PFD report

John Reginald Moreton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 9 Jan 2016•Stoke-on-Trent and North Staffordshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of warning signs for pedestrians and motorists approaching the crossing
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of pedestrian crossing risksPart of recurring concern: Inadequate road warning signage
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of warning signs for pedestrians and motorists approaching the crossing

Wider context from the report

“The collision occurred when the deceased attempted to cross the busy dual carriageway A500 at a point approximately one half mile from the A34 exit. This road links junction 16 of the M6 with Stoke-on-Trent and is generally in a southbound direction. The deceased had approached the edge of the dual carriageway after using a pedestrian's stile which led him directly to this point and where there is a gap in the central reservation to enable pedestrians to cross to the northbound carriageway and continue over another stile. There are no warning signs of the clear and present danger either for pedestrians or motorists on their approaches. The deceased was struck by a car and would have died instantly. The footpath has been in situ for many years prior to the construction of the A500 in the 1970s. I am not aware of any previous fatality but the danger is obvious with a road having the national speed limit. Warning signs of pedestrians crossing are common elsewhere in the county. I am advocating they should be erected here. Another rambler was seen to cross this busy road whilst officers were still at the scene. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of pedestrian crossing risks; Inadequate road warning signage.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.