Afolabi Oluwafemi OJERINDE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 25 Jun 2024•Manchester City

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to require staff approval before petrol pump access
  2. Failure to restrict petrol pump use to required motor vehicles or authorised containers

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Tesco Stores Limited

    Work with fire authorities to establish remotely monitored petrol-station CCTV scenarios and identify risk-mitigating improvements.

  2. Tesco Stores Limited

    Establish a collaborative stakeholder working group to review scenarios, share knowledge and consider operational or technological safety opportunities.

  3. Tesco Stores Limited

    Keep relevant petrol-station processes, systems and Primary Authority Advice under review as the coroner’s investigation continues.

  4. Tesco Stores Limited

    Operate risk-assessed intuitive monitoring systems with supporting controls for unattended petrol-station self-service.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Tesco Stores Limited

    Existing risk-assessed systems and controls for remotely monitored petrol stations were approved as legislatively compliant by the competent Primary Authority.

    Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to require staff approval before petrol pump access

Wider context from the report

“1. The Deceased was able to use the petrol pump without the required motor vehicle or authorised plastic or metal container; 2. There was no member of staff present at the petrol station to approve or deny the Deceased access to the petrol pump, and his approval was automatic following payment made at the pump. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to restrict petrol pump use to required motor vehicles or authorised containers

Wider context from the report

“1. The Deceased was able to use the petrol pump without the required motor vehicle or authorised plastic or metal container; 2. There was no member of staff present at the petrol station to approve or deny the Deceased access to the petrol pump, and his approval was automatic following payment made at the pump. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with fire authorities to establish remotely monitored petrol-station CCTV scenarios and identify risk-mitigating improvements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“15. After this incident and before the PFD Report was issued – recognising the seriousness of the tragic events, acknowledging the legitimate interest of GMFRS, and also recognising that broader industry considerations applied and broader industry knowledge and experience would be valuable – TSL had initiated and then commenced discussions with GMFRS and HFRS to set up a collaborative working group with relevant stakeholders both within TSL and externally throughout the industry and with enforcing authorities. Once established, the group will be chaired by Clare Scawthorn, in her independent capacity as Technical Manager for the Petroleum Retailers Association.”

Source location

Response from Tesco
Page 3 · response
Published 27 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish a collaborative stakeholder working group to review scenarios, share knowledge and consider operational or technological safety opportunities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“15. After this incident and before the PFD Report was issued – recognising the seriousness of the tragic events, acknowledging the legitimate interest of GMFRS, and also recognising that broader industry considerations applied and broader industry knowledge and experience would be valuable – TSL had initiated and then commenced discussions with GMFRS and HFRS to set up a collaborative working group with relevant stakeholders both within TSL and externally throughout the industry and with enforcing authorities. Once established, the group will be chaired by Clare Scawthorn, in her independent capacity as Technical Manager for the Petroleum Retailers Association.”

Source location

Response from Tesco
Page 3 · response
Published 27 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Keep relevant petrol-station processes, systems and Primary Authority Advice under review as the coroner’s investigation continues.

Verbatim wording from the response

“14. Further and whilst the systems in place at the Blackley petrol filling station at the time of the incident were subject to, and complied with, TSL’s PA Advice, we would like to assure the Coroner that TSL takes every opportunity to review its processes and systems whenever an incident occurs, including in respect of any Primary Authority Advice as appropriate. It is committed to keep the relevant processes and systems under careful review as the Coroner’s investigation continues (and as the Coroner is aware it appears there is considerable disclosure still to be made in the Coroner’s investigation, such disclosure as has so far been made being limited primarily to medical matters).”

Source location

Response from Tesco
Page 3 · response
Published 27 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate risk-assessed intuitive monitoring systems with supporting controls for unattended petrol-station self-service.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4. Hertfordshire Fire & Rescue Service (“HFRS”) are the Fire Primary Authority partner for TSL under the provisions of the Regulatory and Enforcement Sanctions Act 2008 (“RES Act”). On 15 December 2020, HFRS issued Primary Authority Advice pursuant to s.27 RES Act to TSL relating to: “The use of intuitive monitoring systems to allow petrol filling stations to trade without a dedicated person permanently monitoring CCTV for each individual site” (the “PA Advice”).”

Source location

Response from Tesco
Page 2 · response
Published 27 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing risk-assessed systems and controls for remotely monitored petrol stations were approved as legislatively compliant by the competent Primary Authority.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4. Hertfordshire Fire & Rescue Service (“HFRS”) are the Fire Primary Authority partner for TSL under the provisions of the Regulatory and Enforcement Sanctions Act 2008 (“RES Act”). On 15 December 2020, HFRS issued Primary Authority Advice pursuant to s.27 RES Act to TSL relating to: “The use of intuitive monitoring systems to allow petrol filling stations to trade without a dedicated person permanently monitoring CCTV for each individual site” (the “PA Advice”).”

Source location

Response from Tesco
Page 2 · response
Published 27 June 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026