PFD report

KEVIN JOHN FITTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 28 May 2021•Brighton and Hove

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
12

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
19

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised12

  1. Poor or inadequate implementation of Care Act assessments
    Part of recurring concern: Untimely or incomplete community care assessments
  2. Failure to seek specialist Acquired Brain Injury support
  3. Failure to respond to deterioration in living conditions, physical health and drug use
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to recognise and act on deterioration in vulnerable adults’ living circumstances and support needs
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Action

    Continue acquired brain injury training while increasing practitioner engagement and extending its content and duration.

    Stated by Brighton and Hove City CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 27 May 2021.
  2. Action

    Explore joint commissioning with health to establish specialist access for capacity assessments involving acquired brain injury.

    Stated by Brighton and Hove City CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 May 2021.
  3. Action

    Continue attending the police-led multi-agency cuckooing meeting, promote directorate awareness and seek wider learning.

    Stated by Brighton and Hove City CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 27 May 2021.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Poor or inadequate implementation of Care Act assessments

Wider context from the report

“(9) There was a reasonable Care Act Assessment in 2017 however it was poorly/inadequately implemented. It should have been repeated annually – it was not. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Untimely or incomplete community care assessments.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to seek specialist Acquired Brain Injury support

Wider context from the report

“(2) There was a failure to seek specialist support regarding Acquired Brain Injury (ABI). ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to respond to deterioration in living conditions, physical health and drug use

Wider context from the report

“(7) There was a failure to react to the deterioration in Mr Fitton’s living conditions, his being cuckooed, the downward slide in his physical health and the increase in his drug use. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to recognise and act on deterioration in vulnerable adults’ living circumstances and support needs.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to repeat Care Act assessments annually

Wider context from the report

“(9) There was a reasonable Care Act Assessment in 2017 however it was poorly/inadequately implemented. It should have been repeated annually – it was not. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide required annual Care Act reviews.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of training on the Mental Capacity Act and Care Act Codes of Practice

Wider context from the report

“(8) Staff received no adequate training in dealing with ABI. There was no training on the Codes of Practice for the Mental Capacity Act or the Care Act. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of lead and coordination

Wider context from the report

“(6) Lead and Co-ordination were lacking. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to use best interests policy appropriately

Wider context from the report

“(1) There was an almost complete reliance of assumption of capacity. The lack of capacity assessments resulted in failure to identify the area and support needed by Mr Fitton and a failure to use best interests policy appropriately. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable best-interests decision-making processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to understand how Acquired Brain Injury affects abilities

Wider context from the report

“(3) There was a failure to understand the way Mr Fitton’s ABI impacted on his abilities. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to understand the interaction between Acquired Brain Injury and substance use

Wider context from the report

“(4) There was a failure to understand how ABI impacted on Mr Fitton’s substance use and vice versa. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Poor communication between teams and individuals

Wider context from the report

“(5) Communication between the various teams and individuals were poor. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate staff training in Acquired Brain Injury

Wider context from the report

“(8) Staff received no adequate training in dealing with ABI. There was no training on the Codes of Practice for the Mental Capacity Act or the Care Act. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of capacity assessments

Wider context from the report

“(1) There was an almost complete reliance of assumption of capacity. The lack of capacity assessments resulted in failure to identify the area and support needed by Mr Fitton and a failure to use best interests policy appropriately. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to recognise impaired decision-making capacity in care decisions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue acquired brain injury training while increasing practitioner engagement and extending its content and duration.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• We will continue to provide standalone training courses on Acquired Brain Injury and will encourage practitioner engagement in this training course as well as extending the content depth and duration.”

Source location

2021-0169-Responses-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners-and-Brighton-and-Hove-City-Council_Published
Page 4 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Explore joint commissioning with health to establish specialist access for capacity assessments involving acquired brain injury.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• We will take forward the area of Social Work practitioner access to specialists when undertaking capacity assessments with people with new or historic ABI and/or when the specific brain impairment necessitates a specialist. We will explore a joint commissioning arrangement with health to agree a pathway for our health and adult social care practitioners to access.”

Source location

2021-0169-Responses-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners-and-Brighton-and-Hove-City-Council_Published
Page 4 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue attending the police-led multi-agency cuckooing meeting, promote directorate awareness and seek wider learning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• We will continue to attend the police led multi agency cuckooing meeting and encourage increased awareness of this within our directorate and we will seek opportunities for wider learning from this meeting.”

Source location

2021-0169-Responses-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners-and-Brighton-and-Hove-City-Council_Published
Page 5 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review Care Act training and adjust it to refresh multi-agency coordination and consideration of review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• We will review our Care Act training on offer and make any adjustments necessary to ensure that the key aspect of co-ordination in multi-agency work, and consideration of review, are refreshed features.”

Source location

2021-0169-Responses-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners-and-Brighton-and-Hove-City-Council_Published
Page 4 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review internal casework risk-management protocols to strengthen organisational oversight.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• We will review our internal risk management protocols for casework to strengthen our organisational oversight.”

Source location

2021-0169-Responses-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners-and-Brighton-and-Hove-City-Council_Published
Page 5 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and refresh Mental Capacity Act training, monitor attendance and refresher completion, and communicate attendance requirements to frontline teams.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• We will review our existing Mental Capacity Act (In Practice) training which includes the Code of Practice, and guidance on use of the Best Interests process and refresh the message on ensuring good practice of this. We will monitor practitioner take up of the training, percentage attended and those who have refreshed, and communicate with front line teams to ensure practitioners attend these and refresh regularly.”

Source location

2021-0169-Responses-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners-and-Brighton-and-Hove-City-Council_Published
Page 4 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop standalone training on mental capacity assessments and executive functioning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• We will develop a stand-alone training course on Mental Capacity Assessments and executive functioning/capacity”

Source location

2021-0169-Responses-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners-and-Brighton-and-Hove-City-Council_Published
Page 4 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.12

  1. 1

    Continue promoting consultation with relevant experts for substance misuse casework.

    Stated by Brighton and Hove City CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 27 May 2021.
  2. 2

    Continue providing self-neglect training incorporating Safeguarding Adults Review outcomes and decision-making.

    Stated by Brighton and Hove City CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 27 May 2021.
  3. 3

    Consider implementing specialised psychologically informed environment trauma training.

    Stated by Brighton and Hove City CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 May 2021.
  4. 4

    Continue engaging Safeguarding Adults Board partners to support acquired brain injury service improvement.

    Stated by Sussex NHS CommissionersStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 27 May 2021.
  5. 5

    Add creative inter-agency responses to non-engagement in safeguarding adults training.

    Stated by Brighton and Hove City CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 May 2021.
  6. 6

    Work with partners to finalise the Sussex-wide Safeguarding Adults Board escalation and resolution policy.

    Stated by Brighton and Hove City CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 27 May 2021.
  7. 7

    Share the response with health partners involved in commissioning services and specialist accommodation.

    Stated by Brighton and Hove City CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 May 2021.
  8. 8

    Include the Safeguarding Adults Review action plan and concerns in safeguarding governance, quality assurance and performance groups.

    Stated by Brighton and Hove City CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 May 2021.
  9. 9

    Implement and operate a directorate non-engagement policy.

    Stated by Brighton and Hove City CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 27 May 2021.
  10. 10

    Request that Learning and Development consultants read Safeguarding Adults Reviews and incorporate lessons into relevant training.

    Stated by Brighton and Hove City CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 May 2021.
  11. 11

    Provide directorate monitoring and governance of the responses and actions through the Practice Development and Assurance Board.

    Stated by Brighton and Hove City CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 May 2021.
  12. 12

    Review commissioned services to consider specific provision for people with acquired brain injuries.

    Stated by Sussex NHS CommissionersStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 27 May 2021.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue promoting consultation with relevant experts for substance misuse casework.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• We acknowledge the value of a specific expertise to support substance misuse casework in Health and Adult Social Care and will continue to encourage awareness and understanding of the importance of consulting relevant expert staff where appropriate.”

Source location

2021-0169-Responses-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners-and-Brighton-and-Hove-City-Council_Published
Page 5 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue providing self-neglect training incorporating Safeguarding Adults Review outcomes and decision-making.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• We will continue to provide training on self-neglect which references SAR outcomes and decision making”

Source location

2021-0169-Responses-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners-and-Brighton-and-Hove-City-Council_Published
Page 4 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider implementing specialised psychologically informed environment trauma training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• While there is existing training on trauma available within the Local Authority we are actively considering the implementation of further specialised training on trauma, namely the PIE model (psychologically informed environments) which other areas of the Local Authority have found useful in terms of enhancing their systems and processes to better enable access and understanding.”

Source location

2021-0169-Responses-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners-and-Brighton-and-Hove-City-Council_Published
Page 4 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue engaging Safeguarding Adults Board partners to support acquired brain injury service improvement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Clinical Commissioning Group will continue to engage with partner organisations in the Safeguarding Adults Board to support service improvement for people with acquired brain injuries.”

Source location

2021-0169-Responses-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners-and-Brighton-and-Hove-City-Council_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add creative inter-agency responses to non-engagement in safeguarding adults training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• We will ensure that our Safeguarding training contains additional focus on non-engagement in safeguarding adults responses to cover where this needs to be provided creatively between partner agencies (for example, as was the case with Mr Fitton, the person will not engage with the Local Authority Social Worker).”

Source location

2021-0169-Responses-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners-and-Brighton-and-Hove-City-Council_Published
Page 4 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with partners to finalise the Sussex-wide Safeguarding Adults Board escalation and resolution policy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• We will work with our partners to finalise the Sussex wide SAB escalation and resolution policy which is being developed.”

Source location

2021-0169-Responses-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners-and-Brighton-and-Hove-City-Council_Published
Page 5 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the response with health partners involved in commissioning services and specialist accommodation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• We will share these responses with our health partners in commissioning of services and specialist accommodation.”

Source location

2021-0169-Responses-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners-and-Brighton-and-Hove-City-Council_Published
Page 5 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include the Safeguarding Adults Review action plan and concerns in safeguarding governance, quality assurance and performance groups.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• We will ensure that the SAR action plan and your concerns are included in our Safeguarding Adults Governance, Quality Assurance and Performance groups”

Source location

2021-0169-Responses-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners-and-Brighton-and-Hove-City-Council_Published
Page 4 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement and operate a directorate non-engagement policy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• We have designed and implemented a non-engagement policy within the directorate which is now live.”

Source location

2021-0169-Responses-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners-and-Brighton-and-Hove-City-Council_Published
Page 4 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Request that Learning and Development consultants read Safeguarding Adults Reviews and incorporate lessons into relevant training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• We will request that all Learning and Development consultants are enabled within our Workforce Development Team to read SARs and ensure that lessons are incorporated into relevant training.”

Source location

2021-0169-Responses-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners-and-Brighton-and-Hove-City-Council_Published
Page 5 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide directorate monitoring and governance of the responses and actions through the Practice Development and Assurance Board.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• We will provide monitoring and governance of these responses and actions through our Practice Development and Assurance Board within the directorate.”

Source location

2021-0169-Responses-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners-and-Brighton-and-Hove-City-Council_Published
Page 5 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review commissioned services to consider specific provision for people with acquired brain injuries.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Within the plan the Clinical Commissioning Group is required to share the report with commissioners so as to give consideration to how long term service delivery can be improved for people with acquired brain injuries. The report has been shared with commissioners who are reviewing how acquired brain injuries can be specifically considered within the services that are commissioned.”

Source location

2021-0169-Responses-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners-and-Brighton-and-Hove-City-Council_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026