratory arrest, the cardiopulmonary resuscitation given was later noted by a paramedic to be extremely effective. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to rouse individuals to assess whether snoring is benign

Wider context from the report

“I heard evidence at inquest that there is no specific protocol or training regarding the monitoring of members of the public in police stations who are not in police custody. This was acknowledged by the Metropolitan Police Service to be a gap. In seeking to plug this gap by way of policy development, it may be helpful for you to consider the following. • Snoring is not always a reassuring sign and may indicate a partial airway obstruction. A partial airway obstruction can be life threatening. • In considering whether snoring is sign for concern, the fact of intoxication by alcohol or drugs or both – even if the individual is capable – is highly relevant. In addition, officers should bear in mind that members of the public sometimes lie about alcohol or drug taking, even when there seems no obvious reason to lie. • Any relevant information gleaned by officers, for example that an individual is a methadone user, should be passed on to colleagues with responsibility (and preferably recorded in some way or other). • The only way of determining whether snoring is benign is by rousing, most particularly by waking the individual and determining whether they are able to sit up and hold a conversation. • The rousing itself may have a therapeutic purpose even over and above its value as a tool of assessment. And an unresponsive individual must be treated as a medical emergency. • All police officers and staff should know the location of the nearest defibrillator. If they are attending a police station for the first time, they should make themselves aware of its location. In terms of feedback regarding officer training generally and for the officer who led this resuscitation attempt, I should also point out that after Ms Jones’s cardiorespiratory arrest, the cardiopulmonary resuscitation given was later noted by a paramedic to be extremely effective. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to recognise breathing emergencies during police encounters.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to account for alcohol or drug intoxication when assessing snoring

Wider context from the report

“I heard evidence at inquest that there is no specific protocol or training regarding the monitoring of members of the public in police stations who are not in police custody. This was acknowledged by the Metropolitan Police Service to be a gap. In seeking to plug this gap by way of policy development, it may be helpful for you to consider the following. • Snoring is not always a reassuring sign and may indicate a partial airway obstruction. A partial airway obstruction can be life threatening. • In considering whether snoring is sign for concern, the fact of intoxication by alcohol or drugs or both – even if the individual is capable – is highly relevant. In addition, officers should bear in mind that members of the public sometimes lie about alcohol or drug taking, even when there seems no obvious reason to lie. • Any relevant information gleaned by officers, for example that an individual is a methadone user, should be passed on to colleagues with responsibility (and preferably recorded in some way or other). • The only way of determining whether snoring is benign is by rousing, most particularly by waking the individual and determining whether they are able to sit up and hold a conversation. • The rousing itself may have a therapeutic purpose even over and above its value as a tool of assessment. And an unresponsive individual must be treated as a medical emergency. • All police officers and staff should know the location of the nearest defibrillator. If they are attending a police station for the first time, they should make themselves aware of its location. In terms of feedback regarding officer training generally and for the officer who led this resuscitation attempt, I should also point out that after Ms Jones’s cardiorespiratory arrest, the cardiopulmonary resuscitation given was later noted by a paramedic to be extremely effective. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to recognise breathing emergencies during police encounters.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.