PFD report

Mark Stephen Anthony Simon KUBIAK · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 22 Mar 2019•Milton Keynes

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure of the transfer checklist to require oxygen supply checks
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe transfer and connection of portable oxygen supplies
  2. Failure of the transfer checklist to require tug tests
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe transfer and connection of portable oxygen supplies
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the transfer checklist to require oxygen supply checks

Wider context from the report

“That the Thames Valley Transfer Network Checklist does not require the oxygen supply to be checked, or for a tug test to be completed at the time that the oxygen is transferred from the ward supply in the hospital to the portable cylinder. If such a check and test had been carried out, the failure of the oxygen flow to the patient would immediately have been noticed and the situation rectified. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe transfer and connection of portable oxygen supplies.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the transfer checklist to require tug tests

Wider context from the report

“That the Thames Valley Transfer Network Checklist does not require the oxygen supply to be checked, or for a tug test to be completed at the time that the oxygen is transferred from the ward supply in the hospital to the portable cylinder. If such a check and test had been carried out, the failure of the oxygen flow to the patient would immediately have been noticed and the situation rectified. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe transfer and connection of portable oxygen supplies.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.