PFD report

Ajvir Singh Sandhu and Cameron James Forster · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 8 Dec 2016•North Yorkshire (East)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of mandatory spin recovery training before flying specific types of light aircraft and carrying out aerobatics
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure mandatory safety training is completed before safety-critical workPart of recurring concern: Inadequate pilot training and competence for abnormal aircraft handling
  2. Failure to ensure aircraft-specific handling training and proficiency in recovering from uncontrolled conditions
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate pilot training and competence for abnormal aircraft handling
  3. Lack of provision of static-line parachutes for aircraft of this nature
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of mandatory spin recovery training before flying specific types of light aircraft and carrying out aerobatics

Wider context from the report

“2 That there should be a review taking place of whether regulations should be introduced to make spin recovery training mandatory on specific types of light aircraft before a person can fly that light aircraft and carry out aerobatics. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure mandatory safety training is completed before safety-critical work; Inadequate pilot training and competence for abnormal aircraft handling.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure aircraft-specific handling training and proficiency in recovering from uncontrolled conditions

Wider context from the report

“3. Evidence was given from the AAIB that whilst it was clear that Mr Sandhu had had spin recovery training within the Royal Air Force that spin recovery training had taken place on two different aircraft and not the Slingsby Firefly. Concern has been expressed within the Inquest that in an aircraft well understood to have areas requiring specific handling techniques it should be established that the persons who fly them are trained and proficient in those areas and have the ability to recover the aircraft from an uncontrolled condition. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate pilot training and competence for abnormal aircraft handling.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of provision of static-line parachutes for aircraft of this nature

Wider context from the report

“1. The two lead investigators from the AAIB stated that neither occupant was wearing a parachute and that parachutes were not supplied but had they done so and abandoned the aircraft at a safe height that would have offered both of them the possibility of survival. The AAIB referred me to leaflet number 90 issued by the CAA relating to static line parachutes and I would advise that further consideration should be given to whether those leaflets should be revised and/or that regulations are introduced making mandatory the provision of parachutes with static lines for aircraft of this nature. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.