PFD report

Irene Scholey · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 13 Nov 2015•West Yorkshire (East)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Concerns raised2

  1. Unsafe and inappropriate household environment for an elderly and vulnerable adult
  2. Failure of relevant agencies to access and share information about vulnerable adults’ home environments
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated carePart of recurring concern: Unreliable interagency sharing of safeguarding risk information
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unsafe and inappropriate household environment for an elderly and vulnerable adult

Wider context from the report

“(3) The household was dysfunctional, was an inappropriate environment for Irene Scholey to be living in, and was a risk to her physical and emotional wellbeing. (4) A safeguarding alert was raised in respect of Mrs Scholey in April/May 2012. (5) Her wellbeing would have been safeguarded had all relevant agencies been able to access, and to share, information relating to the home environment in which Mrs Scholey was living. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of relevant agencies to access and share information about vulnerable adults’ home environments

Wider context from the report

“(3) The household was dysfunctional, was an inappropriate environment for Irene Scholey to be living in, and was a risk to her physical and emotional wellbeing. (4) A safeguarding alert was raised in respect of Mrs Scholey in April/May 2012. (5) Her wellbeing would have been safeguarded had all relevant agencies been able to access, and to share, information relating to the home environment in which Mrs Scholey was living. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated care; Unreliable interagency sharing of safeguarding risk information.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026