PFD report

Gladys Margaret Borgogno · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 31 Jul 2019•Stoke-on-Trent and North Staffordshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Inadequate pre- and post-procedure written documentation of advice to seek further medical attention after vomiting
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety-netting advice for patients and carers
  2. Insufficient length of post-procedure observation after vomiting
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Strengthen post-ERCP discharge information to emphasise returning to hospital if vomiting or other symptoms develop at home, subject to governance ratification.

    Stated by University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 18 October 2019.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    A single vomiting episode without other symptoms does not warrant automatically extending post-ERCP observation; clinical concerns determine further monitoring or overnight observation.

    Stated by University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate pre- and post-procedure written documentation of advice to seek further medical attention after vomiting

Wider context from the report

“(2) The pre and post procedure written documentation in respect of the advice to seek further medical attention if vomiting developed post procedure upon discharge from hospital. In evidence at inquest, the treating Consultant Pancreatico-biliary Surgeon advised that he understood the family’s confusion surrounding the symptom of vomiting given the fact that Mrs Borgogno had vomited after the procedure but had been discharged from hospital. He advised that he would recommend that the hospital review its pre and post procedure ERCP documentation provided to patients. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety-netting advice for patients and carers.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient length of post-procedure observation after vomiting

Wider context from the report

“(1) The length of the post procedure observation period where there has been an episode of vomiting in the absence of any other symptoms and normal observations. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Strengthen post-ERCP discharge information to emphasise returning to hospital if vomiting or other symptoms develop at home, subject to governance ratification.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. The Trust has strengthened the information given to patients on discharge following ERCP. I have attached the draft document for you with the amended information in red. This is currently being ratified through the Trust’s governance processes but it now highlights the importance of returning to hospital if vomiting, and other symptoms, start at home. This is to cover those uncommon situations where symptoms develop post 4 hours following the ERCP procedure.”

Source location

2019-0286-Response-by-University-Hospitals-of-North-Midlands
Page 2 · response
Published 18 October 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A single vomiting episode without other symptoms does not warrant automatically extending post-ERCP observation; clinical concerns determine further monitoring or overnight observation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Post ERCP, all the patients have observations every 10 minutes for the first hour, and then every 15 minutes, 30 minutes or every hour until the time of discharge (4 hours after the procedure), depending on the patients clinical condition.”

Source location

2019-0286-Response-by-University-Hospitals-of-North-Midlands
Page 2 · response
Published 18 October 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026