PFD report

David Alan White · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 11 Nov 2015•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to record and act on Heparin-induced confusion
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to identify clinically significant medication risks
  2. Lack of supervision arrangements for falls and mobilisation risk
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risks
  3. Failure to review and act on nursing risk records
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Action

    Include verbal handover of falls-risk patients’ care plans in nursing handover safety briefings.

    Stated by Barts Health NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 November 2015.
  2. Action

    Move Ward 9F multidisciplinary meetings earlier to develop falls-risk action plans and communicate overnight deterioration.

    Stated by Barts Health NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 November 2015.
  3. Action

    Reinforce documenting drug allergies and adverse effects and escalate drug-related issues to senior clinical staff.

    Stated by Barts Health NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 November 2015.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to record and act on Heparin-induced confusion

Wider context from the report

“(1) The effect of Heparin, in causing confusion, was not in the records, and therefore not acted upon. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to identify clinically significant medication risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of supervision arrangements for falls and mobilisation risk

Wider context from the report

“(2) Nursing notes documented a risk of falls/mobilisation and action to be taken, but there was no supervision arrangement in place. One to one care had been in contemplation. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to review and act on nursing risk records

Wider context from the report

“(3) Whilst nursing notes were being kept about the risks, the records were not being reviewed and acted upon. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include verbal handover of falls-risk patients’ care plans in nursing handover safety briefings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. The safety briefing during nursing handover is now to include a verbal handover of the care plans for patients assessed as at risk of falls to alert incoming staff members as to the risk and care plan.”

Source location

2015-0437-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 11 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Move Ward 9F multidisciplinary meetings earlier to develop falls-risk action plans and communicate overnight deterioration.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. Multidisciplinary Team meetings on Ward 9F have now been changed to earlier in the day to discuss patients and make effective action plans for patient at risk of falls. This meeting consists of medical/surgical teams, physiotherapy, Occupational Therapists and the Ward Nurse in charge and includes a medical handover to ensure communication of any deterioration overnight that could influence risk of falls, such as increased confusion.”

Source location

2015-0437-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 11 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reinforce documenting drug allergies and adverse effects and escalate drug-related issues to senior clinical staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. The members of staff have been reminded of the importance of adhering to the normal process of ‘documenting allergies and adverse effects’ regardless of how unique the reaction may be as in this case. This issue has also been discussed in the Renal Mortality and Morbidity meeting as a learning point for”

Source location

2015-0437-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 11 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Recruit a practice development team to support ward adherence to documentation, risk-assessment and communication protocols.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A practice development team has been recruited to support ward staff in adhering to ward protocols and procedures including documentation, assessment of risks and communication. We also have facilitated training from the ‘Falls Lead’ for the Trust to re-train nurses regarding the fall procedure and management and this took place on 29 June 2015.”

Source location

2015-0437-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 11 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review escalation of one-to-one supervision requests and enable out-of-hours site-manager contact for patients at risk of falls or confusion.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have reviewed the escalation of our ‘Specials’ requests to Bank Partners so that patients can be appropriately monitored and supervised (one to one) when they are assessed as at risk of falls and/or confused. Site managers can now be contacted out of hours to ensure appropriate management of care.”

Source location

2015-0437-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 11 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide Falls Lead training to retrain nurses in fall procedures and management.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A practice development team has been recruited to support ward staff in adhering to ward protocols and procedures including documentation, assessment of risks and communication. We also have facilitated training from the ‘Falls Lead’ for the Trust to re-train nurses regarding the fall procedure and management and this took place on 29 June 2015.”

Source location

2015-0437-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 11 November 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require senior nursing staff to audit daily nursing and falls-risk documentation, including call-bell access, assessments and care-plan changes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It has been emphasised to all senior nursing staff that daily auditing of all nursing and falls risk documentation must be carried out. This will ensure that call bells are within reach of patients and that all assessments and any changes in care plans are highlighted in the medical records.”

Source location

2015-0437-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 11 November 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026