PFD report

Freda Mary Lennox · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 10 May 2022•Surrey

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Failure to inform the consultant anaesthetist about patients and their medical co-morbidities before admission
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably notify responsible consultants about admissions and significant clinical changes
  2. Unavailability of designated permanent room space for a high-risk anaesthetic pre-operative assessment clinic
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable pre-operative assessment arrangements delaying or compromising surgery
  3. Lack of funding for a dedicated high-risk consultant-led anaesthetic pre-operative assessment clinic with necessary equipment
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Establish four protected consultant-led high-risk anaesthetic pre-assessment clinics weekly, including specialist orthopaedic expertise, dedicated rooms and appropriate medical equipment.

    Stated by Ashford and St Peter'S Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 May 2022.
  2. Action

    Create a dedicated electronic referral pathway for high-risk clinics and formalise patient risk assessments visible to relevant pre-operative staff.

    Stated by Ashford and St Peter'S Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 May 2022.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to inform the consultant anaesthetist about patients and their medical co-morbidities before admission

Wider context from the report

“3. The consultant anaesthetist was not informed about Mrs Lennox and her medical co-morbidities prior to her admission. Nonetheless the consultant anaesthetist undertook a thorough pre-operative assessment on the day of surgery and Mrs Lennox consented for surgery. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably notify responsible consultants about admissions and significant clinical changes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of designated permanent room space for a high-risk anaesthetic pre-operative assessment clinic

Wider context from the report

“5. There was no designated (permanent) room space to set up such a clinic and no secretarial input to type reports for high-risk patients which led to a significant delay in providing a timely service. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable pre-operative assessment arrangements delaying or compromising surgery.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of funding for a dedicated high-risk consultant-led anaesthetic pre-operative assessment clinic with necessary equipment

Wider context from the report

“4. Evidence was heard that there was a lack of funding for a dedicated high-risk consultant led anaesthetic pre-operative assessment clinic with the necessary equipment to be able to suitably risk assess patients prior to any potential surgery. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of secretarial input to type reports for high-risk patients

Wider context from the report

“5. There was no designated (permanent) room space to set up such a clinic and no secretarial input to type reports for high-risk patients which led to a significant delay in providing a timely service. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to complete requested pre-operative echocardiographic assessment for pulmonary hypertension or Cor Pulmonale

Wider context from the report

“1. Mrs Lennox had previous pre-operative assessments in 2018 and 2019 and a respiratory review in February 2020. Following a telephone consultation in September 2020 an echocardiogram was requested to look for pulmonary hypertension and/or the development of Cor Pulmonale but this had not been carried out prior to her surgery. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate preoperative assessment of surgical suitability and risk.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide recent consultant orthopaedic review before admission for elective surgery

Wider context from the report

“2. Mrs Lennox had not been recently reviewed by the consultant orthopaedic surgeon prior to her admission on 2nd November 2020 despite her medical co-morbidities having given rise to concerns as to her suitability for an elective total hip replacement. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Delays in consultant review of patients.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish four protected consultant-led high-risk anaesthetic pre-assessment clinics weekly, including specialist orthopaedic expertise, dedicated rooms and appropriate medical equipment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has appointed an anaesthetic lead for high-risk anaesthetic patient pathways, and in response to your concerns we have finalised our plans to expand the services for high-risk patients.”

Source location

Response from St Peter's Hospital
Page 1 · response
Published 12 May 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Create a dedicated electronic referral pathway for high-risk clinics and formalise patient risk assessments visible to relevant pre-operative staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust introduced an electronic patient record system in 2022, called Surrey Safe Care (SCC). We have created a specific SSC pathway for referral into the high-risk clinic that sits separately to the standard pre-operative assessment referral pathway. This requires a referral by a consultant surgeon. The SCC system also allows for a range of formalised patient risk assessments and recognised scoring systems individualised to the patient as appropriate. These risk assessments are visible to all relevant staff with the aim of adequately informing anaesthetists and others, pre-operatively about their patient’s risk status.”

Source location

Response from St Peter's Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 12 May 2022

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Appoint an anaesthetic lead for high-risk anaesthetic patient pathways.

    Stated by Ashford and St Peter'S Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 May 2022.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Appoint an anaesthetic lead for high-risk anaesthetic patient pathways.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has appointed an anaesthetic lead for high-risk anaesthetic patient pathways, and in response to your concerns we have finalised our plans to expand the services for high-risk patients.”

Source location

Response from St Peter's Hospital
Page 1 · response
Published 12 May 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026