PFD report

Kore Elizabeth Padgett · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 28 Aug 2025•West Yorkshire (Western)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Failure to assess the risks and benefits of collar use and support an informed decision
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe cervical-collar provision and management
  2. Lack of staff training in correct fitting of hard collars
  3. Failure of ward care professionals to communicate concerns about the health impact of collar use
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable communication of patient-care information between clinical staffPart of recurring concern: Unsafe cervical-collar provision and management
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Provide competency-based neck-collar application, monitoring and management training to relevant ward clinical staff.

    Stated by Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 3 September 2025.
  2. Action

    Revise clinical guidance and protocols to establish escalation processes for advice, complications and neurosurgical liaison in cervical spine injury care.

    Stated by Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 3 September 2025.
  3. Action

    Implement a cervical-spine pathway directing patients to dedicated acute orthopaedic wards with coordinated orthogeriatric and multidisciplinary support.

    Stated by Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 3 September 2025.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to assess the risks and benefits of collar use and support an informed decision

Wider context from the report

“iii)      The absence of any consideration of the risks versus benefits of wearing the collar and consequently the lack of opportunity for Kore to consider the risk versus benefits and make an informed decision as to how she wanted to proceed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe cervical-collar provision and management.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of staff training in correct fitting of hard collars

Wider context from the report

“i)        The absence of training for staff on the ward in respect of the correct fitting of a hard collar; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of ward care professionals to communicate concerns about the health impact of collar use

Wider context from the report

“iv)      The lack of communication between professionals providing care on the ward and the concerns they were raising as to the impact of the collar upon Kore's health and the absence of any consideration of those concerns by those in charge of Kore’s care with no multi-disciplinary approach as to the available treatment options or further assessments which could have been undertaken. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable communication of patient-care information between clinical staff; Unsafe cervical-collar provision and management.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a multidisciplinary approach to treatment options and further assessments

Wider context from the report

“iv)      The lack of communication between professionals providing care on the ward and the concerns they were raising as to the impact of the collar upon Kore's health and the absence of any consideration of those concerns by those in charge of Kore’s care with no multi-disciplinary approach as to the available treatment options or further assessments which could have been undertaken. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure by those in charge of care to consider concerns about the impact of collar use

Wider context from the report

“iv)      The lack of communication between professionals providing care on the ward and the concerns they were raising as to the impact of the collar upon Kore's health and the absence of any consideration of those concerns by those in charge of Kore’s care with no multi-disciplinary approach as to the available treatment options or further assessments which could have been undertaken. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe cervical-collar provision and management.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of treating clinicians to communicate with the neurosurgical team about treatment options

Wider context from the report

“ii)       The absence of communication by the treating clinicians with the neurosurgical team at Leeds in respect of treatment options for Kore given the significant impact that the wearing of the collar was having on Kore with the development of pressure sores, difficulties with her swallow and increasing risks of aspiration. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable communication of patient-care information between clinical staff.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide competency-based neck-collar application, monitoring and management training to relevant ward clinical staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“orthopaedic wards) to support continuity of care and operational efficiency. To ensure safe and effective treatment, competency-based training will be provided to all clinical professionals involved in their care, including Registered Nurses, Allied Health Professionals, and substantive ward based Medical Staff. Led by ████████ (Senior Clinical Orthotist) and ████████ (Outpatient Therapy Services Manager), the training focuses on validated competency in the application, monitoring, and management of neck collars. Two sessions have been scheduled for Ward 19 staff in December 2025, with further sessions planned for Ward 21 staff in January 2026. Compliance will be monitored through annual audits, beginning one month after training implementation. The initiative remains on track for completion by the end of January 2026.”

Source location

Response from Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 3 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise clinical guidance and protocols to establish escalation processes for advice, complications and neurosurgical liaison in cervical spine injury care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To support this pathway, CHFT guidance and protocols are being revised to provide clear escalation processes for clinical advice, complications and neurosurgical liaison and involvement relating to cervical spine injury. These revisions are being led by Dr ████████, Consultant in Care of the Elderly, and will ensure that patients are managed consistently in line with updated standards. This work is also scheduled for completion by November 2025 and is progressing as planned.”

Source location

Response from Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 3 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a cervical-spine pathway directing patients to dedicated acute orthopaedic wards with coordinated orthogeriatric and multidisciplinary support.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has taken proactive and comprehensive steps to ensure the safe and consistent care of patients with cervical spine injuries. In response to concerns raised, we have developed a robust clinical pathway to guide admission, and treatment within dedicated acute orthopaedic wards. This pathway ensures that patients are consistently placed in clinical areas with the appropriate skills and resources to support all aspects of their care. The pathway also incorporates coordinated support from ortho-geriatricians and the multidisciplinary team (MDT). An ongoing audit is evaluating the admitting ward allocation, treatment, and patient outcomes. This work is led by ████████ Consultant and Divisional Director for Surgery and Anaesthetics, and ████████ Consultant and Clinical Director for Acute Medicine, and is on track for delivery by November 2025.”

Source location

Response from Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 3 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise electronic care plans to document collar-related risk-benefit discussions and informed consent.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, CHFT is further embedding person-centred care principles to support informed consent when a patient has a collar in place. Led by ████████, Associate Director of Nursing for Surgery and Anaesthetics and Matron ████████, care plans are being revised to ensure that discussions around risk and benefit are documented clearly within the Electronic Patient Record (EPR). This initiative will be monitored through EPR audits and Quality Assurance Leadership walk rounds and is scheduled for completion by January 2026.”

Source location

Response from Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 3 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and implement a collar initiation and management procedure covering consent, risk-benefit decisions, neurosurgical input and escalation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for collar initiation and management is also being developed. This SOP will include guidance on consent, risk versus benefit, informed decision-making, collaborative input from the neurosurgical team, and clear escalation protocols. Led by Dr ████████, Matron for Surgery and Anaesthetics, the SOP will be embedded within the competency framework and is scheduled for implementation by the end of January 2026.”

Source location

Response from Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 3 September 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Conduct an ongoing audit of ward allocation, treatment and outcomes for patients with cervical spine injuries.

    Stated by Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 3 September 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct an ongoing audit of ward allocation, treatment and outcomes for patients with cervical spine injuries.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has taken proactive and comprehensive steps to ensure the safe and consistent care of patients with cervical spine injuries. In response to concerns raised, we have developed a robust clinical pathway to guide admission, and treatment within dedicated acute orthopaedic wards. This pathway ensures that patients are consistently placed in clinical areas with the appropriate skills and resources to support all aspects of their care. The pathway also incorporates coordinated support from ortho-geriatricians and the multidisciplinary team (MDT). An ongoing audit is evaluating the admitting ward allocation, treatment, and patient outcomes. This work is led by ████████ Consultant and Divisional Director for Surgery and Anaesthetics, and ████████ Consultant and Clinical Director for Acute Medicine, and is on track for delivery by November 2025.”

Source location

Response from Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 3 September 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026