PFD report

Phephisa MABUZA · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 15 Jul 2024•Central and South East Kent

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure of the Crisis Response Service operational policy to accurately reflect triage codes D and E
  2. Failure of local category D response guidance to reflect the national 72-hour timeframe
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Correct the erroneous triage response times in the Crisis Response Service Standard Operational Policy.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 September 2024.
  2. Action

    Establish consistent clinical rationale frameworks and safe response timeframes for patients presenting to Crisis Response Services.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 September 2024.
  3. Action

    Align Trust policies with national standards for Crisis Response Services.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 11 September 2024.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the Crisis Response Service operational policy to accurately reflect triage codes D and E

Wider context from the report

“(2) Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust's existing standard operational policy document for the Crisis Response Service incorrectly states triage codes D and E on the appendix as 'within 24 hours- same day response@ and do not reflect the scale on the 111 Triage form or the national guidance. I delayed issuing this report so that the Trust could inform me of the current position and whether any remedial action had been taken. A memo has been sent to all staff to notify them that the operational policy has been wrongly coded but a decision had not yet been taken as to whether and how the Trust intended to move forward in respect of the departure from the national guidance ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of local category D response guidance to reflect the national 72-hour timeframe

Wider context from the report

“(1) Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust Crisis Response Service follows the UK Mental Health Triage scale in classifying the urgency and service response requirements of clinical presentations at the point of contact. The scale is embedded within the 111 Triage form utilised by clinicians in their clinical decision making following a triage. The Trust has departed from the national guidance for category D presentations such that the local guidance has been amended to reflect a 7 day response when the national guidance states 72 hours ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Correct the erroneous triage response times in the Crisis Response Service Standard Operational Policy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The existing Standard Operational Policy in place is only for use by the Crisis Response Services across the Trust. It is acknowledged that the triage response times on Triage Codes D and E on the appendix were incorrectly stated as “Within 24 hours – Same Day” response, and do not reflect the scale on the form in use on the clinical system. This was owing to a typing error when the policy was completed, and that was unfortunately not picked up before the document went live. The Trust sincerely apologises for missing this, and the confusion it caused to both the Court and to the family.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership NHS
Page 2 · response
Published 11 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish consistent clinical rationale frameworks and safe response timeframes for patients presenting to Crisis Response Services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“amended to reflect 7 days. During our investigations, the Trust was unable identify exactly why the decision was taken, however it appears to have been done to align with our community services in their operational frameworks, as the Trust embedded CRS into its services. In light of this, the senior management in the CRS and the Business Partners, have met to take forward this point. We now have clear clinical rationale frameworks, consistently and appropriate and safe time frames for our patients coming through CRS.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership NHS
Page 2 · response
Published 11 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Align Trust policies with national standards for Crisis Response Services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Additionally work is underway in order to ensure Trust Policies align with national standards as required.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership NHS
Page 2 · response
Published 11 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate a reminder to clinicians and other Crisis Response Service leads to use the UK Mental Health Triage Scale in clinical decision-making.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Standard Operational Policy has been reviewed and the identified errors rectified. A memo has been sent to all clinicians within the service reminding them of the use of the UK Mental Health Triage Scale in informing their clinical judgment in the decision making process. This has also been shared with the leads covering the other CRS teams.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership NHS
Page 2 · response
Published 11 September 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Monitor the implemented provisions to assess their contribution to patient safety and therapeutic care.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 11 September 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor the implemented provisions to assess their contribution to patient safety and therapeutic care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I hope that I have provided reassurances around the steps that we have taken to address the issues of concern contained within your report. We appreciate that there is an acute need to embed and effect change, hence we will monitor the above provisions to ensure these are contributing to our overall aim of keeping patients safe and delivering therapeutic care.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership NHS
Page 2 · response
Published 11 September 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026