Isaac Jakob NEWTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 14 Sep 2020•Blackpool and the Fylde

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Continuation of unsafe sleeping practices by parents
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure safe sleeping arrangements for infants and children

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Department of Health and Social Care

    Work with stakeholders to develop shared tools and processes helping frontline professionals promote safer sleeping among families with children at risk.

  2. Department of Health and Social Care

    Consider embedding learning from the review in the Healthy Child Programme’s transition-to-parenthood and early-weeks provision.

  3. Department of Health and Social Care

    Create and release short films promoting safe sleeping and co-sleeping advice during the pandemic and when babies will not sleep.

  4. Department of Health and Social Care

    Conduct the major review of improving health outcomes for babies and young children, including barriers affecting development and vulnerability.

  5. Department of Health and Social Care

    Publish refreshed Healthy Child Programme commissioning and delivery guidance incorporating safer-sleeping discussions at specified professional contacts.

  6. Department of Health and Social Care

    Explore cross-checking child death review data against serious incident notifications to support local and national learning.

  7. Department of Health and Social Care

    Publish refreshed Healthy Child Programme High Impact Areas guidance highlighting hazards including cot bumpers, sleeping pods and SIDS risks.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Department of Health and Social Care

    Existing NICE guidance remains current and healthcare professionals are expected to follow it pending the updated guideline’s publication.

    Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continuation of unsafe sleeping practices by parents

Wider context from the report

“(1)My concern relates to the risk posed to young infants by unsafe sleeping practices. This inquest involved a young child who was sleeping in a bed with a Parent and a Half – sibling. This was the fourth inquest I have concluded in 2020 that has involved a child that has died whilst sleeping in or on the parental bed. All of these inquests have involved relatively young parents. In three of the four inquests alcohol or drug use was a factor. Although guidance is provided to new parents about the dangers posed by an unsafe sleeping environment, I am concerned that the message is not being appreciated and / or followed. The evidence received from Isaac’s Parents was illustrative. His Mother informed the court that she had received advice from health visitors about the potential risks of a child co-sleeping with an adult but had clearly chosen not to follow the advice despite having a suitable cot available for him to sleep in. Isaac’s Father by contrast told the court that he could not recall receiving such advice. He gave the impression that he was unaware that the child may be at risk were he to use cannabis before co-sleeping, and in preferring to co – sleep rather than place Isaac in the cot he was following the practice he knew Isaac’s Mother adopted when Isaac was residing with her. Isaac’s Mother gave the impression that Isaac was not in jeopardy when he slept with her and his Half – sibling during the night because there was no risk that she would unknowingly roll over during the night. I am concerned that despite efforts to provide guidance to parents about what may amount to an unsafe sleeping environment some parents are continuing to place often very young children at risk. I concluded that it would be remiss of me as Senior Coroner for this coronial area were I not to raise this concern in light of the number of inquests we have concluded during which an unsafe sleeping environment has been adjudged to have played a role in the child’s death. I am aware that the Department of Health & Social Care did in July of this year publish details of a major review into improving health outcomes for babies and young children and so I have chosen to forward this letter to the Parliamentary Under Secretary with responsibility for that review as the concern I raise may be of relevance. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure safe sleeping arrangements for infants and children.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with stakeholders to develop shared tools and processes helping frontline professionals promote safer sleeping among families with children at risk.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The report, which you have referenced, highlights that despite broad success embedding safer sleeping messages with parents, there are still persistent issues for some families when it comes to acting on those lessons. The report is clear that this is a complex issue. We will implement the three national recommendations:”

Source location

2020-0174-Response-from-Dept-of-Health-and-Social-Care_Redacted.pdf
Page 2 · response
Published 16 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider embedding learning from the review in the Healthy Child Programme’s transition-to-parenthood and early-weeks provision.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The report, which you have referenced, highlights that despite broad success embedding safer sleeping messages with parents, there are still persistent issues for some families when it comes to acting on those lessons. The report is clear that this is a complex issue. We will implement the three national recommendations:”

Source location

2020-0174-Response-from-Dept-of-Health-and-Social-Care_Redacted.pdf
Page 2 · response
Published 16 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Create and release short films promoting safe sleeping and co-sleeping advice during the pandemic and when babies will not sleep.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To promote safe sleeping messages regarding babies and co-sleeping, Public Health England, working with the Lullaby Trust, have created two short films that have been released this year. The films give advice on caring for babies during the Covid-19 pandemic⁵, and when your baby won’t sleep⁶.”

Source location

2020-0174-Response-from-Dept-of-Health-and-Social-Care_Redacted.pdf
Page 3 · response
Published 16 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct the major review of improving health outcomes for babies and young children, including barriers affecting development and vulnerability.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Finally, in July 2020, a major new review into improving health outcomes in babies and young children was launched and is being led by the Early Years Health Adviser, Andrea Leadsom MP⁷. The review will consider the barriers that impact on early-years development, including social and emotional factors and early childhood experiences and seek to show how to reduce impacts of vulnerability and adverse childhood experiences in this stage of life.”

Source location

2020-0174-Response-from-Dept-of-Health-and-Social-Care_Redacted.pdf
Page 3 · response
Published 16 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish refreshed Healthy Child Programme commissioning and delivery guidance incorporating safer-sleeping discussions at specified professional contacts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Public Health England advise that in Quarter 3, 2020/21, it plans to publish refreshed commissioning and delivery guidance for the Healthy Child Programme, that includes safer sleeping discussions at specific interactions between health visitors and school nurses with parents and carers. In addition, Public Health England plans to publish refreshed High Impact Areas for the Healthy Child Programme in Q3, 2020/21 which will highlight the potential for harm from new hazards such as cot bumpers and sleeping pods and the dangers associated with SIDS.”

Source location

2020-0174-Response-from-Dept-of-Health-and-Social-Care_Redacted.pdf
Page 3 · response
Published 16 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Explore cross-checking child death review data against serious incident notifications to support local and national learning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The report, which you have referenced, highlights that despite broad success embedding safer sleeping messages with parents, there are still persistent issues for some families when it comes to acting on those lessons. The report is clear that this is a complex issue. We will implement the three national recommendations:”

Source location

2020-0174-Response-from-Dept-of-Health-and-Social-Care_Redacted.pdf
Page 2 · response
Published 16 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish refreshed Healthy Child Programme High Impact Areas guidance highlighting hazards including cot bumpers, sleeping pods and SIDS risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Public Health England advise that in Quarter 3, 2020/21, it plans to publish refreshed commissioning and delivery guidance for the Healthy Child Programme, that includes safer sleeping discussions at specific interactions between health visitors and school nurses with parents and carers. In addition, Public Health England plans to publish refreshed High Impact Areas for the Healthy Child Programme in Q3, 2020/21 which will highlight the potential for harm from new hazards such as cot bumpers and sleeping pods and the dangers associated with SIDS.”

Source location

2020-0174-Response-from-Dept-of-Health-and-Social-Care_Redacted.pdf
Page 3 · response
Published 16 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing NICE guidance remains current and healthcare professionals are expected to follow it pending the updated guideline’s publication.

Verbatim wording from the response

“You may wish to note that CG37 is in the process of being fully updated and consultation on the updated draft guideline ends on 27 November 2020⁴. Until the expected publication of the updated guideline in April 2021, CG37 remains current and health professionals are expected to adhere to and provide care in line with NICE guidance. I am advised by NICE that the concerns in your report will be considered as part of the guideline update.”

Source location

2020-0174-Response-from-Dept-of-Health-and-Social-Care_Redacted.pdf
Page 2 · response
Published 16 November 2020

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026