Colin Tyson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 Mar 2015•South Yorkshire (Eastern)

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. GPs' interpretation of patient confidentiality preventing concerned family members from passing pertinent information about vulnerable persons at potential risk of suicide
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable confidentiality arrangements for sharing safety-critical welfare information

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. NHS England Yorkshire and the Humber and NHS Wakefield Clinical Commissioning Group

    Include the advice sheet's guidance in safeguarding training offered to practices.

  2. NHS England Yorkshire and the Humber and NHS Wakefield Clinical Commissioning Group

    Disseminate the advice sheet to GPs through Local Medical Committees in every district.

  3. NHS England Yorkshire and the Humber and NHS Wakefield Clinical Commissioning Group

    Develop an advice sheet for GP practices on responding to third-party concerns and information-sharing requests.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

GPs' interpretation of patient confidentiality preventing concerned family members from passing pertinent information about vulnerable persons at potential risk of suicide

Wider context from the report

“(1) Concern regarding GPs interpretation of patient confidentiality preventing concerned family members passing pertinent information regarding vulnerable persons who are potentially at risk of suicide. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable confidentiality arrangements for sharing safety-critical welfare information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include the advice sheet's guidance in safeguarding training offered to practices.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I attach a copy of this advice sheet for your information. It will be shared with all GP practices in Wakefield by the CCG and across Yorkshire and the Humber by the safeguarding network. In addition we will disseminate this information to all GPs in conjunction with the Local Medical Committees in every district. The advice contained within the advice sheet will also form part of the training that is offered to practices in relation to the safeguarding of adults and children.”

Source location

2015-0080-Response-by-NHS-England
Page 1 · response
Published 4 March 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate the advice sheet to GPs through Local Medical Committees in every district.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I attach a copy of this advice sheet for your information. It will be shared with all GP practices in Wakefield by the CCG and across Yorkshire and the Humber by the safeguarding network. In addition we will disseminate this information to all GPs in conjunction with the Local Medical Committees in every district. The advice contained within the advice sheet will also form part of the training that is offered to practices in relation to the safeguarding of adults and children.”

Source location

2015-0080-Response-by-NHS-England
Page 1 · response
Published 4 March 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop an advice sheet for GP practices on responding to third-party concerns and information-sharing requests.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have worked together to develop an advice sheet for GP practices on the appropriate response when third parties raise concerns or request sharing of information about a patient registered at the practice. As you rightly noted this is an area which many practices do not feel confident about and hence there is a risk that relevant and important information does not reach the patient’s GP.”

Source location

2015-0080-Response-by-NHS-England
Page 1 · response
Published 4 March 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026