PFD report

Stanislav Mucha · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 Aug 2022•Manchester North

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of documented agreement on assessment outcomes between professionals
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable documentation and communication of shared clinical decisions
  2. Failure to make and retain assessment notes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Use communication opportunities to remind members to record all clinical contacts consistently and comprehensively, including Mental Health Act contacts.

    Stated by Royal College of PsychiatristsStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 30 September 2022.
  2. Action

    Implement a mental health assessment recording template requiring Section 12 doctors to document non-detention rationales and alternative plans.

    Stated by Bury Borough CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 September 2022.
  3. Action

    Consider including a specific timeframe for producing assessment notes in the revised Mental Health Act Code of Practice.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 30 September 2022.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.4

  1. Position

    Providing facilities to record assessment details is an operational responsibility for the specific area concerned.

    Stated by Royal College of PsychiatristsRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of documented agreement on assessment outcomes between professionals

Wider context from the report

“2. Following the assessment on the 22nd January 2021 there was no documented agreement as to the outcome of the assessment between all professionals. This would have negated the confusion and lack of understanding as to what had occurred and the actions required. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable documentation and communication of shared clinical decisions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to make and retain assessment notes

Wider context from the report

“1. The Independent Section 12 Consultant Psychiatrist did not make and the court heard does not have the facilities to make any notes in relation to their assessment. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use communication opportunities to remind members to record all clinical contacts consistently and comprehensively, including Mental Health Act contacts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“RCPsych will use communication opportunities to:”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Psychiatrits
Page 2 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a mental health assessment recording template requiring Section 12 doctors to document non-detention rationales and alternative plans.

Verbatim wording from the response

“████████ Interim Lead AMHP (Approved Mental Health Professional) for Bury Council has written to me with the following steps that have now been implemented as result of the above issuance of the Regulation 28:”

Source location

Response from Bury Council
Page 1 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider including a specific timeframe for producing assessment notes in the revised Mental Health Act Code of Practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Code of Practice does not state the timeframes in which notes of any assessment should be produced and made available. As you may be aware, work is currently in train to reform the Mental Health Act and subsequently its Code of Practice. As part of these reforms we will consider whether the revised Code of Practice should include a specific time period during which notes of any assessment should be produced. I am therefore very grateful that you have brought this matter to my attention.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Providing facilities to record assessment details is an operational responsibility for the specific area concerned.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The College is very clear that it is good practice to document all clinical contacts, and this is a routine expectation of healthcare professionals across a spectrum of practice. While we are happy to use appropriate communication mechanisms to remind our members of this, in this case the Section 12 doctor seems to assert that there was no facility for them to do so. This being the case, it would seem to be an issue that needs to be addressed as an operational issue in the specific area so that there are the opportunities in place for the details of the interaction to be recorded.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Psychiatrits
Page 1 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Mental Health Act assessment system is designed to produce clear outcomes, with disagreement between assessors serving as an intended safeguard.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our initial thoughts on this are that the way the system is designed means that there should not be a lack of clarity or ability to come to a clear outcome. Outcomes of MHA assessments are decided by any one of the 3 assessors (1st rec doctor, S12 doctor, AMHP) not recommending compulsory powers and then the AMHP having a final veto on the application.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Psychiatrits
Page 1 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Section 12 doctors are responsible for recording their decisions when a Mental Health Act assessment has taken place.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, Section 14.75 of the Code of Practice places a responsibility on Section 12 doctors to record their decisions if an assessment has taken place. However, the Code of Practice is not explicit on how these notes should be recorded. We note that there was some dispute about whether an assessment had taken place.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

AMHPs are responsible for recording assessment outcomes and communicating decisions and reasons to relevant professionals.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Mental Health Act 1983 Code of Practice explicitly places the duty to record the outcome of an assessment on the Approved Mental Health Professional (AMHP). If the AMHP believed that an assessment had taken place, this should have been recorded and communicated to the Section 12 doctors. Relevant sections of the Code of Practice are below:”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 1 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Require AMHPs to complete social circumstance reports documenting non-detention rationales and alternatives to hospital admission.

    Stated by Bury Borough CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 September 2022.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require AMHPs to complete social circumstance reports documenting non-detention rationales and alternatives to hospital admission.

Verbatim wording from the response

“████████ Interim Lead AMHP (Approved Mental Health Professional) for Bury Council has written to me with the following steps that have now been implemented as result of the above issuance of the Regulation 28:”

Source location

Response from Bury Council
Page 1 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026