PFD report

Paul Fairey · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 21 Dec 2018•Inner South London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Deterioration of speed-cushion surface
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to maintain roads, pavements and verges in a safe state of repair
  2. Obstruction of street-lamp lighting by tree foliage
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate and unreliable public-road street lightingPart of recurring concern: Inadequate control of pedestrian crossing risksPart of recurring concern: Inadequate outdoor safety lighting
  3. Speed cushion failing to require vehicles to slow down
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of pedestrian crossing risksPart of recurring concern: Inadequate speed control at hazardous road locations
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Arrange cutting back privately owned tree foliage to the highway boundary near the collision site.

    Stated by London Borough of LewishamStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 21 December 2018.
  2. Action

    Remark the northbound and southbound “SLOW” road markings approaching the pedestrian crossing.

    Stated by London Borough of LewishamStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 December 2018.
  3. Action

    Reconstruct speed cushions near the two pedestrian refuge crossing points adjacent to Mayow Park.

    Stated by London Borough of LewishamStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 December 2018.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Financial constraints mean widespread renewal of worn traffic-calming features is not feasible; only cushions near the crossings will be reconstructed.

    Stated by London Borough of LewishamUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deterioration of speed-cushion surface

Wider context from the report

“(3) There is a speed cushion close to the pedestrian crossing point. The evidence was that a car can straddle this speed cushion without needing to slow down. Also the speed cushion is beginning to break up. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to maintain roads, pavements and verges in a safe state of repair.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Obstruction of street-lamp lighting by tree foliage

Wider context from the report

“(1) The street lamp nearest to the collision site (8m south of De Frene Rd, on the east side of Mayow Rd) was shrouded by tree foliage causing a large shadow across Mayow Rd. This shadow encompassed the site of the collision and the nearby pedestrian crossing point. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate and unreliable public-road street lighting; Inadequate control of pedestrian crossing risks; Inadequate outdoor safety lighting.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Speed cushion failing to require vehicles to slow down

Wider context from the report

“(3) There is a speed cushion close to the pedestrian crossing point. The evidence was that a car can straddle this speed cushion without needing to slow down. Also the speed cushion is beginning to break up. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of pedestrian crossing risks; Inadequate speed control at hazardous road locations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of painted SLOW road marking to remain clearly visible to motorists

Wider context from the report

“(2) There is a painted “SLOW” on the north bound lane near to the collision site. The evidence was that this sign has faded and may not be clearly visible to a motorist. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road markings for road-user safety.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Arrange cutting back privately owned tree foliage to the highway boundary near the collision site.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Response - The trees under consideration are privately owned. Letters were sent to the adjacent property owners in May 2018 requiring that they cut back the tree foliage to the highway boundary. As no action has been taken the Council is arranging for the foliage to be cut back. The work is expected to be completed by the end of February 2019.”

Source location

Response from Lewisham
Page 1 · response
Published 21 December 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remark the northbound and southbound “SLOW” road markings approaching the pedestrian crossing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Response - The northbound "SLOW" marking approaching the crossing point was remarked in December 2017. The southbound slow marking approaching the crossing point was also remarked.”

Source location

Response from Lewisham
Page 1 · response
Published 21 December 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reconstruct speed cushions near the two pedestrian refuge crossing points adjacent to Mayow Park.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Response - The speed cushions in Mayow Road have been in place for a number of years and may be less effective due to long term wear. Financial constraints generally mean that widespread renewal of worn traffic calming features is not feasible. However it is proposed to reconstruct the speed cushions in close proximity of the two pedestrian refuge crossing points adjacent to Mayow Park to ensure that they are as effective as possible. This work is programmed to be completed by the end of April 2019.”

Source location

Response from Lewisham
Page 1 · response
Published 21 December 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Financial constraints mean widespread renewal of worn traffic-calming features is not feasible; only cushions near the crossings will be reconstructed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Response - The speed cushions in Mayow Road have been in place for a number of years and may be less effective due to long term wear. Financial constraints generally mean that widespread renewal of worn traffic calming features is not feasible. However it is proposed to reconstruct the speed cushions in close proximity of the two pedestrian refuge crossing points adjacent to Mayow Park to ensure that they are as effective as possible. This work is programmed to be completed by the end of April 2019.”

Source location

Response from Lewisham
Page 1 · response
Published 21 December 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026