PFD report

Betty SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 27 Oct 2014•Central and South East Kent

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to secure an appropriate High Dependency Unit bed for a high-risk postoperative patient
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate specialist placement arrangements for people requiring specialist carePart of recurring concern: Unreliable hospital bed management and allocation processes
  2. Inadequate pre-operative anaesthetic assessment of high-risk patients
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate preoperative assessment of surgical suitability and riskPart of recurring concern: Unreliable pre-operative assessment arrangements delaying or compromising surgery
  3. Insufficient staffed ITU bed capacity for patients requiring intensive therapy
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient critical care bed capacity
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to secure an appropriate High Dependency Unit bed for a high-risk postoperative patient

Wider context from the report

“• To return Betty SMITH to a ward post-operatively and not secure an High Dependency Unit bed before surgery commenced falls well below accepted care. The expert opinion was concerned that such a high risk patient should have been referred to a Tertiary Centre for a second opinion and probably management. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate specialist placement arrangements for people requiring specialist care; Unreliable hospital bed management and allocation processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate pre-operative anaesthetic assessment of high-risk patients

Wider context from the report

“• The pre-assessment service offered by the Anaesthetic Department is far from adequate. To review such a high risk patient with significant comorbidity from the medical records is not in the patient’s interest. Time should be afforded to the anaesthetists to review the patient at an out-patient clinic pre-operatively to assess the risks and discuss them. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate preoperative assessment of surgical suitability and risk; Unreliable pre-operative assessment arrangements delaying or compromising surgery.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient staffed ITU bed capacity for patients requiring intensive therapy

Wider context from the report

“• Two ITU beds have been closed three months ago due to nursing shortages leaving William Harvey Hospital with just nine ITU beds. This is 4.5 beds per 100,000 population compared to the national average of 6.4 ITU beds. This is presenting the ITU Intensivists with significant difficulties and compromises the care of those patients requiring intensive therapy in a busy district general hospital. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient critical care bed capacity.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to refer high-risk patients to a Tertiary Centre for second opinion and management

Wider context from the report

“• To return Betty SMITH to a ward post-operatively and not secure an High Dependency Unit bed before surgery commenced falls well below accepted care. The expert opinion was concerned that such a high risk patient should have been referred to a Tertiary Centre for a second opinion and probably management. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to obtain timely specialist clinical advice when local expertise is insufficient; Unreliable clinical second-opinion processes; Unreliable referrals to tertiary specialist services.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.