PFD report

Rubana PATHAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 18 Mar 2016•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to disseminate information that toxins can suppress signs of local inflammation in patients at risk of sepsis
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Disseminate the literature search and the need for heightened suspicion of staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome to all Trust doctors.

    Stated by Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 March 2016.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to disseminate information that toxins can suppress signs of local inflammation in patients at risk of sepsis

Wider context from the report

“Although Ms Pathan’s MENTOR breast implant was suspected as being the cause of her sepsis and was removed on the evening of Saturday, 7 November 2015, her surgeon told me at inquest that she still did not believe this to be the cause, because she found no pus or localised redness. However, one of the treating microbiologists undertook a literature search after Ms Pathan’s death and discovered that the toxin found to be responsible for her illness can supress signs of local inflammation such as the production of pus. Although this is a rare occurrence, it seems to me that the information could usefully be disseminated among those likely to be caring for patients who may be at risk of developing sepsis, both by the hospital and by the implant manufacturer. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate the literature search and the need for heightened suspicion of staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome to all Trust doctors.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. I have highlighted the need to have a high index of suspicion for sepsis associated with Staphylococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome, and shared ████████ detailed literature search, with all doctors in the Trust by email.”

Source location

2016-0113-Response-by-Homerton-University-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 18 March 2016

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Discuss the case at a Hospital Grand Round to share learning about the occurrence.

    Stated by Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 18 March 2016.
  2. 2

    Commission an evidence and literature search on surgical-site staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome and benign-looking wounds.

    Stated by Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 March 2016.
  3. 3

    Broaden the sepsis programme to improve recognition, escalation and treatment of potential sepsis on inpatient wards.

    Stated by Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 18 March 2016.
  4. 4

    Direct focus towards early recognition and treatment of patients with sepsis through the Improving Quality programme.

    Stated by Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 March 2016.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss the case at a Hospital Grand Round to share learning about the occurrence.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. The case will be discussed in detail at a Hospital Grand Round, in order to ensure that the organisation learns as much as possible from this sad occurrence. The Grand Round was scheduled to take place on 26th April, but unfortunately had to be postponed due to the junior doctors’ industrial action which took place that day, so will take place on 28th June.”

Source location

2016-0113-Response-by-Homerton-University-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 18 March 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Commission an evidence and literature search on surgical-site staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome and benign-looking wounds.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. I requested that ████████, the microbiologist who gave evidence at the inquest, perform an evidence and literature search on surgical site Staphylococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome, with particular reference to suppression of pus formation resulting in benign-looking wounds.”

Source location

2016-0113-Response-by-Homerton-University-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 18 March 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Broaden the sepsis programme to improve recognition, escalation and treatment of potential sepsis on inpatient wards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4. The Trust has directed particular focus on encouraging early recognition and treatment of patients with sepsis, as part of its Improving Quality programme. In Quarter 4 of 2015-16 we were extremely pleased that all patients admitted to Homerton with severe sepsis received antibiotics within one hour. In 2016/17, we are broadening the focus of this programme, seeking to improve the recognition, escalation and treatment of patients on our in-patient wards with potential sepsis.”

Source location

2016-0113-Response-by-Homerton-University-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 18 March 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Direct focus towards early recognition and treatment of patients with sepsis through the Improving Quality programme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4. The Trust has directed particular focus on encouraging early recognition and treatment of patients with sepsis, as part of its Improving Quality programme. In Quarter 4 of 2015-16 we were extremely pleased that all patients admitted to Homerton with severe sepsis received antibiotics within one hour. In 2016/17, we are broadening the focus of this programme, seeking to improve the recognition, escalation and treatment of patients on our in-patient wards with potential sepsis.”

Source location

2016-0113-Response-by-Homerton-University-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 18 March 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026