PFD report

Catherine Sarah Forbes · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 14 Nov 2024•Oxfordshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Insufficiently designed or available marina escape ladders
  2. Lack of accessible flotation devices or water-surface platforms for marina self-rescue
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate controls for drowning risks at open-water locations
  3. Lack of reliable alarm systems activatable from the water
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of emergency alarm responsePart of recurring concern: Inadequate controls for drowning risks at open-water locations
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Revise and update the Code of Practice using information about the drowning, including consideration of water-level devices and alarm methods.

    Stated by The Yacht Harbour Association (TYHAStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 19 November 2024.
  2. Action

    Email UK marina members to reinforce robust safety-ladder provision and cross-reference the TYHA Code of Practice.

    Stated by The Yacht Harbour Association (TYHAStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 November 2024.
  3. Action

    Review Gold Anchor criteria using information about the drowning and consider its implications for accredited marinas.

    Stated by The Yacht Harbour Association (TYHAStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 November 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Prescriptive marina regulation is not considered appropriate or practical because circumstances differ between individual marinas.

    Stated by The Yacht Harbour Association (TYHAUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficiently designed or available marina escape ladders

Wider context from the report

“I am mindful that safety improvements have been made at the Thames and Kennet Marina, specifically in relation to risk assessment and ladders having been upgraded to 2m in length with a minimum of 1m beneath the water. This is welcomed, not least because Catherine Forbes was the third person to drown in similar circumstances at the marina since 2016. I have continuing industry wide concerns which, I believe, your organisation is in a position to take account of and review. I note from your response dated 28 May 2024 that British Marine and YHA are keen to ensure that marinas are as safe as possible. The particular concern is in relation to persons falling into the marina, on their own and unwitnessed, and what measures are in place to enable them to get out or raise the alarm. Perhaps the main issue relates to sufficiently designed ladders, in terms of length and grip, but also their number, placement and visibility from the water at day or night (flags, fluorescent signage, lighting for example). It is not for me to make recommendations and I am not an expert of course on marina safety but it is my duty to raise concerns that reflect the evidence heard at inquest and the issues helpfully raised by Ms Forbes family. With this in mind, I enquire if there are flotation devices or small platforms which sit on the surface of the water which a person could access more easily? I also enquire if there are alarm systems that exist or could be considered which can be activated from the water. I appreciate of course they would need to be non-electrical or non-battery or fully waterproof. Further, with regard to the Gold Anchor Award, it appears that the important issue of safety is not one of the key attributes or evaluation categories. Thames and Kennet held the top 5 Gold Anchors at the time of Ms Forbes death but were not fully compliant with the TYHA 2013 Code of Practice in relation to the length of all ladders. I note the 2013 Code is being reviewed from June 2024 and I enquire if the concerns raised in this report can be taken into account, in conjunction with designers and suppliers who the TYHA consult with. I can advise that I will be supplying a copy of this report to the HSE and also the organisation with oversight of District Council’s who often have responsibility for health and safety enforcement of marinas instead of the HSE. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of accessible flotation devices or water-surface platforms for marina self-rescue

Wider context from the report

“I am mindful that safety improvements have been made at the Thames and Kennet Marina, specifically in relation to risk assessment and ladders having been upgraded to 2m in length with a minimum of 1m beneath the water. This is welcomed, not least because Catherine Forbes was the third person to drown in similar circumstances at the marina since 2016. I have continuing industry wide concerns which, I believe, your organisation is in a position to take account of and review. I note from your response dated 28 May 2024 that British Marine and YHA are keen to ensure that marinas are as safe as possible. The particular concern is in relation to persons falling into the marina, on their own and unwitnessed, and what measures are in place to enable them to get out or raise the alarm. Perhaps the main issue relates to sufficiently designed ladders, in terms of length and grip, but also their number, placement and visibility from the water at day or night (flags, fluorescent signage, lighting for example). It is not for me to make recommendations and I am not an expert of course on marina safety but it is my duty to raise concerns that reflect the evidence heard at inquest and the issues helpfully raised by Ms Forbes family. With this in mind, I enquire if there are flotation devices or small platforms which sit on the surface of the water which a person could access more easily? I also enquire if there are alarm systems that exist or could be considered which can be activated from the water. I appreciate of course they would need to be non-electrical or non-battery or fully waterproof. Further, with regard to the Gold Anchor Award, it appears that the important issue of safety is not one of the key attributes or evaluation categories. Thames and Kennet held the top 5 Gold Anchors at the time of Ms Forbes death but were not fully compliant with the TYHA 2013 Code of Practice in relation to the length of all ladders. I note the 2013 Code is being reviewed from June 2024 and I enquire if the concerns raised in this report can be taken into account, in conjunction with designers and suppliers who the TYHA consult with. I can advise that I will be supplying a copy of this report to the HSE and also the organisation with oversight of District Council’s who often have responsibility for health and safety enforcement of marinas instead of the HSE. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate controls for drowning risks at open-water locations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of reliable alarm systems activatable from the water

Wider context from the report

“I am mindful that safety improvements have been made at the Thames and Kennet Marina, specifically in relation to risk assessment and ladders having been upgraded to 2m in length with a minimum of 1m beneath the water. This is welcomed, not least because Catherine Forbes was the third person to drown in similar circumstances at the marina since 2016. I have continuing industry wide concerns which, I believe, your organisation is in a position to take account of and review. I note from your response dated 28 May 2024 that British Marine and YHA are keen to ensure that marinas are as safe as possible. The particular concern is in relation to persons falling into the marina, on their own and unwitnessed, and what measures are in place to enable them to get out or raise the alarm. Perhaps the main issue relates to sufficiently designed ladders, in terms of length and grip, but also their number, placement and visibility from the water at day or night (flags, fluorescent signage, lighting for example). It is not for me to make recommendations and I am not an expert of course on marina safety but it is my duty to raise concerns that reflect the evidence heard at inquest and the issues helpfully raised by Ms Forbes family. With this in mind, I enquire if there are flotation devices or small platforms which sit on the surface of the water which a person could access more easily? I also enquire if there are alarm systems that exist or could be considered which can be activated from the water. I appreciate of course they would need to be non-electrical or non-battery or fully waterproof. Further, with regard to the Gold Anchor Award, it appears that the important issue of safety is not one of the key attributes or evaluation categories. Thames and Kennet held the top 5 Gold Anchors at the time of Ms Forbes death but were not fully compliant with the TYHA 2013 Code of Practice in relation to the length of all ladders. I note the 2013 Code is being reviewed from June 2024 and I enquire if the concerns raised in this report can be taken into account, in conjunction with designers and suppliers who the TYHA consult with. I can advise that I will be supplying a copy of this report to the HSE and also the organisation with oversight of District Council’s who often have responsibility for health and safety enforcement of marinas instead of the HSE. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of emergency alarm response; Inadequate controls for drowning risks at open-water locations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Exclusion of safety from Gold Anchor Award evaluation categories

Wider context from the report

“I am mindful that safety improvements have been made at the Thames and Kennet Marina, specifically in relation to risk assessment and ladders having been upgraded to 2m in length with a minimum of 1m beneath the water. This is welcomed, not least because Catherine Forbes was the third person to drown in similar circumstances at the marina since 2016. I have continuing industry wide concerns which, I believe, your organisation is in a position to take account of and review. I note from your response dated 28 May 2024 that British Marine and YHA are keen to ensure that marinas are as safe as possible. The particular concern is in relation to persons falling into the marina, on their own and unwitnessed, and what measures are in place to enable them to get out or raise the alarm. Perhaps the main issue relates to sufficiently designed ladders, in terms of length and grip, but also their number, placement and visibility from the water at day or night (flags, fluorescent signage, lighting for example). It is not for me to make recommendations and I am not an expert of course on marina safety but it is my duty to raise concerns that reflect the evidence heard at inquest and the issues helpfully raised by Ms Forbes family. With this in mind, I enquire if there are flotation devices or small platforms which sit on the surface of the water which a person could access more easily? I also enquire if there are alarm systems that exist or could be considered which can be activated from the water. I appreciate of course they would need to be non-electrical or non-battery or fully waterproof. Further, with regard to the Gold Anchor Award, it appears that the important issue of safety is not one of the key attributes or evaluation categories. Thames and Kennet held the top 5 Gold Anchors at the time of Ms Forbes death but were not fully compliant with the TYHA 2013 Code of Practice in relation to the length of all ladders. I note the 2013 Code is being reviewed from June 2024 and I enquire if the concerns raised in this report can be taken into account, in conjunction with designers and suppliers who the TYHA consult with. I can advise that I will be supplying a copy of this report to the HSE and also the organisation with oversight of District Council’s who often have responsibility for health and safety enforcement of marinas instead of the HSE. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient visibility of marina escape ladders from the water

Wider context from the report

“I am mindful that safety improvements have been made at the Thames and Kennet Marina, specifically in relation to risk assessment and ladders having been upgraded to 2m in length with a minimum of 1m beneath the water. This is welcomed, not least because Catherine Forbes was the third person to drown in similar circumstances at the marina since 2016. I have continuing industry wide concerns which, I believe, your organisation is in a position to take account of and review. I note from your response dated 28 May 2024 that British Marine and YHA are keen to ensure that marinas are as safe as possible. The particular concern is in relation to persons falling into the marina, on their own and unwitnessed, and what measures are in place to enable them to get out or raise the alarm. Perhaps the main issue relates to sufficiently designed ladders, in terms of length and grip, but also their number, placement and visibility from the water at day or night (flags, fluorescent signage, lighting for example). It is not for me to make recommendations and I am not an expert of course on marina safety but it is my duty to raise concerns that reflect the evidence heard at inquest and the issues helpfully raised by Ms Forbes family. With this in mind, I enquire if there are flotation devices or small platforms which sit on the surface of the water which a person could access more easily? I also enquire if there are alarm systems that exist or could be considered which can be activated from the water. I appreciate of course they would need to be non-electrical or non-battery or fully waterproof. Further, with regard to the Gold Anchor Award, it appears that the important issue of safety is not one of the key attributes or evaluation categories. Thames and Kennet held the top 5 Gold Anchors at the time of Ms Forbes death but were not fully compliant with the TYHA 2013 Code of Practice in relation to the length of all ladders. I note the 2013 Code is being reviewed from June 2024 and I enquire if the concerns raised in this report can be taken into account, in conjunction with designers and suppliers who the TYHA consult with. I can advise that I will be supplying a copy of this report to the HSE and also the organisation with oversight of District Council’s who often have responsibility for health and safety enforcement of marinas instead of the HSE. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise and update the Code of Practice using information about the drowning, including consideration of water-level devices and alarm methods.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Through these objectives and the following actions, TYHA aims to further enhance water safety standards across marinas and reduce the likelihood of similar tragedies in the future. The Code of Practice revision will consider the viability of water level devices to assist with self-rescue and methods of raising the alarm from the water.”

Source location

The Yacht Harbour Association
Page 1 · response
Published 19 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Email UK marina members to reinforce robust safety-ladder provision and cross-reference the TYHA Code of Practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Action | Detail | Who | Reach | Date Email UK marina members (completed) | Email sent to all UK TYHA members (marinas) reminding them to ensure their safety ladder provision is robust and cross referencing to the TYHA COP V7 | TYHA Office | TYHA UK members (554) | 29th November 2024 Brief Gold Anchor assessors (completed) | Initial online briefing delivered to Gold Anchor assessors on the coroner and police reports regarding the tragic death of Catherine Forbes and the associated findings. | ████████ | Assessor team (5) | 5th December 2024 Train Gold Anchor assessors | Annual assessor training to include a session on refining TYHA’s 5 water safety objectives and how these are applied to Gold Anchor assessments.”

Source location

The Yacht Harbour Association
Page 2 · response
Published 19 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review Gold Anchor criteria using information about the drowning and consider its implications for accredited marinas.

Verbatim wording from the response

“100) | May 8th 2025 Fore & Aft Magazine | Member briefing article on TYHA Marina Conference session on water safety | TYHA Office | TYHA members (655) plus halo readers and website visitors | June 2025 Gold Anchor Criteria Review | All information relating to the tragic drowning of Ms Forbes will be considered in the 2024/5 revision of the Gold Anchor criteria | TYHA & Marina Industries Association | TYHA and MIA accredited marinas (213) | Q1 to Q3 2025 Code of Practice (COP) review | All information relating to the tragic drowning of Ms Forbes has been provided to the COP revision team who will use this to revise and update this industry guidance which is used in the UK and internationally | TYHA & Marina Projects | TYHA members (655) | In progress Launch revised Code of Practice | Launch to be conducted at the ICOMIA World Marina Conference 2025 | TYHA & Marina Projects | Circa 500”

Source location

The Yacht Harbour Association
Page 2 · response
Published 19 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Train Gold Anchor assessors on the five water-safety objectives and their application during Gold Anchor assessments.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Action | Detail | Who | Reach | Date Email UK marina members (completed) | Email sent to all UK TYHA members (marinas) reminding them to ensure their safety ladder provision is robust and cross referencing to the TYHA COP V7 | TYHA Office | TYHA UK members (554) | 29th November 2024 Brief Gold Anchor assessors (completed) | Initial online briefing delivered to Gold Anchor assessors on the coroner and police reports regarding the tragic death of Catherine Forbes and the associated findings. | ████████ | Assessor team (5) | 5th December 2024 Train Gold Anchor assessors | Annual assessor training to include a session on refining TYHA’s 5 water safety objectives and how these are applied to Gold Anchor assessments.”

Source location

The Yacht Harbour Association
Page 2 · response
Published 19 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Prescriptive marina regulation is not considered appropriate or practical because circumstances differ between individual marinas.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NB. The TYHA Code of Practice is a guide to best practice for marina operators within TYHA’s membership. It is acknowledged that the circumstances at each marina are different and therefore prescriptive regulation would not be appropriate or practical. Where it is not possible or practical to meet the ideal provisions laid out in the TYHA Code of practice marinas are encouraged to still apply the principles, albeit with appropriate modification.”

Source location

The Yacht Harbour Association
Page 3 · response
Published 19 November 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Publish a member briefing article covering the marina conference’s water-safety session.

    Stated by The Yacht Harbour Association (TYHAStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 November 2024.
  2. 2

    Update marinas and other stakeholders about the revised Code of Practice and changes to water-safety guidance after launch.

    Stated by The Yacht Harbour Association (TYHAStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 November 2024.
  3. 3

    Launch the revised Code of Practice at the ICOMIA World Marina Conference 2025.

    Stated by The Yacht Harbour Association (TYHAStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 November 2024.
  4. 4

    Publish a water-safety article and encourage members to attend the marina conference.

    Stated by The Yacht Harbour Association (TYHAStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 November 2024.
  5. 5

    Brief Gold Anchor assessors on the coroner and police findings concerning Catherine Forbes’s death.

    Stated by The Yacht Harbour Association (TYHAStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 November 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish a member briefing article covering the marina conference’s water-safety session.

Verbatim wording from the response

“100) | May 8th 2025 Fore & Aft Magazine | Member briefing article on TYHA Marina Conference session on water safety | TYHA Office | TYHA members (655) plus halo readers and website visitors | June 2025 Gold Anchor Criteria Review | All information relating to the tragic drowning of Ms Forbes will be considered in the 2024/5 revision of the Gold Anchor criteria | TYHA & Marina Industries Association | TYHA and MIA accredited marinas (213) | Q1 to Q3 2025 Code of Practice (COP) review | All information relating to the tragic drowning of Ms Forbes has been provided to the COP revision team who will use this to revise and update this industry guidance which is used in the UK and internationally | TYHA & Marina Projects | TYHA members (655) | In progress Launch revised Code of Practice | Launch to be conducted at the ICOMIA World Marina Conference 2025 | TYHA & Marina Projects | Circa 500”

Source location

The Yacht Harbour Association
Page 2 · response
Published 19 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update marinas and other stakeholders about the revised Code of Practice and changes to water-safety guidance after launch.

Verbatim wording from the response

“delegates UK & international | Q4 2025 Training of and communication with stakeholders | Once launched TYHA will work with marinas and other stakeholders to update them on the new COP including any changes to water safety guidance | TYHA Office | TYHA members (655) | Ongoing”

Source location

The Yacht Harbour Association
Page 2 · response
Published 19 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Launch the revised Code of Practice at the ICOMIA World Marina Conference 2025.

Verbatim wording from the response

“100) | May 8th 2025 Fore & Aft Magazine | Member briefing article on TYHA Marina Conference session on water safety | TYHA Office | TYHA members (655) plus halo readers and website visitors | June 2025 Gold Anchor Criteria Review | All information relating to the tragic drowning of Ms Forbes will be considered in the 2024/5 revision of the Gold Anchor criteria | TYHA & Marina Industries Association | TYHA and MIA accredited marinas (213) | Q1 to Q3 2025 Code of Practice (COP) review | All information relating to the tragic drowning of Ms Forbes has been provided to the COP revision team who will use this to revise and update this industry guidance which is used in the UK and internationally | TYHA & Marina Projects | TYHA members (655) | In progress Launch revised Code of Practice | Launch to be conducted at the ICOMIA World Marina Conference 2025 | TYHA & Marina Projects | Circa 500”

Source location

The Yacht Harbour Association
Page 2 · response
Published 19 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish a water-safety article and encourage members to attend the marina conference.

Verbatim wording from the response

“| ████████ & Gold Anchor assessors | Assessor team (5) | Feb/March 2025 Fore & Aft Magazine | Water safety article and encouragement for members to come to the marina conference | TYHA Office | TYHA members (655) plus halo readers and website visitors | March 2025 TYHA Marina Conference | Briefing by Tingdene Marinas regarding the tragic drowning of Ms Forbes including lessons learnt and actions taken | Tingdene Marinas | Delegates (approx.”

Source location

The Yacht Harbour Association
Page 2 · response
Published 19 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Brief Gold Anchor assessors on the coroner and police findings concerning Catherine Forbes’s death.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Action | Detail | Who | Reach | Date Email UK marina members (completed) | Email sent to all UK TYHA members (marinas) reminding them to ensure their safety ladder provision is robust and cross referencing to the TYHA COP V7 | TYHA Office | TYHA UK members (554) | 29th November 2024 Brief Gold Anchor assessors (completed) | Initial online briefing delivered to Gold Anchor assessors on the coroner and police reports regarding the tragic death of Catherine Forbes and the associated findings. | ████████ | Assessor team (5) | 5th December 2024 Train Gold Anchor assessors | Annual assessor training to include a session on refining TYHA’s 5 water safety objectives and how these are applied to Gold Anchor assessments.”

Source location

The Yacht Harbour Association
Page 2 · response
Published 19 November 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026