PFD report

Magdalen Bernadette Dwerryhouse · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 29 May 2014•Manchester West

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to respond promptly to failed visits caused by lack of access
  2. Absence of a partnership agreement between the fire service and mental health trust
  3. Failure to arrange appointments with vulnerable individuals in accordance with Health Professional directions
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Action

    Roll out the amended missed-appointment and failed-visit guidance across all community teams.

    Stated by North West Boroughs Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 29 May 2014.
  2. Action

    Introduce operational protocols for staff use of the Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service partnership agreement.

    Stated by North West Boroughs Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 29 May 2014.
  3. Action

    Provide reciprocal mental-health support, fire-safety referrals and training with Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service under the partnership.

    Stated by North West Boroughs Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 29 May 2014.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to respond promptly to failed visits caused by lack of access

Wider context from the report

“ii. I have further concerns with regard to procedures to be undertaken if a visit fails for lack of access including contact with family and the original referrer to rearrange an appointment as soon as possible. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Absence of a partnership agreement between the fire service and mental health trust

Wider context from the report

“iii. The absence of any partnership agreement between the Greater Manchester Fire Service and 5 Boroughs NHS Foundation Trust which has failed to develop over the last two years and which is essential to allow the Fire Service to take action to prevent future deaths. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to arrange appointments with vulnerable individuals in accordance with Health Professional directions

Wider context from the report

“i. The systems and procedures within 5 Boroughs Partnership NHS Foundation Trust with regard to the arrangements of appointments with vulnerable individuals particularly when directions are given by a Health Professional, namely ████████ in the case of the deceased. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Roll out the amended missed-appointment and failed-visit guidance across all community teams.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have implemented a full review of the operational guidance that all community teams work to. To address the areas of concern raised within our internal investigation and also by yourself, we have significantly amended the advice and guidance issued to our clinicians around what action to take if a service user does not attend an appointment, or is not at home when a planned appointment occurs.”

Source location

2014-0244-Response-by-5-Borough-Partnership-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 29 May 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce operational protocols for staff use of the Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service partnership agreement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To accompany the agreement, operational protocols to assist staff with how to best utilise this partnership agreement have been drawn up and are also ready for introduction on completion of the partnership agreement.”

Source location

2014-0244-Response-by-5-Borough-Partnership-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 29 May 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide reciprocal mental-health support, fire-safety referrals and training with Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service under the partnership.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As part of this agreement, we will provide GMFRS with assistance if they feel someone who has utilised their service may have a mental health concern, and reciprocally, our Trust will consider a referral to the GMFRS if a fire safety assessment is considered appropriate. This arrangement also provides reciprocal training arrangements for both organisations. Similar processes are either in place or in draft with other Fire and Rescue services in other parts of our catchment area.”

Source location

2014-0244-Response-by-5-Borough-Partnership-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 29 May 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Apply interim missed-visit procedures across Assessment Teams, including referrer notification, case review after repeated non-attendance, family contact, rescheduling and documentation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As an interim measure before we are able to fully implement this new guidance across all community teams, the Assistant Director of Operations has instructed an immediate change in practice within all our Assessment Teams. The changes are stated below”

Source location

2014-0244-Response-by-5-Borough-Partnership-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 29 May 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Secure executive review and formal signing of the partnership agreement with Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There was a further meeting between 5 Boroughs NHS Partnership foundation Trust and Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service on the 18th July to establish agreement for the principles set out in the partnership agreement, leading to formal signing in the near future.”

Source location

2014-0244-Response-by-5-Borough-Partnership-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 29 May 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete and agree in principle an information-sharing agreement with Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since Mrs Dwerryhouses death, significant work and progress has been made with Greater Manchester fire service in preparation for the final partnership agreement being signed.”

Source location

2014-0244-Response-by-5-Borough-Partnership-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 29 May 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete the review and amendment of operational guidance for community teams handling missed appointments and failed home visits.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have implemented a full review of the operational guidance that all community teams work to. To address the areas of concern raised within our internal investigation and also by yourself, we have significantly amended the advice and guidance issued to our clinicians around what action to take if a service user does not attend an appointment, or is not at home when a planned appointment occurs.”

Source location

2014-0244-Response-by-5-Borough-Partnership-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 29 May 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026