PFD report

Mrs Marie Rollason · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 Feb 2016•Black Country

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to provide further hospital observation after a potential red-flag ECG finding
  2. Failure to recognise and accurately record an abnormal ECG indicating a potential pulmonary embolism
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable recognition and management of pulmonary embolism
  3. Failure to undertake further diagnostic testing for a possible pulmonary embolism
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable recognition and management of pulmonary embolism
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Provide individual pulmonary embolism-focused ECG interpretation training to the directly involved clinical staff.

    Stated by the Royal Wolverhampton NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 24 February 2016.
  2. Action

    Provide Emergency Department training on identifying and treating pulmonary embolism, including ECG abnormalities.

    Stated by the Royal Wolverhampton NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 February 2016.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide further hospital observation after a potential red-flag ECG finding

Wider context from the report

“2. When she was admitted back to the Hospital on the 23 December 2015, an ECG trace revealed an abnormality in the trace which can be indicative of changes that occur during a pulmonary embolism. However the Junior Doctor recorded the ECG trace "was okay". She wasn't kept in for further observation but instead discharged and advised that if the dizziness/fainting spells continue then she should be referred to a cardiologist via her GP. This was effectively a missed opportunity to render basic medical care. 3. The Consultant who gave evidence suggested that the ECG trace was a potential “Red flag” and he would have admitted her for further observation given that she had no previous cardiac related complaints and to try and understand the basis for her loss of consciousness. He went on to confirm in his opinion that on the balance of probability this was a failure in basic medical care. 4. Moreover, during the inquest the Consultant gave evidence that in his opinion, had she been kept in Hospital and observed, then on the balance of probability it is more likely than not she may have survived. Further tests including the D-Dimer test could have been done to confirm the diagnosis and appropriate treatment commenced. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to recognise and accurately record an abnormal ECG indicating a potential pulmonary embolism

Wider context from the report

“2. When she was admitted back to the Hospital on the 23 December 2015, an ECG trace revealed an abnormality in the trace which can be indicative of changes that occur during a pulmonary embolism. However the Junior Doctor recorded the ECG trace "was okay". She wasn't kept in for further observation but instead discharged and advised that if the dizziness/fainting spells continue then she should be referred to a cardiologist via her GP. This was effectively a missed opportunity to render basic medical care. 3. The Consultant who gave evidence suggested that the ECG trace was a potential “Red flag” and he would have admitted her for further observation given that she had no previous cardiac related complaints and to try and understand the basis for her loss of consciousness. He went on to confirm in his opinion that on the balance of probability this was a failure in basic medical care. 4. Moreover, during the inquest the Consultant gave evidence that in his opinion, had she been kept in Hospital and observed, then on the balance of probability it is more likely than not she may have survived. Further tests including the D-Dimer test could have been done to confirm the diagnosis and appropriate treatment commenced. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable recognition and management of pulmonary embolism.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to undertake further diagnostic testing for a possible pulmonary embolism

Wider context from the report

“2. When she was admitted back to the Hospital on the 23 December 2015, an ECG trace revealed an abnormality in the trace which can be indicative of changes that occur during a pulmonary embolism. However the Junior Doctor recorded the ECG trace "was okay". She wasn't kept in for further observation but instead discharged and advised that if the dizziness/fainting spells continue then she should be referred to a cardiologist via her GP. This was effectively a missed opportunity to render basic medical care. 3. The Consultant who gave evidence suggested that the ECG trace was a potential “Red flag” and he would have admitted her for further observation given that she had no previous cardiac related complaints and to try and understand the basis for her loss of consciousness. He went on to confirm in his opinion that on the balance of probability this was a failure in basic medical care. 4. Moreover, during the inquest the Consultant gave evidence that in his opinion, had she been kept in Hospital and observed, then on the balance of probability it is more likely than not she may have survived. Further tests including the D-Dimer test could have been done to confirm the diagnosis and appropriate treatment commenced. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable recognition and management of pulmonary embolism.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide individual pulmonary embolism-focused ECG interpretation training to the directly involved clinical staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The clinical staff directly involved in the management of Marie Rollason will have individual training in the interpretation of ECG findings in patients with pulmonary embolism specifically. Abnormalities in ECG tracings associated with pulmonary embolism are also included in the above noted training sessions.”

Source location

2016-0100-Response-by-Royal-Wolverhampton-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 24 February 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide Emergency Department training on identifying and treating pulmonary embolism, including ECG abnormalities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that the clinical staff in the Emergency Department have regular training in the identification and treatment of pulmonary embolism and this subject is a standard item on the teaching curriculum. A training session on venous thromboembolism has recently been delivered within the Emergency Department.”

Source location

2016-0100-Response-by-Royal-Wolverhampton-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 24 February 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026