PFD report

Joseph Tarnowski · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 Aug 2017•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Residents' lack of awareness that wireless call-bells can be moved around their rooms
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable call bell systems for summoning assistance
  2. Inability of residents reliant on mobility aids to move portable call-bells
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable call bell systems for summoning assistance
  3. Failure to consider wearable call-bells for residents
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Provide residents with wearable mobile call bells to summon assistance after falls.

    Stated by Hillbrook GrangeStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 October 2017.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Residents' lack of awareness that wireless call-bells can be moved around their rooms

Wider context from the report

“In evidence at the inquest, it was confirmed that Mr Tarnowski summoned assistance by shouting out to staff rather than by using his call-bell. It became apparent during the course of the hearing that Mr Tarnowski may not have been aware that his call-bell was wireless, and as such could be moved around his room. Additionally, the evidence revealed that even had Mr Tarnowski been aware that his call-bell was portable, he may not have been able to move it due to his reliance on a mobility aid. At the time of the inquest, consideration had not been given to introducing call bells which are worn by residents of fashion that are apparently in use in some other similar residential care setting. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable call bell systems for summoning assistance.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inability of residents reliant on mobility aids to move portable call-bells

Wider context from the report

“In evidence at the inquest, it was confirmed that Mr Tarnowski summoned assistance by shouting out to staff rather than by using his call-bell. It became apparent during the course of the hearing that Mr Tarnowski may not have been aware that his call-bell was wireless, and as such could be moved around his room. Additionally, the evidence revealed that even had Mr Tarnowski been aware that his call-bell was portable, he may not have been able to move it due to his reliance on a mobility aid. At the time of the inquest, consideration had not been given to introducing call bells which are worn by residents of fashion that are apparently in use in some other similar residential care setting. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable call bell systems for summoning assistance.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider wearable call-bells for residents

Wider context from the report

“In evidence at the inquest, it was confirmed that Mr Tarnowski summoned assistance by shouting out to staff rather than by using his call-bell. It became apparent during the course of the hearing that Mr Tarnowski may not have been aware that his call-bell was wireless, and as such could be moved around his room. Additionally, the evidence revealed that even had Mr Tarnowski been aware that his call-bell was portable, he may not have been able to move it due to his reliance on a mobility aid. At the time of the inquest, consideration had not been given to introducing call bells which are worn by residents of fashion that are apparently in use in some other similar residential care setting. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide residents with wearable mobile call bells to summon assistance after falls.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am happy to say that from this verdict and report we have taken prompt and responsive action by way of providing residents with call bells that are to be worn around their necks. This was immediately actioned following the registered manager’s participation into the inquest. Consequently, the board of directors approved and purchased the call bells without delay and the system was implemented within the week.”

Source location

2017-0247-Response-by-Hillbrook-Grange_Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 1 October 2017

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026