PFD report

Jacques Gerard Lakeman and Torin Callan Lakeman · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 15 May 2015•Manchester West

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Lack of protection for Internet-based drug delivery and importation through the UK postal system
  2. Lack of regulation of Internet-based drug supply
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safeguards for access to dangerous drugs
  3. Unknown and potentially contaminated composition of Internet-supplied drugs
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable information about the contents of illicit drugs
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Continue operations targeting online marketplaces trading controlled drugs and other illegal commodities.

    Stated by Home OfficeStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 15 May 2015.
  2. Action

    Continue enhancing border security and coordinating enforcement against serious, organised and complex crime.

    Stated by Home OfficeStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 15 May 2015.
  3. Action

    Remove technical infrastructure hosting illegal dark-web marketplaces.

    Stated by Home OfficeStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 15 May 2015.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of protection for Internet-based drug delivery and importation through the UK postal system

Wider context from the report

“1. During the Inquest evidence was heard that: i. Torin had received supplies of drugs, prior to November 2014, by use of the Internet using the “Dark Internet” or “Dark Web”. The Inquest heard that access to the “Dark Internet” or “Dark Web” would be difficult without having knowledge or expertise in relation to Internet access but young persons, particular intelligent University students, would find access to the websites to be relatively easy and it would not be difficult for such persons to obtain access to illicit activities, including the supply of illicit drugs. The websites are anonymous and there is no contact information with regard to the address or location of the owners of the website nor with regard to the suppliers of illicit drugs. ii. The constituent parts of the drugs, including the strength and content of the drugs, are unknown and may contain contaminants and further illicit substances creating an additional risk. iii. There is no regulation of the supply of drugs by use of the Internet and there is no protection in place in relation to the delivery or importation of drugs using the Internet and delivery to a United Kingdom postal address by use of the Postal System. iv. The evidence raised concerns that future deaths will occur unless action is taken to review the above issues, particularly in view of the supply of illicit drugs, including Class A drugs, by use of the Internet. v. On the 30th March 2015 I reported a similar concern to you relating to the death of Jason Houghton, who died on the 30th June 2014 from the combined toxic effects of illicit drugs obtained by use of the Internet. 2. I request that you consider the above concerns particularly in regard to the following:- i. The supply and importation of drugs, including Class A drugs, in the manner and in the form described in this report, by use of the Internet. ii. The regulation of the Internet, which may be difficult if not impossible, in relation to the supply of drugs and delivery of drugs to addresses in the United Kingdom by use of the Postal System. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of regulation of Internet-based drug supply

Wider context from the report

“1. During the Inquest evidence was heard that: i. Torin had received supplies of drugs, prior to November 2014, by use of the Internet using the “Dark Internet” or “Dark Web”. The Inquest heard that access to the “Dark Internet” or “Dark Web” would be difficult without having knowledge or expertise in relation to Internet access but young persons, particular intelligent University students, would find access to the websites to be relatively easy and it would not be difficult for such persons to obtain access to illicit activities, including the supply of illicit drugs. The websites are anonymous and there is no contact information with regard to the address or location of the owners of the website nor with regard to the suppliers of illicit drugs. ii. The constituent parts of the drugs, including the strength and content of the drugs, are unknown and may contain contaminants and further illicit substances creating an additional risk. iii. There is no regulation of the supply of drugs by use of the Internet and there is no protection in place in relation to the delivery or importation of drugs using the Internet and delivery to a United Kingdom postal address by use of the Postal System. iv. The evidence raised concerns that future deaths will occur unless action is taken to review the above issues, particularly in view of the supply of illicit drugs, including Class A drugs, by use of the Internet. v. On the 30th March 2015 I reported a similar concern to you relating to the death of Jason Houghton, who died on the 30th June 2014 from the combined toxic effects of illicit drugs obtained by use of the Internet. 2. I request that you consider the above concerns particularly in regard to the following:- i. The supply and importation of drugs, including Class A drugs, in the manner and in the form described in this report, by use of the Internet. ii. The regulation of the Internet, which may be difficult if not impossible, in relation to the supply of drugs and delivery of drugs to addresses in the United Kingdom by use of the Postal System. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safeguards for access to dangerous drugs.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unknown and potentially contaminated composition of Internet-supplied drugs

Wider context from the report

“1. During the Inquest evidence was heard that: i. Torin had received supplies of drugs, prior to November 2014, by use of the Internet using the “Dark Internet” or “Dark Web”. The Inquest heard that access to the “Dark Internet” or “Dark Web” would be difficult without having knowledge or expertise in relation to Internet access but young persons, particular intelligent University students, would find access to the websites to be relatively easy and it would not be difficult for such persons to obtain access to illicit activities, including the supply of illicit drugs. The websites are anonymous and there is no contact information with regard to the address or location of the owners of the website nor with regard to the suppliers of illicit drugs. ii. The constituent parts of the drugs, including the strength and content of the drugs, are unknown and may contain contaminants and further illicit substances creating an additional risk. iii. There is no regulation of the supply of drugs by use of the Internet and there is no protection in place in relation to the delivery or importation of drugs using the Internet and delivery to a United Kingdom postal address by use of the Postal System. iv. The evidence raised concerns that future deaths will occur unless action is taken to review the above issues, particularly in view of the supply of illicit drugs, including Class A drugs, by use of the Internet. v. On the 30th March 2015 I reported a similar concern to you relating to the death of Jason Houghton, who died on the 30th June 2014 from the combined toxic effects of illicit drugs obtained by use of the Internet. 2. I request that you consider the above concerns particularly in regard to the following:- i. The supply and importation of drugs, including Class A drugs, in the manner and in the form described in this report, by use of the Internet. ii. The regulation of the Internet, which may be difficult if not impossible, in relation to the supply of drugs and delivery of drugs to addresses in the United Kingdom by use of the Postal System. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable information about the contents of illicit drugs.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ease of access to illicit drug supply through Internet websites

Wider context from the report

“1. During the Inquest evidence was heard that: i. Torin had received supplies of drugs, prior to November 2014, by use of the Internet using the “Dark Internet” or “Dark Web”. The Inquest heard that access to the “Dark Internet” or “Dark Web” would be difficult without having knowledge or expertise in relation to Internet access but young persons, particular intelligent University students, would find access to the websites to be relatively easy and it would not be difficult for such persons to obtain access to illicit activities, including the supply of illicit drugs. The websites are anonymous and there is no contact information with regard to the address or location of the owners of the website nor with regard to the suppliers of illicit drugs. ii. The constituent parts of the drugs, including the strength and content of the drugs, are unknown and may contain contaminants and further illicit substances creating an additional risk. iii. There is no regulation of the supply of drugs by use of the Internet and there is no protection in place in relation to the delivery or importation of drugs using the Internet and delivery to a United Kingdom postal address by use of the Postal System. iv. The evidence raised concerns that future deaths will occur unless action is taken to review the above issues, particularly in view of the supply of illicit drugs, including Class A drugs, by use of the Internet. v. On the 30th March 2015 I reported a similar concern to you relating to the death of Jason Houghton, who died on the 30th June 2014 from the combined toxic effects of illicit drugs obtained by use of the Internet. 2. I request that you consider the above concerns particularly in regard to the following:- i. The supply and importation of drugs, including Class A drugs, in the manner and in the form described in this report, by use of the Internet. ii. The regulation of the Internet, which may be difficult if not impossible, in relation to the supply of drugs and delivery of drugs to addresses in the United Kingdom by use of the Postal System. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safeguards for access to dangerous drugs.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of traceability of Internet-based illicit drug suppliers

Wider context from the report

“1. During the Inquest evidence was heard that: i. Torin had received supplies of drugs, prior to November 2014, by use of the Internet using the “Dark Internet” or “Dark Web”. The Inquest heard that access to the “Dark Internet” or “Dark Web” would be difficult without having knowledge or expertise in relation to Internet access but young persons, particular intelligent University students, would find access to the websites to be relatively easy and it would not be difficult for such persons to obtain access to illicit activities, including the supply of illicit drugs. The websites are anonymous and there is no contact information with regard to the address or location of the owners of the website nor with regard to the suppliers of illicit drugs. ii. The constituent parts of the drugs, including the strength and content of the drugs, are unknown and may contain contaminants and further illicit substances creating an additional risk. iii. There is no regulation of the supply of drugs by use of the Internet and there is no protection in place in relation to the delivery or importation of drugs using the Internet and delivery to a United Kingdom postal address by use of the Postal System. iv. The evidence raised concerns that future deaths will occur unless action is taken to review the above issues, particularly in view of the supply of illicit drugs, including Class A drugs, by use of the Internet. v. On the 30th March 2015 I reported a similar concern to you relating to the death of Jason Houghton, who died on the 30th June 2014 from the combined toxic effects of illicit drugs obtained by use of the Internet. 2. I request that you consider the above concerns particularly in regard to the following:- i. The supply and importation of drugs, including Class A drugs, in the manner and in the form described in this report, by use of the Internet. ii. The regulation of the Internet, which may be difficult if not impossible, in relation to the supply of drugs and delivery of drugs to addresses in the United Kingdom by use of the Postal System. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue operations targeting online marketplaces trading controlled drugs and other illegal commodities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Simultaneously, partners from the European Cybercrime Centre, acting on intelligence developed by US counterparts, took out technical infrastructure which was key to the hosting of illegal market places on the dark web, in total over 400 hidden services taken down. The action was part of continuing operations to target the use of online market places to trade in illegal commodities such as class A drugs, firearms and false documents.”

Source location

2015-0191-Response-by-Home-Office
Page 2 · response
Published 15 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue enhancing border security and coordinating enforcement against serious, organised and complex crime.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, as I stated in my previous letter to you, Border Force officers are on constant alert to keep controlled drugs from entering the country. The associated enforcement response includes intelligence-led examination of packages and letters sent by post to intercept the importation of controlled substances. Working together with law enforcement partners, this activity is co-ordinated by the NCA who are continuing to enhance the security of our borders and lead the fight against serious, organised and complex crime.”

Source location

2015-0191-Response-by-Home-Office
Page 2 · response
Published 15 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remove technical infrastructure hosting illegal dark-web marketplaces.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Simultaneously, partners from the European Cybercrime Centre, acting on intelligence developed by US counterparts, took out technical infrastructure which was key to the hosting of illegal market places on the dark web, in total over 400 hidden services taken down. The action was part of continuing operations to target the use of online market places to trade in illegal commodities such as class A drugs, firearms and false documents.”

Source location

2015-0191-Response-by-Home-Office
Page 2 · response
Published 15 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor online controlled-drug offers and act with industry partners to close websites trading illegally.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The National Crime Agency (NCA) and the police routinely monitor controlled drugs being offered for sale on the internet and take action with industry partners to close websites trading illegally in these substances. Where it has been identified, or where there is reasonable suspicion to suggest, that controlled drugs are being sold on websites, law enforcement agencies have the relevant powers under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 to act against suppliers of controlled drugs, whether on controlled drug charges or on suspicion of wider drug-related offences.”

Source location

2015-0191-Response-by-Home-Office
Page 2 · response
Published 15 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Arrest suspected administrators and vendors involved in online drug marketplaces and illegal drug supply.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In November 2014, the NCA, working with police forces across the UK, arrested six people in strikes coordinated with international partners. Those arrested included suspected administrators for the online market place Silk Road 2.0 and another online drug market place, as well as significant vendors of illegal drugs through the dark web.”

Source location

2015-0191-Response-by-Home-Office
Page 2 · response
Published 15 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Examine packages and letters through intelligence-led enforcement to intercept controlled-drug imports.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, as I stated in my previous letter to you, Border Force officers are on constant alert to keep controlled drugs from entering the country. The associated enforcement response includes intelligence-led examination of packages and letters sent by post to intercept the importation of controlled substances. Working together with law enforcement partners, this activity is co-ordinated by the NCA who are continuing to enhance the security of our borders and lead the fight against serious, organised and complex crime.”

Source location

2015-0191-Response-by-Home-Office
Page 2 · response
Published 15 May 2015

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Online purchasing is a small overall element of drug supply, with only 1% of recent adult drug users sourcing drugs from the internet.

    Stated by Home OfficeDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Online purchasing is a small overall element of drug supply, with only 1% of recent adult drug users sourcing drugs from the internet.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As I stated in my recent letter to you regarding the death of Jason Houghton, online purchasing remains a small overall element of drug supply. The 2013/14 Crime Survey for England and Wales shows that just 1% of adults who used drugs in the last 12 months sourced them from the internet.”

Source location

2015-0191-Response-by-Home-Office
Page 1 · response
Published 15 May 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026