PFD report

Rita Margaret Thomas and Christine Dale · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Feb 2026•Cumbria

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
10

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to set a speed limit that provides sufficient reaction time at the A684 junction
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate speed control at hazardous road locations
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Upgrade approach signing and install STOP signs, approach lane delineation markings, and transverse yellow markings at the junction.

    Stated by National HighwaysStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 February 2026.
  2. Action

    Undertake the commissioned independent Engineering Safety Study to review existing conditions, completed works and further engineering, enforcement, educational and speed-limit measures.

    Stated by Westmorland and Furness CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 February 2026.
  3. Action

    Conduct a full speed review of the A684 using traffic data collected with the Safety Camera Unit.

    Stated by Westmorland and Furness CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 February 2026.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Changes to the National Speed Limit on the A684 are the responsibility of Westmorland and Furness Council, not National Highways.

    Stated by National HighwaysRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to set a speed limit that provides sufficient reaction time at the A684 junction

Wider context from the report

“(1) The exit ramps at Junction 37 of the M6 are recognised to be 'high harm' spots. Several very serious collisions have occurred at the same location. Significant efforts have been made to address this, including by placing stop signs, increasing the visibility of signs, and improving driver awareness. However, the A684 remains the subject of the National Speed Limit. I was informed that no speed limit was imposed because previous investigation 'did not highlight a speeding problem'. The evidence I heard included an observation by the driver of the bus that: "At the point where I first saw the car, I was only a few metres away from the top of the slip road. The dark car was travelling up the slip road from my left-hand side. I must have only been aware of its presence for a matter of one or two seconds...I did not have any time to react or take any evasive action. As far as I recall I did not have time to brake or steer to try and avoid the collision." For the avoidance of doubt, the evidence indicates that the bus was being driven at less than the national speed limit. I am concerned that this indicates that the speed at which vehicles are permitted to drive on the A684, taken with the design of the junction, gives drivers insufficient time to react in the event that a vehicle crosses into their path. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate speed control at hazardous road locations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Upgrade approach signing and install STOP signs, approach lane delineation markings, and transverse yellow markings at the junction.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a direct result, the already substantial, approach signing has been upgraded and improved, ‘STOP’ signing and approach lane delineation markings have been installed”

Source location

2026-0093 - Response from National Highways
Page 1 · response
Published 23 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undertake the commissioned independent Engineering Safety Study to review existing conditions, completed works and further engineering, enforcement, educational and speed-limit measures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“An independent consultancy has been commissioned to undertake the full Engineering Safety Study, which will fully review:”

Source location

2026-0093 - Response from Westmorland and Furness Council
Page 5 · response
Published 23 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct a full speed review of the A684 using traffic data collected with the Safety Camera Unit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In parallel, the Council conducted a full speed review of the A684 in partnership with the Cumbria Constabulary Safety Camera Unit in November 2024.”

Source location

2026-0093 - Response from Westmorland and Furness Council
Page 2 · response
Published 23 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete the A684 safety improvement package, including centre lines, road studs, rumble strips, high-friction surfacing and additional SLOW markings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A comprehensive series of improvements along approximately 500 metres of carriageway and implemented between November and December 2024. These were designed to highlight the presence of the approaching junction to improve driver awareness and reduce approaching speeds.”

Source location

2026-0093 - Response from Westmorland and Furness Council
Page 2 · response
Published 23 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Changes to the National Speed Limit on the A684 are the responsibility of Westmorland and Furness Council, not National Highways.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To clarify, any changes to the current National Speed Limit along this section of the A684 would be the responsibility of Westmorland and Furness Council and not National Highways.”

Source location

2026-0093 - Response from National Highways
Page 1 · response
Published 23 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A reduced speed limit cannot be proposed without completing the full analytical process required by national guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Nonetheless, the question of a reduced speed limit is still being considered by the Partnership and has been incorporated into an independent Engineering Safety Study which is being commissioned by Westmorland and Furness Council.”

Source location

2026-0093 - Response from Westmorland and Furness Council
Page 5 · response
Published 23 February 2026

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. 1

    Monitor the junction and the performance of installed safety improvements within National Highways’ area of responsibility.

    Stated by National HighwaysStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 February 2026.
  2. 2

    Undertake targeted police engagement and enforcement addressing driver non-compliance with STOP signs.

    Stated by Westmorland and Furness CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 February 2026.
  3. 3

    Explore options for remote digital enforcement at the junction.

    Stated by Westmorland and Furness CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 February 2026.
  4. 4

    Increase public communication reinforcing awareness of the new safety measures.

    Stated by Westmorland and Furness CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 February 2026.
  5. 5

    Review the December 2024 improvements through a multi-agency Cumbria Road Safety Partnership assessment.

    Stated by Westmorland and Furness CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 February 2026.
  6. 6

    Continue reviewing road traffic collisions and assessing the need for further safety measures under statutory duties.

    Stated by Westmorland and Furness CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 February 2026.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Monitoring recorded average A684 speeds below the permitted limit, disputing that speeding was the material safety problem.

    Stated by Westmorland and Furness CouncilDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor the junction and the performance of installed safety improvements within National Highways’ area of responsibility.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will continue to monitor the junction within our area of responsibility to monitor the performance of the improvements we have installed and react accordingly should that be necessary.”

Source location

2026-0093 - Response from National Highways
Page 2 · response
Published 23 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undertake targeted police engagement and enforcement addressing driver non-compliance with STOP signs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Video evidence reviewed during the meeting highlighted ongoing issues with driver non-compliance at the STOP signs.”

Source location

2026-0093 - Response from Westmorland and Furness Council
Page 6 · response
Published 23 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Explore options for remote digital enforcement at the junction.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Partnership therefore agreed to some ongoing actions which are reviewed at monthly operational Cumbria Road Safety Partnership meetings with no end date currently set. A further review will now be set after National Highways most recent completed works in February/March 2026 to resurface and increase skid resistance of the exit slip roads has been completed and given time to be monitored. The current ongoing actions are as follows:”

Source location

2026-0093 - Response from Westmorland and Furness Council
Page 6 · response
Published 23 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Increase public communication reinforcing awareness of the new safety measures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Partnership therefore agreed to some ongoing actions which are reviewed at monthly operational Cumbria Road Safety Partnership meetings with no end date currently set. A further review will now be set after National Highways most recent completed works in February/March 2026 to resurface and increase skid resistance of the exit slip roads has been completed and given time to be monitored. The current ongoing actions are as follows:”

Source location

2026-0093 - Response from Westmorland and Furness Council
Page 6 · response
Published 23 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the December 2024 improvements through a multi-agency Cumbria Road Safety Partnership assessment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to the commissioning of the engineering safety study, a follow-up multi-agency through the Cumbria Road Safety Partnership of Westmorland and Furness Council, National Highways, Cumbria Constabulary and Cumbria Fire held on 2 May 2025 examined the impact of the December 2024 improvements.”

Source location

2026-0093 - Response from Westmorland and Furness Council
Page 5 · response
Published 23 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue reviewing road traffic collisions and assessing the need for further safety measures under statutory duties.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In accordance with our statutory obligations under Section 39 of the Road Traffic Act 1988, the Council will continue to review road traffic collisions and assess the need for further safety measures We hope to offer assurance that the A684 from Kendal through to (and including) Junction 37 has been prioritised for further detailed assessment.”

Source location

2026-0093 - Response from Westmorland and Furness Council
Page 6 · response
Published 23 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitoring recorded average A684 speeds below the permitted limit, disputing that speeding was the material safety problem.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Prior monitoring by Cumbria Constabulary Safety Camera Group as part of the partnership in May/June 2024 and October 2024, recorded average speeds on the A684 to be below the permitted speed (on average 40-50mph).”

Source location

2026-0093 - Response from Westmorland and Furness Council
Page 5 · response
Published 23 February 2026

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026