PFD report

Elisa Fuller · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 17 Oct 2019•Gloucestershire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Insufficient support and systems for junior midwives and junior doctors to escalate concerns to senior colleagues
  2. Insufficient understanding of the need to retain placentas post delivery for a specified period before disposal
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.9

  1. Action

    Debrief midwifery staff to explore and understand barriers to escalation.

    Stated by Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 17 October 2019.
  2. Action

    Deliver mandatory midwife update training incorporating lessons from incidents and expectations for escalating concerns.

    Stated by Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 17 October 2019.
  3. Action

    Deliver PROMPT multi-professional training covering human factors, resilience, teamwork and effective communication relevant to escalation.

    Stated by Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 17 October 2019.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient support and systems for junior midwives and junior doctors to escalate concerns to senior colleagues

Wider context from the report

“Although I acknowledge that the Trust have put in place systems to address the second concern. In relation to the first concern, further training has been put in place. However there remains work to be done. (1) Whether there is appropriate support and systems in place to encourage Junior Midwives and Junior Doctors to escalate any concerns they have to more Senior Colleagues, (2) Whether there is sufficient understanding of the need to retain placentas post delivery for a specified time period prior to disposal. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient understanding of the need to retain placentas post delivery for a specified period before disposal

Wider context from the report

“Although I acknowledge that the Trust have put in place systems to address the second concern. In relation to the first concern, further training has been put in place. However there remains work to be done. (1) Whether there is appropriate support and systems in place to encourage Junior Midwives and Junior Doctors to escalate any concerns they have to more Senior Colleagues, (2) Whether there is sufficient understanding of the need to retain placentas post delivery for a specified time period prior to disposal. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Debrief midwifery staff to explore and understand barriers to escalation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Finally, I can also add that as a result of the inquest into Elisa’s death, the following additional review and learning has taken place, for the clinical staff involved, and for any interested colleagues:”

Source location

2019-0481-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 17 October 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver mandatory midwife update training incorporating lessons from incidents and expectations for escalating concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I. Mandatory Update day - Midwives”

Source location

2019-0481-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 17 October 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver PROMPT multi-professional training covering human factors, resilience, teamwork and effective communication relevant to escalation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“IV. Practical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training – PROMPT’ - Midwives and Doctors”

Source location

2019-0481-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 17 October 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Retain and identify every placenta for 24 hours after birth, supported by a new procedure, teaching sessions, guidance and signage.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, in response to the evidence heard at the inquest from the pathologist that his determination of the cause of death was considerably limited by the absence of the placenta, the Trust has revised its policy on retention of placentas so that all placentas are retained for 24 hours after birth, and are sufficiently identified so that they can be reliably retrieved in the event that there are any subsequent adverse clinical events affecting the baby.”

Source location

2019-0481-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 17 October 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide rotation-day training for new, returning and transitioning midwives, including escalation, communication, assertiveness and professional behaviour.

Verbatim wording from the response

“III. Rotation Day programme - Midwives”

Source location

2019-0481-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 17 October 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use the SBAR structured referral tool to formalise escalation reasons and patient-review plans for midwives and doctors.

Verbatim wording from the response

“II. SBAR referral tool - Midwives and Doctors”

Source location

2019-0481-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 17 October 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Hold a staff event addressing workplace factors affecting performance, including team roles, respectful communication and support for less experienced staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Finally, I can also add that as a result of the inquest into Elisa’s death, the following additional review and learning has taken place, for the clinical staff involved, and for any interested colleagues:”

Source location

2019-0481-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 17 October 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Launch the updated Newborn Early Warning Trigger and Track chart in all relevant clinical areas.

Verbatim wording from the response

“V. Newborn Early Warning Observation charts – documented by Midwives, consulted by Doctors”

Source location

2019-0481-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 17 October 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Hold a Trust Safety Department Black Box learning event to explore barriers to escalation and improve multiprofessional learning from incidents.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Finally, I can also add that as a result of the inquest into Elisa’s death, the following additional review and learning has taken place, for the clinical staff involved, and for any interested colleagues:”

Source location

2019-0481-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 17 October 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026