PFD report

Harry Glibbery · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Aug 2016•Plymouth, Torbay and South Devon

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Inability to weigh patients reliably
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably monitor patients' weights
  2. Failure to prescribe Clexane in accordance with Derriford Protocol
  3. Failure of Pharmacy reviews to identify prescription errors
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable detection and monitoring of prescription errors
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Monitor postoperative patient weighing with Senior Nurses.

    Stated by University Hospitals Plymouth NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 August 2016.
  2. Action

    Implement ePMA order sets linked to diagnosis, with weight-based dose calculation and time-limited weight updates.

    Stated by University Hospitals Plymouth NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 August 2016.
  3. Action

    Review the three therapeutic Clexane protocols through the Thrombosis Committee.

    Stated by University Hospitals Plymouth NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 August 2016.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inability to weigh patients reliably

Wider context from the report

“(3) I was advised that during Mr Glibbery’s admission he lost a substantial amount of weight estimated at between 6 – 10 kilograms. ████████ (who gave evidence) expressed their difficulties in having patients weighed. This is particularly difficult for patients who have undergone hip replacements where, I was told, a hoist that is available is not high enough to return patients back to their beds. The importance of this is obvious in patients whose medication is weight-dependent. It is believed that Mr Glibbery was on the cusp of requiring a downward review of the amount of Clexane prescribed to him. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably monitor patients' weights.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to prescribe Clexane in accordance with Derriford Protocol

Wider context from the report

“(1) The doctor who originally prescribed the Clexane did not do so in accordance with Derriford Protocol; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of Pharmacy reviews to identify prescription errors

Wider context from the report

“(2) The doctor’s prescription error was not identified during Pharmacy reviews intended to pick up precisely this sort of shortcoming; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable detection and monitoring of prescription errors.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor postoperative patient weighing with Senior Nurses.

Verbatim wording from the response

“measurements being taken, even if there are considerable technical issues. We will monitor this with the Senior Nurses. This does represent significant challenges, both as a result of the patient’s condition and the various mechanisms which are common to patients in this particular.”

Source location

2016-0292-Response-by-Plymouth-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 16 August 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement ePMA order sets linked to diagnosis, with weight-based dose calculation and time-limited weight updates.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Furthermore, the Trust will be investing in the implementation of an electronic prescribing and medicines administration (ePMA) system during 2017. This system will include the use of “order sets” linked to diagnosis, which will ensure that the correct protocol is chosen. For weight specific dosing the patient’s weight will have to be entered in to the system and the dose will be automatically calculated. It will be possible for this functionality to be time limited, such that a new weight would have to be entered at a defined point in time (e.g. every 7 days) and a new dose calculated.”

Source location

2016-0292-Response-by-Plymouth-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 16 August 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the three therapeutic Clexane protocols through the Thrombosis Committee.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There are currently three protocols for the use of “therapeutic” Clexane (i.e. not prophylactic use) – DVT / PE protocol; “Bridging therapy” protocol for patients that are routinely prescribed warfarin prior to admission; protocol for the management of Acute Coronary Syndrome. In response to this incident, these protocols will be reviewed by the Thrombosis Committee and clear guidance disseminated across the Trust.”

Source location

2016-0292-Response-by-Plymouth-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 16 August 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver a pharmacist learning package covering therapeutic Clexane dosing, weight dependence and weight-loss-related dose changes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In response to this incident we have developed a learning package which is being delivered by the Deputy Senior Pharmacist to all pharmacists within the department emphasising the following points:”

Source location

2016-0292-Response-by-Plymouth-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 16 August 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate clear therapeutic Clexane protocol guidance across the Trust.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There are currently three protocols for the use of “therapeutic” Clexane (i.e. not prophylactic use) – DVT / PE protocol; “Bridging therapy” protocol for patients that are routinely prescribed warfarin prior to admission; protocol for the management of Acute Coronary Syndrome. In response to this incident, these protocols will be reviewed by the Thrombosis Committee and clear guidance disseminated across the Trust.”

Source location

2016-0292-Response-by-Plymouth-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 16 August 2016

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Discuss the importance of postoperative patient weighing with nursing staff despite technical difficulties.

    Stated by University Hospitals Plymouth NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 August 2016.
  2. 2

    Require pharmacists to record treatment challenges or confirmations in the medical notes, with future entry through ePMA.

    Stated by University Hospitals Plymouth NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 16 August 2016.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss the importance of postoperative patient weighing with nursing staff despite technical difficulties.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In relation to weighing patients who have had operations, this can be difficult particularly with hip operations because of the risk of damaging the hip with a hoist system and secondly that the hoist with the weighing scales in place does not clear the beds. We have discussed this with the nursing staff and identified the importance of these weight”

Source location

2016-0292-Response-by-Plymouth-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 16 August 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require pharmacists to record treatment challenges or confirmations in the medical notes, with future entry through ePMA.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, steps are being taken to ensure that the pharmacists make appropriate records in the medical notes when challenging / confirming treatments. In the future, this will be required to be input into the ePMA system.”

Source location

2016-0292-Response-by-Plymouth-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 16 August 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026