Archie Campbell Bruce · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 18 Apr 2024•West Yorkshire (Western)

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of consistent drug-use guidance, education and training across all tiers of the sport
  2. Provision for dispensations from welfare policy and standards at clubs outside the Super League

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Rugby Football League

    Stand down players from playing until they complete all mandatory online education modules.

  2. Rugby Football League

    Require clubs to complete mandatory online education modules two months before the season starts.

  3. Rugby Football League

    Consider removing the provision allowing clubs to obtain dispensation from Player Welfare Policy and Standards requirements.

  4. Rugby Football League

    Review the Overseas Travel Code of Conduct, specifically player behaviour and safeguards for younger or less experienced players.

  5. Rugby Football League

    Review mandatory training requirements annually and when a significant issue is identified.

  6. Rugby Football League

    Introduce policy and procedure changes through the annual review process.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Rugby Football League

    Current policies, procedures and training are not deficient and would not contribute to a death occurring in similar circumstances.

    Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
  2. Rugby Football League

    Existing guidance, education and training on illicit and prescription drug misuse are considered appropriate, so further overarching provision is unnecessary.

    Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of consistent drug-use guidance, education and training across all tiers of the sport

Wider context from the report

“During the inquest I heard evidence of the systems for training and educating players with regard to their illicit use of drugs. In addition I considered written submissions from the legal representatives of the RFL, Batley Rugby Club and the family. I also noted copies of the Overseas Travel Code of Conduct for squads submitted by RFL along with the Player Welfare Policy for the Super League and full time Clubs. • I have noted that the Welfare Policy and Standards provides provision for Clubs outside the Super League to apply for a dispensation primarily on the basis of resources. • I would ask that consideration be given to the appropriateness of amending this provision so that there is not a relaxation of the rules in clubs outside the Super League, given that it is clubs outside the Super League where young players start off their careers, and given their immaturity are more likely to benefit from education and a defined Code of Conduct • RFL to consider the appropriateness of over arching guidance, education and training with respect to the code of conduct without dispensations, with regard to the use of both illicit drugs and misuse of prescription drugs, in order to ensure consistency of application of education throughout all tiers of the sport. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provision for dispensations from welfare policy and standards at clubs outside the Super League

Wider context from the report

“During the inquest I heard evidence of the systems for training and educating players with regard to their illicit use of drugs. In addition I considered written submissions from the legal representatives of the RFL, Batley Rugby Club and the family. I also noted copies of the Overseas Travel Code of Conduct for squads submitted by RFL along with the Player Welfare Policy for the Super League and full time Clubs. • I have noted that the Welfare Policy and Standards provides provision for Clubs outside the Super League to apply for a dispensation primarily on the basis of resources. • I would ask that consideration be given to the appropriateness of amending this provision so that there is not a relaxation of the rules in clubs outside the Super League, given that it is clubs outside the Super League where young players start off their careers, and given their immaturity are more likely to benefit from education and a defined Code of Conduct • RFL to consider the appropriateness of over arching guidance, education and training with respect to the code of conduct without dispensations, with regard to the use of both illicit drugs and misuse of prescription drugs, in order to ensure consistency of application of education throughout all tiers of the sport. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Stand down players from playing until they complete all mandatory online education modules.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The modules are hosted on the RFL’s “Our Learning Zone” (the RFL’s education site, hosted on the HIVE platform). This year the RFL have covered topics including: Anti-Doping, Concussion, Gambling and Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity. These were identified by the RFL as critical modules to deliver to the Professional Game.”

Source location

Response from Rugby Football League
Page 8 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require clubs to complete mandatory online education modules two months before the season starts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“For the Professional Game (encompassing Men’s and Women’s first teams, reserves and academy) Clubs are expected to assist with the delivery of mandated education. Clubs are given a set time frame for each player, support staff and those persons subject to the Operation Rules to complete a set of online modules.”

Source location

Response from Rugby Football League
Page 8 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider removing the provision allowing clubs to obtain dispensation from Player Welfare Policy and Standards requirements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In fact, it should be noted that the RFL has not received any applications for dispensation (on any grounds) from any club currently playing within the professional game (incorporating tier 1 through to tier 3). Bearing this in mind, and acknowledging the Coroner’s concerns, the RFL are of the view the provision to allow clubs to apply for a dispensation from the Player Welfare Policy is in fact no longer necessary. The RFL are therefore considering removing this provision from the latest draft of the Player Welfare Policy and Standards.”

Source location

Response from Rugby Football League
Page 5 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the Overseas Travel Code of Conduct, specifically player behaviour and safeguards for younger or less experienced players.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The RFL has already introduced changes to its policies and procedures since Archie’s death as a consequence of its annual review process. In addition, the RFL will be reviewing its Overseas Code of Conduct with specific reference to player behaviour and how it can safeguard more impressionable younger/less experienced Players. This will take place this year in accordance with its regulatory review process. It is not right that its clubs outside the Super League where young players commence their careers. The majority of professional players are scouted by the academies of Super League Clubs, who are all required to adhere to the RFL policies and procedures.”

Source location

Response from Rugby Football League
Page 9 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review mandatory training requirements annually and when a significant issue is identified.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The RFL will review mandatory training requirements each year, and in the event of a significant issue being identified.”

Source location

Response from Rugby Football League
Page 9 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce policy and procedure changes through the annual review process.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The RFL has already introduced changes to its policies and procedures since Archie’s death as a consequence of its annual review process. In addition, the RFL will be reviewing its Overseas Code of Conduct with specific reference to player behaviour and how it can safeguard more impressionable younger/less experienced Players. This will take place this year in accordance with its regulatory review process. It is not right that its clubs outside the Super League where young players commence their careers. The majority of professional players are scouted by the academies of Super League Clubs, who are all required to adhere to the RFL policies and procedures.”

Source location

Response from Rugby Football League
Page 9 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Current policies, procedures and training are not deficient and would not contribute to a death occurring in similar circumstances.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In summary, the RFL do not believe that its current policies, procedures and training information are deficient, or indeed would contribute in any way to a death occurring in similar circumstances to the sad death of Archie Bruce. Notwithstanding this, the RFL have carefully considered the Coroner’s concerns, and will give further consideration to removing the provision allowing clubs to apply for a dispensation from the requirements of the Player Welfare Policy and Standards - despite no club seeking to rely upon this provision.”

Source location

Response from Rugby Football League
Page 9 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing guidance, education and training on illicit and prescription drug misuse are considered appropriate, so further overarching provision is unnecessary.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The RFL are satisfied that it currently provides appropriate guidance, education and training with respect to the code of conduct, with regard to the use of both illicit drugs and misuse of prescription drugs. In the event the Player Welfare Policy is amended to remove the provision to allow a club to apply for a dispensation from the requirements of the Player Welfare Policy, ongoing training will of course reflect these changes.”

Source location

Response from Rugby Football League
Page 9 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026