PFD report

Graham Earl · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 30 Sep 2019•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Failure of GPs to recognise the link between the therapy and Pulmonary Fibrosis
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to recognise medication-related pulmonary toxicity
  2. Failure to seek early guidance from the prescribing secondary care physician
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable coordination and information sharing between primary and secondary care
  3. Failure to refer prescription amendments to the secondary care doctor for medication not started in primary care
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable doctor-to-doctor coordination of prescribing
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of GPs to recognise the link between the therapy and Pulmonary Fibrosis

Wider context from the report

“1. The GPs involved did not understand or recognise the known link between the therapy and Pulmonary Fibrosis and did not seek guidance from the prescribing secondary care physician at an early stage. The evidence was that the advice would have been to stop prescribing immediately; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to recognise medication-related pulmonary toxicity.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to seek early guidance from the prescribing secondary care physician

Wider context from the report

“1. The GPs involved did not understand or recognise the known link between the therapy and Pulmonary Fibrosis and did not seek guidance from the prescribing secondary care physician at an early stage. The evidence was that the advice would have been to stop prescribing immediately; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable coordination and information sharing between primary and secondary care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to refer prescription amendments to the secondary care doctor for medication not started in primary care

Wider context from the report

“2. A GP amended the prescription subsequently without reference to the secondary care doctor despite the fact that this is not a medication started in primary care; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable doctor-to-doctor coordination of prescribing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

CCG classification of the drug as green despite known side effects

Wider context from the report

“4. The drug is currently green on the CCG classification. In other CCG areas it is amber given the known side effects. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to identify clinically significant medication risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of GP awareness of escalation procedures for medication side effects

Wider context from the report

“3. The indication was that GPs involved were not aware of what they should do if there were side effects from the medication in terms of escalation; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable clinician management of medication side effects.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.