PFD report

Aleysha Martine Karla McLoughlin · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 8 Apr 2015•Manchester West

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Unavailability of a shared formal pathway of help for young people who resist engagement
  2. Failure to hold urgent multi-agency discussions involving all relevant agencies for young people at risk of self-harm
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to convene coordinated professional case-planning discussions for safety concernsPart of recurring concern: Inadequate multi-agency safeguarding coordination
  3. Insufficient agency capacity to address self-harm appropriately
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Support the Public Service Transformation Network and Early Intervention Foundation in co-designing better outcomes for vulnerable people.

    Stated by Department for Education (DfE) and the Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLGStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 8 April 2015.
  2. Action

    Support local authorities in delivering the expanded troubled families programme to improve coordinated services for vulnerable families.

    Stated by Department for Education (DfE) and the Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLGStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 8 April 2015.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Local Safeguarding Children Boards are responsible for safeguarding children and ensuring local agencies’ effectiveness.

    Stated by Department for Education (DfE) and the Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLGRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of a shared formal pathway of help for young people who resist engagement

Wider context from the report

“(4) That it should be considered that a particular pathway of help for young people who resist engagement should be developed. There was no evidence that any such formal pathway had been shared at the present time. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to hold urgent multi-agency discussions involving all relevant agencies for young people at risk of self-harm

Wider context from the report

“(3) That it should be considered that systems such as those now being developed in Bolton should be further developed so as to ensure that multi agency discussions involving all relevant agencies are held urgently for those at risk of self harm and particularly for those who do not engage. Evidence was given that meetings concerning Aleysha Martine Karla McLoughlin did not include the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services although evidence was given that their input would have been valuable. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to convene coordinated professional case-planning discussions for safety concerns; Inadequate multi-agency safeguarding coordination.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient agency capacity to address self-harm appropriately

Wider context from the report

“(5) That a review of the capacity of the agencies involved in helping young people who are self harming to address those matters appropriately should be considered. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a system encouraging young people to report another young person’s self-harm to those able to help

Wider context from the report

“(2) That it should be considered that additional information and encouragement could be offered to young people to inform those able to help for example teachers, nurses, health professionals etc. when a young person becomes aware that another young person is self harming. The shocking self harm to which Aleysha Martine Karla McLoughlin had subjected herself was only revealed when a school friend brought it to the attention of a teacher. There was no evidence that there was any system in place to encourage the passing of such information. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably report self-harm and suicide risks to people able to help.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Omission of blood pressure checks from annual health checks for looked after children

Wider context from the report

“(1) That it should be considered that the system of training for those working with young people, including teachers, school nurses, foster carers, social workers, mental health workers and medical nurses and doctors should be reviewed so as to ensure that these professionals should be alert for signs of self harm and should take opportunities to discover themselves so that those harming themselves can be offered help and support. By way of example evidence was given at the Inquest that the annual health check offered to looked after children did not include a blood pressure check. If a blood pressure check was included this would provide an opportunity for signs of self harm to be revealed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of training for professionals working with young people to support recognition and discovery of self-harm

Wider context from the report

“(1) That it should be considered that the system of training for those working with young people, including teachers, school nurses, foster carers, social workers, mental health workers and medical nurses and doctors should be reviewed so as to ensure that these professionals should be alert for signs of self harm and should take opportunities to discover themselves so that those harming themselves can be offered help and support. By way of example evidence was given at the Inquest that the annual health check offered to looked after children did not include a blood pressure check. If a blood pressure check was included this would provide an opportunity for signs of self harm to be revealed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate frontline training to recognise and respond to suicide and self-harm risk.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Support the Public Service Transformation Network and Early Intervention Foundation in co-designing better outcomes for vulnerable people.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Lastly, DCLG is focussed on supporting local services to provide early, integrated support for people who need the most help. Central to this is a need to ensure effective sharing of information between agencies and developing effective multi-agency approaches. The department supports the Public Service Transformation Network and the Early Intervention Foundation to help councils and their local partners in the co-design and co-production of better outcomes for vulnerable people. DCLG also supports local authorities on the delivery of the expanded troubled families programme. This aims to directly help up to 400,000 families over the next five years, transforming lives by improving the way local services operate, crucially joining up and co-ordinating the support they offer these families.”

Source location

2015-00136-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 4 · response
Published 8 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Support local authorities in delivering the expanded troubled families programme to improve coordinated services for vulnerable families.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Lastly, DCLG is focussed on supporting local services to provide early, integrated support for people who need the most help. Central to this is a need to ensure effective sharing of information between agencies and developing effective multi-agency approaches. The department supports the Public Service Transformation Network and the Early Intervention Foundation to help councils and their local partners in the co-design and co-production of better outcomes for vulnerable people. DCLG also supports local authorities on the delivery of the expanded troubled families programme. This aims to directly help up to 400,000 families over the next five years, transforming lives by improving the way local services operate, crucially joining up and co-ordinating the support they offer these families.”

Source location

2015-00136-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 4 · response
Published 8 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Local Safeguarding Children Boards are responsible for safeguarding children and ensuring local agencies’ effectiveness.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Provision exists under Section 14 of the Children Act 2004 for Local Safeguarding Children Boards (LSCBs) to have responsibility for safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children and ensuring the effectiveness of local agencies in this respect.”

Source location

2015-00136-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 3 · response
Published 8 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Association of Independent LSCB Chairs was asked to consider the concerns raised about local safeguarding arrangements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“DfE has forwarded a copy of your letter to ████████ of the Association of Independent LSCB Chairs asking him to consider the points you raise. DfE has also introduced a number of reforms of social work practice to protect vulnerable people.”

Source location

2015-00136-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 3 · response
Published 8 April 2015

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Make implementation decisions for social work accreditation processes in consultation with the social work sector.

    Stated by Department for Education (DfE) and the Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLGStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 April 2015.
  2. 2

    Develop assessment and accreditation processes for child and family social workers.

    Stated by Department for Education (DfE) and the Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLGStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 8 April 2015.
  3. 3

    Use the social work knowledge and skills statement in university courses and training partnerships.

    Stated by Department for Education (DfE) and the Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLGStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 April 2015.
  4. 4

    Introduce reforms to social work practice to protect vulnerable people.

    Stated by Department for Education (DfE) and the Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLGStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 April 2015.
  5. 5

    Publish the knowledge and skills statement required for child and family social work.

    Stated by Department for Education (DfE) and the Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLGStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 April 2015.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    NHS England is responsible for leading the transformation and commissioning of children’s and young people’s mental health services.

    Stated by Department for Education (DfE) and the Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLGRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Make implementation decisions for social work accreditation processes in consultation with the social work sector.

Verbatim wording from the response

“DfE is developing the assessment and accreditation processes. Decisions about implementation will be made in consultation with the social work sector.”

Source location

2015-00136-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 4 · response
Published 8 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop assessment and accreditation processes for child and family social workers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• for development of an effective and robust assessment and accreditation system for child and family social workers to ensure absolute public confidence in the quality of practice undertaken by social workers.”

Source location

2015-00136-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 3 · response
Published 8 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use the social work knowledge and skills statement in university courses and training partnerships.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In November 2014, DfE published a statement of the knowledge and skills required for child and family social work. This was produced by the Chief Social Worker for Children and Families, shaped by feedback from nearly a thousand social workers. It is the definitive statement of what social workers need to know, and what they should be able to do, to make the right decisions for vulnerable families. The statement will help deliver the highest level of protection and will be used:”

Source location

2015-00136-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 3 · response
Published 8 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce reforms to social work practice to protect vulnerable people.

Verbatim wording from the response

“DfE has forwarded a copy of your letter to ████████ of the Association of Independent LSCB Chairs asking him to consider the points you raise. DfE has also introduced a number of reforms of social work practice to protect vulnerable people.”

Source location

2015-00136-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 3 · response
Published 8 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish the knowledge and skills statement required for child and family social work.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In November 2014, DfE published a statement of the knowledge and skills required for child and family social work. This was produced by the Chief Social Worker for Children and Families, shaped by feedback from nearly a thousand social workers. It is the definitive statement of what social workers need to know, and what they should be able to do, to make the right decisions for vulnerable families. The statement will help deliver the highest level of protection and will be used:”

Source location

2015-00136-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 3 · response
Published 8 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NHS England is responsible for leading the transformation and commissioning of children’s and young people’s mental health services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England is leading a service transformation programme to reshape the way mental health services for children and young people are commissioned and”

Source location

2015-00136-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 2 · response
Published 8 April 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026