PFD report

VAN THAI TUYEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 22 Feb 2022•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of a unified approach to address ongoing use of misplaced nasogastric tubes
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe management of Ryles and nasogastric tubes
  2. Continuing use of misplaced nasogastric tubes to administer liquids or medications
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a unified approach to address ongoing use of misplaced nasogastric tubes

Wider context from the report

“(1) Using a misplaced nasogastric tube is recognised as a ‘never event’, namely an event which is wholly preventable and should never happen. (2) The court heard evidence at the inquest that an NHS improvement patient safety alert issued in 2016 identified that between 2011-2016 there had been 95 incidents of misplaced nasogastric tubes used to administer fluids or medication, 32 of which resulted in death. (3) The court heard that there had been Barts NHS Trust had had at least 7 incidents relating to misplaced nasogastric tube since 2012. (4) The court heard that the use of misplaced nasogastric tubes to administer liquids or medications continues to take place in Trusts across the country (5) The court heard that there is no unified approach to address the on going issue of avoidable deaths caused by using misplaced nasogastric tubes. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe management of Ryles and nasogastric tubes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continuing use of misplaced nasogastric tubes to administer liquids or medications

Wider context from the report

“(1) Using a misplaced nasogastric tube is recognised as a ‘never event’, namely an event which is wholly preventable and should never happen. (2) The court heard evidence at the inquest that an NHS improvement patient safety alert issued in 2016 identified that between 2011-2016 there had been 95 incidents of misplaced nasogastric tubes used to administer fluids or medication, 32 of which resulted in death. (3) The court heard that there had been Barts NHS Trust had had at least 7 incidents relating to misplaced nasogastric tube since 2012. (4) The court heard that the use of misplaced nasogastric tubes to administer liquids or medications continues to take place in Trusts across the country (5) The court heard that there is no unified approach to address the on going issue of avoidable deaths caused by using misplaced nasogastric tubes. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Award £25 million over five years through NIHR to fund six Patient Safety Research Collaborations addressing patient-safety challenges.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 February 2022.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Award £25 million over five years through NIHR to fund six Patient Safety Research Collaborations addressing patient-safety challenges.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To support this, and following an open competition, the Department has awarded £25 million of funding over the next five years via the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) for research on patient safety to improve the safe delivery of health and care. The funding is for six NIHR Patient Safety Research Collaborations (PSRCs) across England to help improve understanding and resolution of patient safety challenges. The PSRCs will”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 1 · response
Published 28 February 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026