PFD report

Darren Barry WILLIAMS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Nov 2019•Milton Keynes

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to take relevant information from previous ACCTs into consideration when opening a new ACCT
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes
  2. Lack of Healthcare attendance at ACCT reviews
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to take relevant information from previous ACCTs into consideration when opening a new ACCT

Wider context from the report

“I have two concerns; firstly, it became apparent during the course of the evidence that ACCT reviews were being conducted on many occasions without someone from Healthcare being in attendance. Secondly in this particular case there were four separate ACCT’s and it was apparent that not all relevant information available from previous ACCT’s was taken into consideration when a new ACCT was opened. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of Healthcare attendance at ACCT reviews

Wider context from the report

“I have two concerns; firstly, it became apparent during the course of the evidence that ACCT reviews were being conducted on many occasions without someone from Healthcare being in attendance. Secondly in this particular case there were four separate ACCT’s and it was apparent that not all relevant information available from previous ACCT’s was taken into consideration when a new ACCT was opened. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.