PFD report

Benjamin Orrill · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 19 Oct 2016•Leicester City and South Leicestershire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to subject advanced nurse practitioners to stringent appraisal and revalidation processes
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable staff appraisal and performance-review processes
  2. Lack of direct employer responsibility and supervision for some advanced nurse practitioners
  3. Lack of regulatory oversight for advanced nurse practitioners
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.4

  1. Position

    Existing statutory regulation and revalidation are considered sufficient to protect the public against risks associated with advanced nursing practice.

    Stated by Nursing and Midwifery CouncilExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to subject advanced nurse practitioners to stringent appraisal and revalidation processes

Wider context from the report

“During the course of the Inquest it came to my attention that there is no regulatory body for advanced nurse practitioners. It would appear they are not subject to the same stringent appraisal and revalidation processes such that GPs currently are, despite the fact that they may perform similar duties and can have parallel roles. I also became aware that some advance nurse practitioners may independently buy into a partnership and may not have an employer directly responsible for their appraisal. Therefore some may potentially be operating as independent practitioners without any supervision or regulation. I am concerned that this may have a significant impact on patient safety. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable staff appraisal and performance-review processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of direct employer responsibility and supervision for some advanced nurse practitioners

Wider context from the report

“During the course of the Inquest it came to my attention that there is no regulatory body for advanced nurse practitioners. It would appear they are not subject to the same stringent appraisal and revalidation processes such that GPs currently are, despite the fact that they may perform similar duties and can have parallel roles. I also became aware that some advance nurse practitioners may independently buy into a partnership and may not have an employer directly responsible for their appraisal. Therefore some may potentially be operating as independent practitioners without any supervision or regulation. I am concerned that this may have a significant impact on patient safety. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of regulatory oversight for advanced nurse practitioners

Wider context from the report

“During the course of the Inquest it came to my attention that there is no regulatory body for advanced nurse practitioners. It would appear they are not subject to the same stringent appraisal and revalidation processes such that GPs currently are, despite the fact that they may perform similar duties and can have parallel roles. I also became aware that some advance nurse practitioners may independently buy into a partnership and may not have an employer directly responsible for their appraisal. Therefore some may potentially be operating as independent practitioners without any supervision or regulation. I am concerned that this may have a significant impact on patient safety. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing statutory regulation and revalidation are considered sufficient to protect the public against risks associated with advanced nursing practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will not be taking any further action in relation to the concerns you have raised because, for the reasons we summarise in the enclosed document, we believe that our statutory framework and the process of revalidation are sufficient to protect the public in respect of advanced practice.”

Source location

2016-0367-Response-by-NMC
Page 1 · response
Published 19 October 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Nursing and Midwifery Council is responsible for nurses’ standards, registration, revalidation and professional regulation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1.0 There is no regulatory body for advanced nurse practitioners: NHS England has no jurisdiction over the regulation of nurses. The NMC is the body which sets standards of education, training, conduct and performance and ensures that nurses and midwives keep their skills and knowledge up to date and uphold professional standards. They have processes to investigate nurses and midwives who do not meet those requisite standards and maintain a register of nurses and midwives allowed to practice in the UK.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 19 October 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Supervision or regulation of registered nurses practising independently falls outside NHS England’s mandate.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2.0 Advanced nurse practitioners may independently buy into a partnership and may not have an employer directly responsible for their appraisal; and therefore may be operating as independent practitioners without any supervision or regulation. Again NHS England has no mandate in relation to registered nurses who have chosen to practise independently. Those registrants remain accountable to the NMC as their regulatory body and through a process of professional revalidation are expected to maintain their registration.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 19 October 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Regulation of nurses, including advanced nurse practitioners, falls outside NHS England’s jurisdiction.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1.0 There is no regulatory body for advanced nurse practitioners: NHS England has no jurisdiction over the regulation of nurses. The NMC is the body which sets standards of education, training, conduct and performance and ensures that nurses and midwives keep their skills and knowledge up to date and uphold professional standards. They have processes to investigate nurses and midwives who do not meet those requisite standards and maintain a register of nurses and midwives allowed to practice in the UK.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 19 October 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026