PFD report

Stephen Peter Simpson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 9 Oct 2014•North Northumberland

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of an entrance lobby or passageway to arrest falls from communal stairs
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risks
  2. Lack of a non-slip surface on communal stairs
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate slip resistance on stairs
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of an entrance lobby or passageway to arrest falls from communal stairs

Wider context from the report

“The design of the building is that there is no entrance lobby or passageway to arrest any accidental fall, with the result that any person who slips or falls while negotiating the communal stairs is liable to sustain serious injury from making impact with the solid external door. Additionally, the stairs are constructed of smooth concrete without the addition of any non-slip surface. Even if a non-slip surface was present, this would not obviate the risk of serious injury or death from impact with the external door, if a person falls from the stairs. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a non-slip surface on communal stairs

Wider context from the report

“The design of the building is that there is no entrance lobby or passageway to arrest any accidental fall, with the result that any person who slips or falls while negotiating the communal stairs is liable to sustain serious injury from making impact with the solid external door. Additionally, the stairs are constructed of smooth concrete without the addition of any non-slip surface. Even if a non-slip surface was present, this would not obviate the risk of serious injury or death from impact with the external door, if a person falls from the stairs. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate slip resistance on stairs.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.