Pamela Keech · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 28 Jul 2017•Northamptonshire

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
5

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 5 recipients

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to include the risk of fatal fistula/graft-site haemorrhage in training requirements
  2. Lack of national guidance on predicting and managing graft/fistula haemorrhage
  3. Failure to escalate fistula/graft-site bleeds for renal or surgical review
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to escalate significant clinical concerns to appropriately senior cliniciansPart of recurring concern: Unreliable and delayed surgical referral and review

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Association of Ambulance Chief Executives and NASMeD

    Request an expert review of UK ambulance clinical practice guidelines for renal patients, specifically covering fistula bleeds.

  2. Association of Ambulance Chief Executives and NASMeD

    Seek specialist advice from the Vascular Access Society of Britain & Ireland on fistula bleeds and hospital conveyance when bleeding has stopped.

  3. Association of Ambulance Chief Executives and NASMeD

    Write, publish and issue any resulting new or updated fistula-bleed guidance to ambulance clinicians through the clinical practice guideline development plan.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee

    AACE and NASMeD are responsible for the full response, while ambulance service leaders hold responsibility for clinical care standards.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  2. Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee

    Setting health education requirements for paramedics is outside JRCALC’s responsibility.

    Outside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to include the risk of fatal fistula/graft-site haemorrhage in training requirements

Wider context from the report

“(2) I heard evidence that the risk of developing a fatal haemorrhage from a fistula/graft site is not part of the training requirement for A&E doctors/paramedic carers ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of national guidance on predicting and managing graft/fistula haemorrhage

Wider context from the report

“(1) I heard evidence that there is no National Guidance on how to predict and manage a fatal graft/fistula haemorrhage ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to escalate fistula/graft-site bleeds for renal or surgical review

Wider context from the report

“(3) I am concerned that other patients presenting with bleeds from fistula/graft sites might not be escalated for renal/surgical review before a fatal bleed presents. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to escalate significant clinical concerns to appropriately senior clinicians; Unreliable and delayed surgical referral and review.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Request an expert review of UK ambulance clinical practice guidelines for renal patients, specifically covering fistula bleeds.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The action that we will be taking is to request that JRCALC, acting as our expert clinical advisors, review the UK ambulance service clinical practice guidelines for the management of renal patients and specifically in relation to fistula bleeds. We will ensure that any recommendations for new or updated guidance is written, published and issued to our ambulance clinicians as part of our ongoing clinical practice guideline development plan.”

Source location

2017-0327-Response-by-Association-of-Ambulance
Page 1 · response
Published 2 December 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Seek specialist advice from the Vascular Access Society of Britain & Ireland on fistula bleeds and hospital conveyance when bleeding has stopped.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, have written to the Vascular Access Society of Britain & Ireland to seek specialist advice in relation to fistula bleeds and whether patients should always be conveyed to hospital, particularly when bleeding has stopped. There may be opportunities to develop pathways for our clinicians to have direct clinical discussions with a vascular specialist regarding the most appropriate pre-hospital management of a patient and to agree whether conveying the patient to hospital is required.”

Source location

2017-0327-Response-by-Association-of-Ambulance
Page 1 · response
Published 2 December 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Write, publish and issue any resulting new or updated fistula-bleed guidance to ambulance clinicians through the clinical practice guideline development plan.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The action that we will be taking is to request that JRCALC, acting as our expert clinical advisors, review the UK ambulance service clinical practice guidelines for the management of renal patients and specifically in relation to fistula bleeds. We will ensure that any recommendations for new or updated guidance is written, published and issued to our ambulance clinicians as part of our ongoing clinical practice guideline development plan.”

Source location

2017-0327-Response-by-Association-of-Ambulance
Page 1 · response
Published 2 December 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

AACE and NASMeD are responsible for the full response, while ambulance service leaders hold responsibility for clinical care standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I wish to inform you that JRCALC are not responsible for setting the health education requirements for paramedics and therefore the full response to this PFD will be sent separately to you from the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE) and its clinical advisors the National Ambulance Service Medical Directors (NASMeD).”

Source location

2017-0327-Response-by-the-JRCALC
Page 1 · response
Published 2 December 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Setting health education requirements for paramedics is outside JRCALC’s responsibility.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I wish to inform you that JRCALC are not responsible for setting the health education requirements for paramedics and therefore the full response to this PFD will be sent separately to you from the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE) and its clinical advisors the National Ambulance Service Medical Directors (NASMeD).”

Source location

2017-0327-Response-by-the-JRCALC
Page 1 · response
Published 2 December 2017

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/5

Data last updated 7 September 2026